>>/4163/ 
Welp, do to some IRL stuff this is my only entry for today. It is basic entry. There is still probably a couple of other facts that I could note but this is just me getting a feel for what entries will be like. Note, I haven't even tried to get the game running yet and it is not a priority at the moment. Adding entries wanton like this could be a bit messy but I think I see how I'll organize it more uniformly by the next thread  with a more insane idea possibly in the cards for later  This is one of the games I talked about in  >>/4051/ and was the easiest to make a partial entry for since I already finished most of it and only had to get  a few archive links. It's kind of haunting because I have ran into the project several times over the years and never regarded it much.

I am also considering a status system.
Active Ongoing, normal activity.
Semi-active Updates slowly/randomly but not rarely.
Inactive Updates rarely and randomly.
Abandoned Has not updated in a space exceeding a year (maybe 2 years would be better) with other online activity having little to no mention of the project, and or has disappeared online completely. Also possibly confirmation from the creator his/herself. 

Other possible tags that I'm less sure on.
Hiatus For  periodical fanworks, this could be used in a few slightly different ways, but I see it where a creator has put it on hold for a  various amounts of time, and as long as the give updates and do not announce otherwise it staying in that state. 
Canceled for works that are explicitly stop there works and making abandoned only for works that are, well, abandoned without explanation.
Completed
Works that are fully completed and finished in the creator's eyes.

 >>/4098/
I've been giving it some thought and I think that for now I will be a bit more liberal in my remarks and notes for now. After all I'm still trying to get my baring and if I'm constantly worrying about "does this fit /go/?" it would amount to self-constraining myself and prevent ideas from happening. Besides, what I discus and what I present fully in the formal entries can be different and separate. 

So basically what you say here.
> life is risky as hell. Sometimes we have to jump into the void and get ready to improvise for the worst.   


> it seems a fairly reasonable theory, using the rules to your taste (which any person in the power would use that path easily). 

> what difference does she make above the rest? No seriously, I am surfing on her top rated NSFW stuff and it makes literally ZERO difference from what you would expect about any other character. Is it because of a ship? Is it because of grotesque stuff

The context from what I can gather is that he has a strong attachment to Dolores and didn't like seeing her in certain situations so he'd delete pictures he didn't like of her at his own whim and everybody else wanted him to make it a formal rule rather than an unwritten thing he just did arbitrarily. It just seems, tbh, stupid, but also a little weird. I mean I think to myself: what if I was there and liked to avatarfag/post previously allowed pictures of Dolores? Would he have barred me from the practice? Think of how arbitrary it is, I can do that with any other character but Dolores . I would probably leave but note my displeasure strongly... but than again, not my circle jerk and I'm only thinking of hypotheticals, so why should I care?