>>/1218/
> They are 
 YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH. What a plot twist 

> For anything beyond normal politics that I am remotely believe it goes into back into what I said earlier, don't believe in a jew lizard man conspiracy to take over the world and that X was a paranormal event.
If something is paranormal,expect some kind of yellow journalism surrounding it.

> it is still a little creepy how the official explanation actually omits info. In fact that's how I'd say that it's easier then you'd think to be a conspiracy nut. 
These days,you can be considered a conspirator
 just because you ask or despise what they say on the news. What standards of conspiracy. I thought being a conspirator was about aliens,Area 51 and stuff but goddamn,we are asking about our actions and info that arrives into our senses. 

> Because you will find official/commonly pushed explanations by supposed experts that don't align with all the facts (Pop skeptic Benjamin Radford insistence that the Dyatlov Pass incident must have been caused by an avalanche despite there being no evidence of one and completely ignoring the presence of radiation being a rather stupid example that had a backfire effect.) . 
Even when they lie,they fit into the stupid zone easily. It never fails. The way they explain the facts is almost an alternate reality. Almost like putting the news as a show or something. They repeat their scripts like parrots and profit.

> Usually though it's as you said, for political reasons.
Yep,think it as a game of strategy. Even though I am not the biggest fan of map games nor I have played them(Hearts of Iron or Universalis), it's mostly strategy. Always ask yourself if X thing happens,then who wins? What interests does this bring? Are the players playing well their cards? Things like that.
Instead of being triggered nor putting the tinfoil hat,just wait before putting any opinion into the table. They are better seen when the events are no longer fresh.

> Perhaps were not too dissimilar then on that. As there is some lines that stick out to me like that too that do inspire some lines at least some of the few times that I have written to such music.
Yep. The best part is when you remember them when you don't notice nor they are forced to be remembered.

> Still had much more effort and care taken too them.
Definitely.
> Interesting to see how well we learned both to emulate and go beyond the shows style.
This is also why gen 4 will remain for a very long time. Not sure how much,but the impact and legacy is done.
> I can think of a few lesser known shorts that reach awful tier, the only one that I can think of that level that ever got any attention was Dusk's Dawn.
I was going to mention Dusk's Dawn instead of Double Rainboom. I shut my mouth about that and decided to put the other example. Dusk's Dawn is basically a fanfiction that makes no sense. It's like the Room,so bad that it's awful at being bad. It makes you laugh a bit but that's it.
As for the rest, the projects done out there stand by themselves and some of them don't age. 
> I've noticed that too. I've also notice even a up in quality in the cringe and edgy as well. cringy self insertion OC that is still badly designed, but not badly drawn, or Cupcakes fan art that is less memetic more subtly dark for example.
The 2000s are gone for better or worse. Deviantart is nothing new at all and it's expected to see cringy stuff from there,it barely impresses anyone at this point. There could be some good red and black OCs at this point. Hell,I would say that Tempest was designed with that cringy cliche in mind and well, the character with the greatest number of pictures from the movie.