>>/3158/
> I'm also not allergic to namefags and tripfags per se (although I went on with the rising tide of the anti-name/trip of recent years). 
it´s not like I care too much but yeah, it can perfectly feel like Ponychan and I don´t see us jumping into that level of circlejerk.

> despite that I've still refrained from using a tripcode or role signature in places where it was actually appropriate >implying me contributing. I guess I have some sort of fetish for the anonymity of the chans ethos.
yeah, anonymity is a bless. I suppose I will keep the same dynamic. Save for fresh content, I certainly don´t need to use that option.

> The plus (maybe not for them) side is that they're not portable.
huh, what a curious detail

> As it should be, in principle. Death of the author
in an imageboard, nobody knows that you are a pony!

> seeing every post with tripcode and 5-10 people avatarfagging tbh avatarfagging tips me off more than tripfaggotry with the same set of images over and over was rather cringy experience tbh... I get the same feeling when I visit ponychan once in a while.
erm, I dont´t have a huge gallery to begin with. I will try to rotate and add new images but I have to reuse them sometimes. Not in the levels as MLPG does every time but I am yet in the process to post different stuff. 

> the general sentiment against using tripcodes rose in force over recent years, so many decided to drop them.
especially when there are conspirators in /pol/ that claim that social media bosses/google/CEO are trying to kill anonymity. That could explain why there is a big rejection these days. (and let´s not enter in the political topic again but that truly is a shitshow)