>>/807/
> Yes, it´s dedicated to RGRE for being so selective, not close minded, but selective with what they want. I get their intentions but some contrast should show up. This chill happy green doesn´t serve for /mlp/ (for the most part) because of jumping into the gay or not gay territory so quickly, leaving no chance to look over the context or the actual content


Don't know to much on RGRE, but yeah something little like this won't hae enough time to develop an atmosphere to be able to have a chance to change minds with its concepts. 

> Those lines kill the purpose of being proud to choose that tendency of loving someone else. The decision is individual and it doesn´t represent anyone else nor it should be forced to put into the same category. 


All these labels can easily form such  "totalitarian collectives" or a blind will of a mob. The specification which they are doled out and formed don't help anybody. My relation to it is obsevring through my contact with SJW's though. Their attempts to erase catagories and allow freedom have backfired badly, with many different labels that are each there own mini identity, and people shrilling about if this or that is truely X? Which leads to splittering, yet the splittering becomes yet another label that will be debated and shrilled. Though I'm taling about SJW's I really mean it with anything.

TLTR: Labels not just used as an indentification of a thing, but as a strict exspectation of what that thing is, sometimes with a sense of indentity with it. 

> To communism. What can I say about it?


Communism can be uniroicly shrilled for in many places in the west, despite doing much of the same thing that various right wing factions did. Even the people who shrill against it by saying "It's stupid that the soviet union killed but because they were not racist they get away with it" No, I'm saying is that because many of the communist countries and movements were in fact pretty racist toward various groups that weren't the national majorities. Cossacks, crimian tatars, Tibet, etc. Even if they weren't always systematically killing them ouright, they were often supressing their language and culture with the clear intent to wipe them it as a group. 

> Poisoned for /mlp/, poisoned for the SJW, poisoned for those who get triggered by the images and poisoned for the extreme radical left. It´s a desire of being one self and using the rights to be an individual that doesn´t have intentions to harm anybody.

> Poisoned..


Oh, I get this. This is something that I've wondered and enterained about. These groups are not all consuming, but often places now are at least leaning to one or the other. Their are things that both don't accept and get triggered so easily with. I've wondered what it would be like if someone or something arose who was willing to trigger both in equal messure, so it's interesting for me to see you mention that. Both of these groups have become the fun police, attacking many who just want to be left out of it. This is a desire just to be.

> Yet, I show genuine fear by jumping in the swamp and writing about something I shouldn´t be doing becuase of how some will judge to this...


Really, I am a pretty chill dude. Even if this is not my taste, don't be afraid to mess around with stuff here that doesn't flow elsewhere. I doubt the other anon who used to come by would care either.  I mean we are on endchan for goodness sankes...   Though I don't now about the random stranger who posted in the Apple Jac Parents e thread yesterday  I really like the points you wanted to make with this which really rings with me.