>>/11163/
okay anons
I am building this proof right now
to be very clear
this (if true) is a delta (unsure of number, could be a zero delta -top keks) of:
A POTUS tweet
and
an anon post (me) proofing a zero delta of a POTUS tweet
if this = zero delta...
does this become a legit proof of POTUS/Q+ comms on /end?
to be clear, I am looking for anons to check my work and slow my roll if I am sperging out over nothing
Godspeed
o7