thumbnail of 0cbe281dd08f3ec129e9c0c46d97b4b5b402743cf4c8ecd27d04596b78d42682.png
thumbnail of 0cbe281dd08f3ec129e9c0c46d97b4b5b402743cf4c8ecd27d04596b78d42682.png
0cbe281dd08f3ec129e9c... png
(2.41 MB, 1575x1302)
thumbnail of 288.jpg
thumbnail of 288.jpg
288 jpg
(103.19 KB, 637x627)
 >>/92842/
> Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler
Ah. Easy enough to find. If you read into it, do let me know what slanderous statements you discover there (and page reference is important).
https://archive.org/details/pdfy-lwUqPAGSzT-3bnd3/page/n23/mode/2up
As David Irving pointed out: book references slandering Hitler tend to go around where a group of authors references each other until you arrive at the author again. A circle of lies. Yet they're called "historians". I have seen many claims that "international jewry financed Hitler". No proof. Though if they did, he clearly struck financial blows at them and made them regret their subterfuge.

> I rarely or not at all write dots or checkers with english short sentence building
They're called "run-on sentences". Which is easier to say than all that. I'm not bothered by any run-on sentence.