>>/14997/
 >>/14995/

1-Sorry, I'm not a number or mathfag (really, you do not want me dealing with numbers, srsly)
I would not even know how to access the numbers here?

2-How are our memes doing?
This seems like info to put put in a War Room thread. I would dearly love for anons who share memes to report back the results, it would be really helpful to everyone. So far I've only seen one report. This has to be done voluntarily.

I don't have any social accounts - I have done digging, mini-buns, and many memes here (no need to update main spreadsheet, so this is how I can help rn). I also have slow & unreliable 'net connection.

One way to keep watch on hashtags, meme droppage and popularity is via TweetDeck for desktop - I think 4 columns max, you can monitor hashtags, keywords, people, etc. (I don't have bandwidth for that). If someone wants to do that and keep us updated, great!

3- Dig goals
It's good to keep tabs on what's being actively researched and what's falling through the cracks. I'm not sure gauging the results by # of posts is really an accurate measure. I've seen some really good results all in 2 posts, other really good results in many posts but only 1 item in each post. Sometimes also quantity != quality.

It would seem more efficient and ultimately productive for anons determine what avenue to research on a topic that may be broad:
-Bidens' corruption across multiple countries, involving shell companies
* Is it worthwhile to research all 500 shell companies? Will that help us ultimately? Or do we consider it settled that there are many shell companies and move on?

Anons know you are working very hard on this board, and everyone appreciates that a lot. I have seen that I will not be the first to tell you that anons self-organize. A top-down strategy does not and will never work with anons. Creating tasks and delegating orders will not work and while most will not say anything, it will rankle many, and there will be low participation and frustration. This is said honestly, kindly and with no accusation or offense intended, I have seen this myself over the years on both chans, over and over again.

What does work is self-organizing. For example in one document dump (wikileaks or FBI vault, can't recall), anons volunteered to take ten page increments to review, people posted which pages they would take, and then tagged their results to the initial post. Something like 500 pages was done in one day, no top-down, all self-organized and it ended in a timely manner with very good results that were actionable.

Another method that worked fairly well was making topic-dig specific threads - keeping the results of digs centralized for easier retrieval (rather than searching through General threads) and then announcing in the General thread the results of a dig, with a link and either call for help or review (same thing kind of). Anons could refer to that thread when they were looking for something on that topic, duplication of effort was lowered and the effort yielded better results. This was helpful to meme magicians and infograph-makers and other diggers alike.

1/2