Actions
(92.96 KB, 616x613)
(270.55 KB, 1334x750)
pfp from > https://web.archive.org/web/20241121042541/https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=87sfGlIRJRk&list=PLVmM0UVcquYLx7mnB2WvG3-n1EXCI6GTd&index=26 - title="PRAYSE BE THE FOUNDERS - Let's Play Creeper World 4 [Campaign Mode] - Part 21 - Finale" That channel has only playlists, no My Little Pony-focused ones. Other image=iPone seeing/detecting a face in an MLP image. >>/11338/ I also have some concerns about webrtc (web real-time communications) for privacy and maybe also security reasons. OK, so something like a thread summary of the current thread (or recent posts in it). Then state the current thing I'm doing. Philosophy quote related to this discussion: > Moreover, because philosophy essentially exists in the element of universality, which encompasses the particular within itself, it might seem that even more so than in the other sciences, in philosophy what is indeed salient about its subject matter, even its perfect essence, would be expressed in the goal of the work and in its final results, and that the way the project is in fact carried out would be what is inessential. In contrast, if a person were to have only a general notion of, for example, anatomy, or, to put it roughly, if he were to have an acquaintance with the parts of the body taken in terms of their lifeless existence, nobody would thereby think that he has come into full possession of the salient subject matter of that science, which is to say, its content. One would think that in addition he would have to go to the trouble to pay attention to the particularities of the science. – Furthermore, that kind of an aggregation of little bits and pieces of information has no real right be called science, and a conversation about its purpose and other such generalities would be in no way distinct from the ordinary historical and uncomprehending way in which the content, that is, these nerves and muscles, and so forth, is itself discussed. In the case of philosophy, this would give rise to the following incongruity, namely, that if philosophy were indeed to make use of such a method, then it would have shown itself to be incapable of grasping the truth. From https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/works/ph/pinkard-translation-of-phenomenology.pdf from https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/index.htm > marxists I mostly disagree with Leftism. (That PDF = philosophy as the main topic and not politics, titled "The Phenomenology of Spirit".) Types of information, knowledge, and activities as related to the project or posts in this thread: (1.) The driving tendency, true assertions, and actually doing the activity (2.) The results as crystallized into clear, possibly chronological statements: like or being a summary. So much of type (1) and not a lot of type (2). I did a thread summary earlier ITT and got kinda burned out on doing that so quit. Type (2) definitely takes effort to do, and I feel like I'm repeating myself. However, without clear summaries of everything that happened in these threads, that overview or summary knowledge could be lost or never really existed in the first place. It's an arduous task, and reminds me of something else stated in that Hegelian book which said something like "the true form/shape of truth is a scientific one." So what it reminded me of is that you have to both do the "real activity" and at the same time understand it/itself in a clear way going into the future (forgot the exact words). >>/11330/ > weird IPFS URL/CID That's base256emoji, part of multiformats/multibase. See the following for a shell script to convert CIDs to that, plus base16, etc. in CGI in GNU/Linux: > https://github.com/ProximaNova/proximanova.github.io/zipball/master > https://codeload.github.com/ProximaNova/ipfs-kubo-rpc-api-for-cgi/legacy.zip/main I mostly modified existing code to work for in Apache specifically. It uses node/nodejs, these files specifically: > https://github.com/ProximaNova/proximanova.github.io/blob/main/converting-between-cid-versions/index.js