thumbnail of 1460747__safe_artist-colon-plotcore_spike_twilight+sparkle_dialogue_dragon_equestria_female_mare_mountain_pony_scenery_scenery+porn_subtitles_sunset (1).jpeg
thumbnail of 1460747__safe_artist-colon-plotcore_spike_twilight+sparkle_dialogue_dragon_equestria_female_mare_mountain_pony_scenery_scenery+porn_subtitles_sunset (1).jpeg
1460747__safe_artist-... jpeg
(2.31 MB, 3000x2250)
 >>/3124/
> But with the V 2.0 CAPTCHA and it´s lag, it would require even a better timing.
It's not that much matter of a lag but it's predictability. If it's always consistently high You could plan that ahead.
t. someone speaking always from the theory

> Just that I don´t look for them with as much enthusiasm as I had before, not because of the luck but because I won´t beat the repeating 7 digits, much less with the activity dropping over the board. It´s reduced because of personal will and betting for it more directly.
Understandable

> yeah, you are basically saying that I could use the editor for modifying the text
That was just my regular "How can any proof be real, if our eyes aren't real: the post"

> Lying to one self
Is this even possible? No matter how hard I tried, the me just saw straight through my lies. It's like I lived in my head and knew I was going to lie to myself or something.

Also I may have overshot. After a bit of thinking, faking a fingerprint of SSL certificate would probably require knowing the private key (I'm not that much knowledgeable in that stuff). Photoediting the fingerprint after the fact is another thing.

> They could have applied the 3.0 instead
Uh, 3.0? You mean the 3.0? As in, the one were you don't get to type anything nor check any boxes, but instead get judged entirely on whether your IP address is kosher or not, and only by that alone?
I'd take 2.0 over 3.0 any day.