>>/6961/
> that whole first two walls of text

I did not even read this, I'm not reading a longform response to a joke.
If the big bold red lettering didn't get the point across, it was a joke!
you know they say not being able to understand humor is a sign of autism...
> all your other points.
There isn't really much for me to respond here other than thanks for agreeing with me. I guess that ends the argument.

 >>/6962/
> now, I know that you were tired and that you have considered that I was trying to discourage you without giving you much background history before. It´s true that I jumped onto your thesis without letting you much space like  >>/6960/ has pointed out.
> In exchange, I am letting you to have a time in order to see your own post calmly, read it again with all the time that you need and reconsider what you have stated... because in the figurative sense (for a debate), if I had to illustrate what has happened with these words of yours has gone like this:
> What you have done here is that you held a 44.Magnum, you gave it to me with the magazine loaded, without the safe mode and you left it in my hand in a position where I only have to use my finger to pull the trigger (without doing anything coming from my part). On top of that, you are begging to me to shoot at your head and the other two  >>/6955/ and especially  >>/6952/ have predicted the possible terrible fate by offering to you a couple of lifesavers before I do anything.
> It blows my mind how in a fairly reasonable post, you have decided to throw it all away in the semantics department (with very few lines which is outstanding to say the least) and I seriously don´t want to do this. The other posts will sound like a joke if you decide to stay convinced with your own assessment by resorting to this argument alone.
> I am not saying this because I am offended (far from it even, I don´t care about what you think about me honestly, I said it here  >>/6948/) but in terms of a debate, you aren´t exactly in a very convenient position to be honest.
> I seriously recommend that you analyze what you have just posted over here (with a laid back manner, don´t rush the answer) and see how it can possibly pan out by exposing that alone but don´t stay there because right now, the results could backfire dramatically on you.

God you don't stop talking even when you have nothing to say. This has to be the /pone/ version of "i'm a navy seal with over 300 confirmed kills." and you're just trolling, right?