>>/94968/
> The only problem here is promoting the NF with it's history of Covington furiously defending a child molesting jew. That taints a movement forever
I think that's fair, if we mean the apparatus of NF by 'movement'. I can't think of anything better than the meta-objective and spirit of the NF (and other movements like it) however. My basic presumptions are this: non-Whites sustain themselves through gibs that ZOG provides, this system cannot last much longer this century, non-Whites did not evolve for cold regions, the Northwest has an ideal economy which can survive secession and/or balkanization, and it has exit points which can survive economic strange-holds or sanctions. The government of the United States is unlikely to collapse wholesale any time soon, but it will lose its ability to enforce ZOG especially as conditions worsen.
It's preferable to be surrounded by Whites, in a territory that can survive collapse, which is relatively free of natural disasters in its history, with a legal apparatus on hand (something like the Northwest Constitution), and a non-uniformed offensive-ready minutemen coalition who know the land and their neighbors already. I have no illusions that a separate territory can be formed without the breakdown of the United States, a black-out period with suspension of federal law, and inevitable violence (even if it's simply against marauding non-Whites). Collapse is inevitable, I'm just arguing for an active plan to be on relatively solid footing when such collapse does occur.