>>/13499/ [–] CMAnon 2 points (+2|-0) 37 minutes ago What a Co-inky Dink! link reply ... [–] Q20191776 1 point (+1|-0) 49 minutes ago I like the way you think. link reply ... [–] rickki6 8 minutes ago SHUT THE FRONT DOOR! Awesome dig link reply ... [–] Revodude2 11 minutes ago A lot of state codes replicate federal codes. link reply ... [–] crazy_eyes 21 minutes ago I was hoping 187 was coming soon for someone link reply ... [–] amarQ144 23 minutes ago Nice link reply ... [–] Peplfxr 28 minutes ago He meant 182 new federal judges link reply ... [–] 1959model 1 point (+1|-0) 18 minutes ago Yeah but consider this. Based on a quick Wikipedia search there were just over 150 confirmed as of 09/30/19. If you include all the appointments pending in the Senate, there are over 200. Seems kind of random for him to tweat "182" specifically. All I'm saying is if it wasn't a message to Nancy, it should have been. link parent reply ... [–] BigFatDaddy 28 minutes ago That's the California Penal Code, though. Wouldn't the Trump team be looking at Federal statutes? link reply ... [–] Deplorable_Badger [S] 17 minutes ago Why not both? What must be shown/demonstrated to justify military tribunals to cleanse our republic? Enjoy the show.... link parent reply ... [–] lawyer4justice 17 minutes ago Not if the criminal conspiracy is based in California... California could have jurisdiction. If we only knew where Pelosi and Schiff were operating from... link parent reply ... [–] robertdebruce 31 minutes ago Good find. I like it!!!! link reply ... [–] nomoss 35 minutes ago Thanks for the information. link reply ...