thumbnail of 52405 pc + mobile edit.jpg
thumbnail of 52405 pc + mobile edit.jpg
52405 pc + mobile edit jpg
(455.09 KB, 1280x821)
 >>/4107/
> it is coming I think
it has actually arrived. Checked. My proper reply to it though...

> Let's just say there is a certain country that a lot of them went to and a certain poster here may have a connection to them... 
I mean I do believe that I have more connections with South America than Italy despite its distance  mostly because the former is the son and the latter is the neighbor Also, I am too focused on my own stuff to even care and it´s really difficult to trigger me about this  I can get triggered but not because of the perspective exactly. Go ahead if you want. 


 >>/4109/
before I get to reply your semi ironic shitposts....I do believe that I would locate these pictures  >>/4107/ and  >>/4109/ with much more ease in the edit thread and as you say, the latter shows feels more unique in terms of originality. It´s probably the least clichéd image that you have posted so far.

> can you call a post art when it is just a shitpost
depends on the intentions behind and the results... A shitpost may be a shitpost but I apply that logic even to porn, music, etc. Not all porn works for clop nor even brings anything to get pleasure from it. So with this mindset, I do believe that good shitposts require some effort behind them or at least, a good phrase/meme/picture to make it memorable.

> Yet this is trying to be art though it fails at it even if it doesn't 
I believe that you are applying the same words that I had posted while I was experimenting with the flaws for the first time, breaking the mold and attempting to deconstruct the image with an unpleasant direction. I would have posted this edit on the compilation if you had made it sooner because it´s definitely weird or at least, it doesn´t seem to have just one effect from the Photoshop itself.

Although...

 >>/4110/
this image sums up pretty well that the concept of ART may not be the brightest perspective to take into account. This has been parodied to hell for modern art (for good reasons). Yet when someone is attempting to be that bad on purpose, maybe the conclusion doesn´t come off with that much of a negativity.

> Isn't that on the general consensus to decide
well, there are a few albums that I know which were pretty bad received at their time and now they have acquired a much better status.....but that means that the base material had to offer something by itself. 

 >>/4113/
> you don't realize that art isn't real right? It's only actions.
you are reminding me of Picasso again. Art might not be art by itself but an expression of our minds. 

the image is trash on purpose although I will say that the purple effect and the blurriness would make it a vaporwave album cover or something

> I HAVE ANYCORE belifes whicch is impossible, there is none.
then I should conclude that nothing I see in this board is real...except the time that I have spent on it. That counts as something so it exists.

> I'm probably borderline anti-intellectual in art.
but you know, antiinllectualism by itself isn´t inherently that bad as long as you want to pick exactly what´s wrong with them. In this case, you want to parody art (modern art) by making shitposts like these yet you are trying to have your own sense of elitism...

And by the way, humans have always been stupid. We are the only species to fall onto the same rock twice (maybe even more times) just that we see the nakedness of such retarded thoughts because of the internet with so much ease.