Actions
(162.2 KB, 960x960)
>>/3927/ > I think it was a modget, but a lowkey one the usual modget flavour to avoid any flak like last time yeah, it´s a forgettable one. Only channers know how to make interesting GETs as usual (just like the triforce) > What saddens me is the near unanimous commenters approval to modgets to "ensure that GETs are safe for everyone". I guess I'm like Discord in this case. Let the chaos happen. yeah, I suppose I agree with you on that part. Everything seems to run on a safe script that is made to be big but only ends up having way less impact than it should. Everyone would be making drama and remembering the GET if it was clop/edgy/shipping (imagine if it was a Flashlight pic...) image. There would be a special attachment to it despite its quality and would cause several funny reactions. > it seems like it didn't occur to him to use different IPs and/or accounts to upload images to circumvent rate limit despite being aware of it. Like, c'mon, it's almost like you wanted the GET to fail. without that detail, more users would have suspicions about the system. I don´t know what´s worse: either the GET tracker or Derpimods at circlejerking that they have "achieved" a safe GET. >>/3930/ I don´t know but they didn´t care about their teeth around that period so I recommend them a little bit of toothpaste from Colg.... I mean, Minuette.