Actions
>>/11513/ thank you for helping us think clearly about this, anon imo, anon isn't trying to make a Q proof anon is potentially proofing Q+ is monitoring this chan thats it not dropping intel not IDing some random anon as Q (why would that be the assumed premise?) did Q clearly state what delta were and were not for? would sincerely like to know what is in the drop history in this subject tyvm anons keep your eyes open see something, say something o7