a random pol banner

/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Political discussion of ideology, history, and [current] events.


New Reply on thread #103530
X
Max 20 files0 B total
[New Reply]

[Index] [Catalog] [Banners] [Logs]
Posting mode: Reply [Return]


thumbnail of romanov-family-portrait-george-alexander.jpg
thumbnail of romanov-family-portrait-george-alexander.jpg
romanov-family-portra... jpg
(131.82 KB, 900x728)
I know all of you here are German plebs lovers and I dont blame you for that, you see modern society and its problems got us united against a single front but what if the Germans were not the actual good guys but someone else ? whom the bankers made sure to take out first to accelerate Germany on its own in a direct conflict with the British and the French ? 

yes it was the Tsarist Russia they were the good guys and not the Germans I am sorry if this offends any of you orthodox Christianity is the truth.

you want to understand or just mainly disagree ? 
the reality of the world we live in today and its geopolitics stems from one of the greatest betrayals in Christian history which is the 4th crusade, that crusade destroyed Rome the last bastion of civilization we ever knew the people who got wealthy from it are Venice and Genoa these two tiny city states destroyed Rome and sucked it's wealth leaving a vulnerable husk shell of its former glory, 250 years later the Roaches from the east came and destroyed it to a point it could never ever recover they raped pillaged and stole and renamed it Istanbul, they only put a final nail after the fourth crusade in 1204, and do you think the pope did anything ? he saw the gold flowing in he did not pat an eye. 
Imagine destroying the most sacred city in Christian history and the true heir to Rome and the pope does nothing to punish you!!

moving on, this did set in the stage for new geopolitical game where the Ottomans became so strong they almost took Vienna and swallowed all of Europe.

Well until a new Russian empire emerged from the ashes of Rome, becoming the 3rd Rome and the new protector of Orthodox Christians and most importantly the holy land as they saw themselves fit to retake Constantinople, this did set in motion a plan by Catherine the great and the Eastern question by the Imperialist Latin west "How do we dismantle the ottomans and not let Russia dominate the Mediterranean ? ", the western powers specially Britain and France were terrified of a pan-orthodox Roman super power that can unite all of the Slavic countries and counter weight the French and the British making sure no Israel being founded, the bankers rolled in fear thinking about that possibility, as the British understood a strong Russia meaning they cannot enslave the world, the British and the French were always wicked and slaves to the Rothchild the system of banking that the kikes created in these two countries meant that the goals and plans of the Zionists were the number one priority of the ruling class of Britain and France, both these countries deserves no remorse for what they did. 

the Russian defeated the Ottomans in most of the wars they fought together but the British and the French always stood up to make sure that the ottomans survive Russia and Constantinople stayed in the hands of the Turks, as if Russia took Constantinople that means the end of the Zionist dream and the end of the British raj and their dominance over the east also this means no communism and no nazi Germany, the German monarchy would have survived as world war 1 wont happen probably and even if it would happen the Russians wont be dragged into it due to the assassination of the Austrian Archduke Franz Ferdinan.

the British and the French being the spawn of Satan themselves will try aggressive diplomacy not to confront a strong orthodox Russia that have access to the Mediterranean and most importantly  Bosphorus and Dardanelles. 

this would mean great things for all of man kind as no ottomans meaning no chattel slavery and no more stone worship the middle east will go back to its Christian roots and Palestine will be protected by the might of a Roman orthodox empire. 

This why the slaughtered the Romanov in the most Satanic way because they hated them so much. 

Next topic will be about who financed the revolution in Russia and the red terrorists.
thumbnail of bce.jpg
thumbnail of bce.jpg
bce jpg
(25.43 KB, 608x402)
What you present is a delusion, a sentimental fantasy of Tsarist Russia as some Christian bastion against Jewish finance, when in truth, the Romanovs were infested with the same international Jewish clique that plagued Europe. Orthodox Christianity as a shield against Jewish power? The Tsars themselves bowed to foreign bankers, taking loans from the Rothschilds and Warburgs. The Russian court was rotted by Freemasons and crypto-Jews, just as Berlin, Paris and London. Yes, Venice and Genoa looted Constantinople. The Byzantines were already a dying empire, weak from internal strife and infiltration by Jewish merchants at their ports. A strong empire does not fall to Crusaders or Turks.

The British and the French did not fear Russia's Christianity. It feared Russia for being another empire competing for global domination. The Romanovs allowed Rasputin, that degenerate Jew obsessed fake mystic (Simanovitch, his kike secretary), to rule through the Tsarina. They failed to purge Jews from their cities, where Bolshevik ideals festered. They lost the loyalty of their own people, and then lost their lives literally to vile women and children murdering Jews. The true betrayal was not the Fourth Crusade, it was the alliance between the Romanovs and the British/French in World War I, sending Orthodox Christian sons to die for Jewish financed and influence empires. The Tsar should have allied with Germany, the only power fighting both Jewish finance and Bolshevism.

