(226.73 KB, 753x1062)
(790.19 KB, 1024x1024)
>>/2581/ > what I am linking quoting* I don´t want to dox nor anything like that, because that´s a cheap tactic nor I encourage aaany army (/pone/ nor any chan has been the personal army of anyone)but I am for sure that I have not invented those lines. >>/2581/ > Sometimes it´s not the material what I value the most but the artist´s mentality as well. and I will prove that statement. https://derpibooru.org/1850829?q=seapony+%28g4%29 You know, I like checking what new pictures are on that tag (I am sucker of that species, I am not going to lie) But anyway, here´s the actual matter. I may be harsh on the previous post but I have my lax/nice side as well. The image itself didn´t interest me that much at first because you know, I wanted movie characters content but what changed my opinion was how the artist said this: > The scan you see here is released under a CC-Licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/). > Soo…. nothing stops you from downloading the file (at full size you should be able to just about see every detail) and turn it into a poster print. It’s free and you’re absolutely allowed to do it :) and guess who replied to that comment on public. I went to his profile and clicked favorites on several images that were pretty nice that same day. In fact, >>/2478/ came from him and I am posting the original as well. Even though the content from an artist is in danger of edits and such, anyone will actually find the original in the end and guess the actual owner sooner or later. Those who diffuse your images may seem that they like they own it but nobody does, they just only amplify the interest and noise to ask who actually created that image in the first place. Now, I am not saying that my philosophy is 100% right nor that I have the absolute reason. I am a faggot that only types a few shitposts on chans with a keyboard. But time always reveals the truth and much more these days with the internet. I am capable to praise others that are more honest or humble even if their art is not so great or not as famous as others who are elitists. I put King Crimson as an example of influential artists and they are that big. Revolutionary yet besides my time on these posts, my praise won´t be focused on them because the main musician gets pretty mad for anything when it comes to possession and money. Instead, I prefer praising Rush (nice rec by the way), Yes, Spiritualized (I admire Jason Pierce as a person as well, his interviews are really humble, I have to make a fic because of his music someday), Wilco and Burial to name a few spending my time on what they do because they know that the internet won´t prevent anything since Napster´s creation. So, there is a lot of material going on and those who put me restrictions won´t receive that much yet others who show themselves "naked" and open to the public...I say, take my money or praise. Now I feel better after saying this.