ae0ae6e0580... jpg
(10.22 KB, 183x275)
>>/22831/
so, understanding how this has the potential to become a slide
ill take a stab at it anyway
this baker absolutely enjoys the beauty of the human form
but
am also aware of the subversive nature of pr0n, and its use as a weapon against a populace
as this anon understands it
the 'nefarious' element of pr0n is centered around 'inversion' and corruption of the 'ideal'
-inversion
probably not hard to imagine examples, but the cuckold/ incest getting pushed heavy is a prime example (of which there is a plethora)
gender 'bending' etc.
-corruption of the 'ideal'
making a complete mockery of the divine union of make and female
making a complete mockery of even the idea of a 'divine male' and a 'divine female'
taking the sacred and making it profane (this equally fits under inversion and corruption of the ideal -two sides of the same coin?)
so where does one draw a line?
> this is a free speech zone -we dont draw lines
-kek, understood
still wonder what anons think
in closing
>>/22831/
/stolen/