You think a Russian Constantinople would have stopped Israel? The Jews infiltrated Russia centuries ago, the Pale of Settlement from 1791 to 1917 was their breeding ground for revolution, permitting them to execute the Tsar and his defenseless wife, daughters and son. The Tsar died because he made the mistake of not being ruthless enough. Those Germans you hope we'll overlook? The Kaiser was weak yes, but Hitler accomplished what the Kaiser could not. A true Orthodox Russia would have been an ally to Germany in World War I, but the real Russia was already lost to Jewish subversion. Was the Tsar's execution a tragedy? Yes. Were the Jews who violently stabbed his daughters after killing him and his defenseless young son, sick vile bastards? Also yes. If the Tsar was strong, he would have enacted the purge of all Jewish influence, from Moscow and extending outwards to London and Paris. Your nostalgia for Tsarism is misplaced.

 >>/103530/
> Tsar russia was a christian bastion against decadent west

Yea sure jim so much fucking sure they were jew free
So much that in 1900s so much of jewish emigrants came from there to plot in england bolshevik plot the goverment had to start regulate arrivals after nottingham or what incident it was and all beloved orthodox church several times prevented the peasants to finally do some spring clean up since goverment couldnt from the amount of corruption below tsar to do anything

Or even better how did the case of Bellis affair went up huh
Aquitted even it was obvious he did it and everyone who either saw or proved either dissapeared, died or suddenly had change of heart
Just because tsar said englishman is zhid sentence it didnt reflect the national sentiment as tsar russia was undermined from bottom to up compared to west where it was from up to bottom and he payed for that 

> Russian constantinopol

Oh if you only know how byzantine empire was undermined by jewish lobbyism because the byzantines tought some water sprinkles on forehead change the man and no one would from vatican backstab them because of impostor desiring personal enrichment

And just to add some salt to injury
No one here worships germans or anything else
We only are loyal to national socialist worldview of blood and soil and oppose anything that undermines any of that

 >>/103534/
 >>/103534/
lol you are truly one hell of an anti reasoning mutt I cannot truly go in lengths to describe how false your allegations are !

are you really that ignorant to claim that Tsarist Russia allowed Rothchild or kike central banking 

why cannot you guys admit being wrong once in your f*cking life 


Russia did issue international bonds, especially in France (the famous “Russian bonds” many French citizens held and lost value on after the revolution).

Example: By 1914, Russian foreign debt was significant, especially to French investors.

However: Unlike Britain or France, Russia maintained tighter control over its central monetary system.
Russia’s imperial government did not allow full private banking control like the Rothschild-type networks had in Britain.

2️⃣ Was the Rothschild-style central banking system allowed in Russia?
No. Tsarist Russia did not have a privately controlled central bank.
The Russian State Bank, founded in 1860, was state-owned and operated to support Russian government policy and industrial development, not private banker profits.
btw your daddy had private banking system so spare me 

and not its not Jewish infiltration that destroyed Byzantium it was the fourth crusade stop being so anti intellectual Jesus christ 

the catholic betrayal of destroying Rome is so well documented that we have first primary sources for it. 
Contrast with Britain: The Bank of England was effectively controlled by private banking interests, particularly by families like the Rothschilds after the 18th century.

thumbnail of Screenshot 2025-07-09 140002.png
thumbnail of Screenshot 2025-07-09 140002.png
Screenshot 2025-07-09... png
(179.89 KB, 1385x1107)
 >>/103535/
not a single word is right, I am sorry but to even consider that Jews controlled Tsarist Russia is beyond stupid and to mix the Bolsheviks in shows how much ignorant you truly are on this basis 

and no its not the jews this time who undermined Byzantium they tried but the 4th crusade kikes who did it no sugar coating stuff 

you guys are anti intellectual tbf 


the sentence that the Bolsheviks are Jewish immigrants are totally false they were ethnically but they could never ever start the red revolution without Germany and wall street financial institution.

 >>/103534/
you are so wrong on every bit of information its insane !

yo ureally do believe that Rasputin ruled sh8t ? he did not rule his own a$$, yes he became influential but most of it is just rumors from the britsh and the french to discredit the Royal family 

I am going to give you some Well-Regarded Historical Sources:
“Rasputin: Faith, Power, and the Twilight of the Romanovs” by Douglas Smith (2016)

One of the most detailed biographies in recent years.

Shows how Rasputin had real but narrow influence, mostly regarding church appointments and a few ministerial suggestions.

Documents how aristocrats, the Duma, and Western journalists exaggerated his role to undermine the monarchy.

