>>/10821/
Status on:
> . Storage layer: data on at least two storage devices
Cahotically, yes
> . Networking layer: use P2P tech or something for accessibility and distribution - can use multiple computers of yours
Working on it slowly, but as of now, no.
> . Better speed and propagation: use non-shitty technology for better I/O operations, upload speeds, and whatever else (like data processing)
Nope
> . Organization layer: use whatever, such as IPFS's MFS to organize everything (can take a long time)
Nope, but looking into. 
> . Money: +speed, +propagation, better/more tech, and +redundancy - including whatever thing where it's basically required that you pay for it (such as Filecoin and Arweave)
Also no.

 >>/10785/
Was often pressed for space, lol, I have some stuff laying around somewhere from 2014 that probably is 240p or worse. To be fair though, at that time it was just personal archiving. Noted on 480p.



 >>/10824/
> The following is maybe off topic, but I since this thread already has that post about file sharing I didn't want to split this into a different thread:
I think it fits with before. 

 >>/10837/
Will check it out, actually, need to expand my coverage of non-english FiM in general. 

Speaking of that, old Italian  opening of FiM is the best!
https://youtube.com/watch?v=7FVqFN_Hn20
> https://invidious.private.coffee/watch?v=7FVqFN_Hn20