>>/9727/
Those 8 ponibooru.org torrents are all online now (4 select and 4 all for 4 ratings of safe, explicit, questionable, and unrated). There's some others which are similar and offline; each of the below 3 have saved .torrent files, but the payload data is missing:

>  magnet:?xt=urn:btih:54a32d4a49a3fca4e14f54e8912fd8b77453c0b3&dn=ponibooru-comment-html.zip
>  https://web.archive.org/web/20230602095609/https://itorrents.org/torrent/54a32d4a49a3fca4e14f54e8912fd8b77453c0b3.torrent
totally gone

>  magnet:?xt=urn:btih:737d18417b16abd420886c6dfc8db1e12a1441cd&dn=Ponibooru-All-Safe-rar
>  https://web.archive.org/web/20230602174552/https://itorrents.org/torrent/737D18417B16ABD420886C6DFC8DB1E12A1441CD.torrent
was 44% online ~years ago, not sure about now

>  magnet:?xt=urn:btih:0bb67d65df5d995a1e8270c8f6e3fc26a8e244ce&dn=Ponibooru-All-Safe.zip
>  https://web.archive.org/web/20220617154841/https://itorrents.org/torrent/0BB67D65DF5D995A1E8270C8F6E3FC26A8E244CE.torrent
I tried to reconstruct this ~years ago because I had the timestamps on those files (2012 and such). I got "close" but was off by like one byte. Back then I didn't know the specifics about ZIP file timestamps and how very intricate they are.  >>/9568/ "As I learned from rescening ZIP files, both 7z and exiftool provide OK file lists, but their timestamps don't match perfectly to what the timestamp bytes in the ZIP file detail." Knowing that now, it makes that goal even more out of reach.

 >>/9638/
> download speed of up to 23 MB/s
I saw a download speed of 25.9 MB/s on https://put.icu/s/0nhlt3qu.mp4 = c84f70e48a76ae367b58f4fc19e646015cc0bd5c SHA1 (and 27.7 MB/s on possibly cached file https://put.icu/s/nav7ff9d.mp4 = 148af95ca8ed7ae5c272196747217bf3c4612837 SHA1). That site is ran by TPA guy  >>/9705/ ZizzyDizzyMC.

 >>/9852/
> references the CID for "Gingerbread Man" by The Residents  >>/9742/
(this one: https://gateway.pinata.cloud/ipfs/QmPQRuhy5ZJY4Do6wna7nn5BYeMnNUABxL95SDCzeHr7Ym = still online)