“The Romanovs 1613–1918” by Simon Sebag Montefiore

Montefiore covers Rasputin within the broader Romanov dynasty context.

Points out how Rasputin’s relationship with Alexandra became a symbol used by liberals and revolutionaries to stir public anger.

“A People's Tragedy: The Russian Revolution 1891–1924” by Orlando Figes

Focuses on how Russian JEWs, newspapers, and foreign agents framed Rasputin as the face of everything corrupt about Tsarist Russia.

Explains Rasputin was a symptom of the system’s weakness, not its cause.

The Hoax of the “Mad Monk” Narrative:

French and British wartime propaganda illustrated Rasputin as a German agent because Tsarina Alexandra was German.

Newspapers like The Times (London) and Le Matin (Paris) published sensational stories with little evidence.

Douglas Smith’s work specifically debunks this in detail.

Please read

thumbnail of soviet jews.jpg
thumbnail of soviet jews.jpg
soviet jews jpg
(98.83 KB, 796x602)
thumbnail of confused.jpg
thumbnail of confused.jpg
confused jpg
(29.79 KB, 313x361)
 >>/103536/
 >>/103537/
 >>/103538/
You're not just going to be banned in silent, you dense, dimwitted piece of shit. You're going to be countered on the false information you have given. What pathetic, half literate squealing. Even Slav anon is significantly more understandable than you, and English is not his first language. What a deluded apologist for the Romanov regime, now clutching at selective facts like straws, while ignoring the ocean of Jewish subversion that drowned Russia. I will gut each argument one by one, exposing the rot beneath your sentimental Tsarist fantasies.

Russian banking and the Rothschilds, you foolishly boasted that Tsarist Russia had no Rothschild central bank, as if I ever made that claim in the first place. Your strawman does not absolve them of Jewish financial domination. While the State Bank was nominally government-run, who financed Russia’s industrialization? Who underwrote its bonds? The Ginsburgs, Poliakovs, and Zak banking dynasties, all Jewish, controlled vast sectors of Russian finance. The Rothschilds themselves funded Russian railroads through proxies like the Crédit Mobilier. By 1914, Russia’s debt to Jewish-controlled investors in France was 8.5 billion gold rubles, making it utterly dependent on foreign capital. The Tsar’s own ministers (Witte and Kokovtsov) were economic globalists who opened Russia to Jewish investment. Your "state control" was a joke. A strong nation does not beg for loans from Parisian Jew speculators.

Byzantium and the fourth Crusade, you whined about the Crusaders’ sack of Constantinople, yet continued to ignore the real destroyers. The Byzantine eli­tes themselves, who squabbled like rats over titles while the Turks gathered at the gates. The Jewish merchant oligarchs who controlled Byzantine trade, strangling its economy. The weakness of Orthodox leadership, which failed to unite Christendom against Islam. A true empire does not collapse because of one military defeat. Byzantium fell because it was rotted from within, just like Tsarist Russia. 

Rasputin and the Romanov collapse, you cited Douglas Smith and Montefiore, bourgeois historians who whitewashed the Romanovs’ incompetence. Rasputin did wield immense influence over the Tsarina, who blocked competent ministers at his whim. The Duma and aristocracy hated Rasputin because he exposed their corruption, not because of "British propaganda." The Tsar allowed that Jew employing illiterate mystic to dictate policy while ignoring the coming Bolshevik storm again, you dense mother fucker, to the point that Jews violently murdered the last Tsar and his entire family'. Your beloved Romanovs were weak, decadent, and doomed, just like the Habsburgs and Hohenzollerns.

The Bolshevik Revolution, your most laughable claim is that the Reds were not Jewish-dominated. The Central Committee of the Bolsheviks was majority Jewish in 1917. Trotsky, Zinoviev, Kamenev, Sverdlov, all Jewish. The first Soviet government was packed with Jews from the Pale. Yes, Germany helped Lenin return to Russia, to destabilize the Tsar, not because the Kaiser loved Bolshevism. Wall Street funded the Revolution because Jewish bankers (like Jacob Schiff) wanted Russia. You cannot stay on this board if all your goal ever is, is to whitewash Jew involvement. The Bolsheviks were a Jewish movement, just as the Frankfurt School is.

