>>/2533/
> I'm gonna have a ton of scraps to post there from my project.
well, we are going to reach the 400 post mark soon. So yeah, I see it coming.

> I had an original intent to bring have this done for Halloween simply because I like reading moderately spooky stuff then. Feels /comfy/
well, that´s a personal preference that one could only apply to himself and it has its own charm.

If you couldn´t apply it this year, why wouldn´t you read your own story months after posting it so you could not only enjoy it during that night but also getting your own feedback while getting comfy? 

 >>/2534/
> brings with it a less paranoid more old time laughs feel over those memes. 
yeah, having some old laughs to calm down a bit the tension every now and then.

> Probably makes it more effective.
it doesn´t work that much these days though. We have written down a lot of things from other countries and the progressive views are getting tiring really quickly.

> Rural family with really deep roots having a kid who is a an absolute leftist. There is heritage, and perhaps a bit of a regional identity as well that play into beliefs like that.
nailed it. Just that the kid here didn´t live in a rural but an urban family and went right wing instead of taking part of social movements from the youth. The regional identity is varied enough so that opens up to the personal conclusions.

> Democrats have enough power to cause a ruckus (they have alrendy started to fight each other! Hate to know what is going to emerge from that leftist bloodbath in 2 years) and the Republicans have just enough power to fight them even if it's digging their own grave too
the problem with the in-between fights is that they also affect outsiders and not only themselves. I wouldn´t live in Cali if that ruckus is staying permanent. Expect false flag moves, guilty claiming to other groups and demagogic techniques coming out of this. Be ware of that and the collateral damages.

> Populist power has suddenly shifted the balance away from the traditional lobbing structures, which results in the elections of far more ideologically driven candidates though they still have enough influence to push for there interests. 
that explains the polarizing situation. The old columns have been destroyed and replaced with more emotionally driven votes.

> This in turn causes gridlock, which causes the states exercising powers (like only Texas did before) that the federal government had tried to do away with.
someone has to apply that power and organization. That line by itself is absurd comedy, achieving results that they didn´t expect at first. If they didn´t exercise powers, the country would most likely go to shit. It causes more decentralization though. 

> I just have enough of a few traits that occlude me from most factions on either side. I'd probably be a somewhat blatantly more right wing version of you over there... or apolitical. 
probably Ross Perot fits you the most in the sense that he had liberal views on that and most likely Trump, as hellish his image may be from the democratic propaganda, is just another version of past politicians that had written the script for him. There are some /pol/fags that consider him too bland and that he is just another product for supporting Israel

You would vote the conservatives from the 90s (they had a very liberal project)in my country without a doubt.