>>/polru/664499@630693
So, I analyzed an isolated case: the post >> Polru/664277@664257 is good, the complaint is unfounded, and if you really want to ban someone, you need to ban the offended.

Now let's move on to the big picture. Software.
Where does the noise come from, where does the controversy and discontent come from?
People seek satisfaction through the attainment of values. But the value is the path itself, the experience and the development.
And the very meaning of this value is that it should be acquired not once and for all, but constantly. Development is only development when it is continuous. But not everyone understands that.
A significant problem is the emergence of information bubbles. These are comfort zones, but they are developmental.
We should not turn https://endchan.org/polru into an information bubble. No matter who or how they push us to do this.
Because I know from my own perspective that I'm not in an information bubble. I came to test the challenge, criticize my beliefs, learn new things, and re-sort what I know. As mentioned above, this process is constant.
Therefore, I propose to abandon turning into an information bubble. Refuse unreasonable moderation. Refuse to please the least critical posters. Reject absurd hoaxes: AI, Lakhta, etc.
What do I suggest instead? Have courage, curiosity, morality. Liberalize and make moderation impartial. Tolerance for dissent. Consider dissent as inevitable. Consider dissent appropriate.
There are exciting things happening in the world. We shouldn't be in a comfortable bubble at this time. We should not miss the opportunity to feel the world around us, feel emotions, think, doubt and argue with others and with ourselves.
Those who choose to be afraid and burn will always burn. No bubble will be comfortable enough for them. Shall we let them burn?
A bubble is not a defense against trolling and lamb. They use the image of Lakhta to justify pushing endchan.org/polru in the direction of the bubble. As free people, we will be empowered to define trolling, formulate measures and implement policies. This will be possible because we understand ideas and engage in internal discussion rather than walling off ideas.