Orthodox Christianity’s failure, you wailed about "Holy Russia", yet ignored that the Orthodox Church blessed the Tsar’s alliance with Jewish-financed Britain and France in WWI. It failed to rally the people against the Bolsheviks, collaborated with the Soviets after the Revolution. Where was your "Christian resistance"? Nowhere. Because faith without racial instinct is useless. Your entire argument is nostalgic nonsense. The Romanovs were weak. The Orthodox Church was weak. The Russian people were betrayed by both. Only National Socialism, racialist, anti-Jewish to the core, could have saved Russia. But now? It is too late, too betrayed and infiltrated. Just as Germans were betrayed countless times.

thumbnail of school-time.jpg
thumbnail of school-time.jpg
school-time jpg
(398.85 KB, 900x598)
One final statement:

Every single jew is an immigrant, born in whichever nation they reside or not. They do not belong. They are always parasites wherever they are. This is where idiot modernists and National Socialists differ. You fools think to be born in a nation means belonging there. It does not. When their predecessors were not born there, children of immigrants = immigrants.

thumbnail of 1659310669179866.jpg
thumbnail of 1659310669179866.jpg
1659310669... jpg
(118.94 KB, 773x1187)
thumbnail of 1651325029272.jpg
thumbnail of 1651325029272.jpg
1651325029272 jpg
(193.41 KB, 1024x938)
thumbnail of Case_study_Banque Hottinguer_uk.pdf
thumbnail of Case_study_Banque Hottinguer_uk.pdf
Case_study... pdf
(468.24 KB, 0x0)
thumbnail of Snapchat-2073050550_20240701093158.jpg
thumbnail of Snapchat-2073050550_20240701093158.jpg
Snapchat-2... jpg
(158.77 KB, 1080x1920)
thumbnail of f11be9778d6f4b48fb6ee8baa5cf4454.jpg
thumbnail of f11be9778d6f4b48fb6ee8baa5cf4454.jpg
f11be9778d6... jpg
(1.97 MB, 2399x3552)
 >>/103537/
So you give no rebutal but retarded strawmann of someone stuck in 1905 i see.
Okay again what was bellis affair? Who had the most jews in europe back then? 
Russia
Who industrialized russia to begin with?
Ginsburg poliakov zak banking barons
Who owned credit mobilier ie builderbehind trans siberian railway
Who helped to fund trans siberian railway
Hotinguer family
> But they are no jewish

Explain founder of family be able to write hebrew and aramic then with pdf in post
Who had under thumb royal dutch shell if i want to pull oil on topic before siezure after revolution
I can go on and on evrn to byzantine empire and the awful coincidences in their trade system and proto private sector (ie jewish merchants) lobbying that influenced them to their doom 
> Bolsheviks werent jewish immigrants

And thats where you signed up for your biggest ass whooping in your life that even this site wont hold with its image limit per post
https://jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/4887-danilevsky#anchor58
https://archive.org/details/encyclopedia-judaica-volume-22/Encyclopedia%20Judaica%2C%20Volume%201/page/324/mode/2up?q=Russia
Now dont come back until you chugged at once both books


thumbnail of Miller - sketch.png
thumbnail of Miller - sketch.png
Miller - sketch png
(33.1 KB, 702x862)
 >>/103540/
Hmmm I think OP may have been Russian / Orthodox Christian and was just really hopeful that the Russian Empire and Religion was on par with NSDAP at one point. 

I'll just give OP the benefit of the doubt that he really doesn't know what was going on. 

Not even I knew what was going on in Tsarsist Russia.
 >>/103534/
 >>/103535/
 >>/103540/
I'll save all of this for later. Shame since I thought so highly of the Empire. 

Hopefully OP will read all the info on this thread

> You took a wrong turn,
Didn't see OP hate on anything NSDAP/AH related here though. Just mostly Pro Russian empire things. Maybe he can write a good ban appeal explaining himself and what. Since it sort of sounds like he's a new poster here. 

 >>/103530/
> moving on, this did set in the stage for new geopolitical game where the Ottomans became so strong they almost took Vienna and swallowed all of Europe.
Yeah it was pretty bad. You really had to live through that era to know how bad things were though.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Turkish_War

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_League_(1684)

> and no nazi Germany,
> nazi
That's a Bavarian slur word OP

 >>/103537/
> without Germany and wall street financial institution
Yeah Kaiser's Germany let Lenin go into Russia I believe.
Again, maybe OP is a new poster and doesn't know any better. Not even I knew about most of the things posted here.


 >>/103569/
> Not even I knew what was going on in Tsarsist Russia

Politically it was an hellscape that was bound to blow off as you cannot excersise mercy to people.that want you dead 
From peasants perapective outside of metropols sure it was calm mostly but just pointing out the bellis affair should hint that it was compromised from bottom to up
> Yeah Kaiser's Germany let Lenin go into Russia I believe.

Depends on optics
Since kaiser didnt give a green light to operation or govermentnitself and it was only under the banner for legal reasons then it shouldnt count much

> Again, maybe OP is a new poster and doesn't know any better. 

Look with such an arrogant posturing not many earned eagerness



Post(s) action:


Moderation Help
Scope:
Duration: Days

Ban Type:


13 replies | 12 file
New Reply on thread #103530
Max 20 files0 B total