>>/14030/
Notes collector (for this bread) here.
Entirely second that, just was a bit confused about the wording of your first protest, as anons were few this early morning, and the question was to merely find a possible sauce for these images (not assess veracity).

Your arguments actually reminded me to put a question mark behind the entry, and rightly so.
Your verification/dilligence (ending up to be the same sauce) made me remove it again.
Thanks once more!