>>/15013/ 

> 1-Sorry, I'm not a number or mathfag
what service or tools do you offer?
#####

> I would dearly love for anons who share memes to report back the results
#ustoo o/
########

> mini-buns
yes we need these, run 'm
########

tools
> keep watch on hashtags, meme droppage and popularity
> TweetDeck for desktop
add to twitter tools
#######

> I'm not sure gauging the results by # of posts is really an accurate measure
what do u suggest a method for guaging meme results? (postcount worke fine by me... we could count the number of times the entities name was stated.)
##########

> quantity != quality
quantity && quality
###########

> ultimately productive for anons determine what avenue to research on a topic
correct, have u seen the Position Open list  >>/15048/. (advicefags wanted too kek)
or the social list ideas of digs? starts about here >> >>/15205/
or the header dough call to action list?  >>/14960/
#########

> Bidens' corruption across multiple countries, involving shell companies
example of broad serching for beginners ^^^^ learn
> consider it settled that there are many shell companies and move on?
correct move forward, but never forget
################

> delegating orders will not work
whos listening???
##############

> I have seen this myself over the years on both chans, over and over again.
and yet here u are?
############

> What does work is self-organizing
yes, dont u <3 the board organization atm?
############

> For example in one document dump...
documents dont dump themselves
############

> anons volunteered to take ten page increments to review, people posted which pages they would take, and then tagged their results to the initial post.

Reworded for better understanding, for me

anons volunteered to [take ten page increments to review]
anons posted [which pages collection they would review]
anons tagged [their review collection results.]

anons volunteered to [build board]
anons posted [what positions are needed and what boards are running]
anons tagged [updates to the threads]

i dont see the problem?
###########


Another method that worked fairly well was making topic-dig specific threads - keeping the results of digs centralized for easier retrieval (rather than searching through General threads) and then announcing in the General thread the results of a dig, with a link and either call for help or review (same thing kind of). Anons could refer to that thread when they were looking for something on that topic, duplication of effort was lowered and the effort yielded better results. This was helpful to meme magicians and infograph-makers and other diggers alike.

> I agree, have u seen the biden call to action thread:  >>/14854/

these are just my opinions, anons take, leave what u want. 
(You) are here because (You) chose so.

I like your ideas and commentary and it helps us learn and grow. I have taken some of your information to heart and mind, hope you and others anons do as well. (You) are always welcome here advicefag o7

> also these minibuns <3 'm need moar. heres the thing. some of them need to be threads themself

for instance all of our main Call to digs
ukraine romainia pelosi xbiden turkey...
so u could go through previous threads and collect then create those threads for us? your choice.

again, apology if other info involved. will answer when and if i can. 
and again tyvm o7