>>/6100/
> he mad
So, above all else, /night/ is supposed to, I'd assume, be contemplative. Somehow I managed to step on a nerve and get you riled. Let's try to take this down a notch, and reconsider:

I posted a video with a few minutes of tones, originally posted hoping to encourage healing thoughts, IE a mellow, meditative mood. The uploader speaks about 432/440 elsewhere, though not on this video, so I'm actually just assuming it's tuned to the 432 standard.
And for comparison I post ... a 4-year old smacking a drum set.
It's okay to laugh, as you should have gotten the joke by now.

> those who are promoting the 432 Hz frequency are record companies
Seriously? I've never once in my life heard someone try to sell me something when talking about the 432 standard. Rather, they recommend avoiding all commercial music because it's unhealthy for you, and they have generators produce healing tones (uhm, okay...) roughly in the same vein as folks might grow their own vegetables to avoid GMO crops.

> more of a marketing move than all the toy commercials of Hasbro
really? I mean, "Buy our toys REAL HARD" really?

> these theories have no actual scientific studies/reports from serious universities
I've seen some okay math. It's from laymen, but it seems plausible. Fibonacci sequence figures heavily into it.

I stand by what I said -- the 432 standard yielded a set of chords that felt cooperative, harmonious. The 440 stand sounded raucous. Don't get me wrong, there's a place for raucous music. Have you heard of Rock 'n' Roll? The style works well with raucous chords. But if you're wanting something more contemplative, that won't jar your conscious mind, I suspect I'd prefer the 432 stuff.
But since I don't buy music anyway, I'll probably just have to take what I can get.