>>/23104/
> semi phot memory sees a msg stated - Reddit has pelosi and shiff covered
I don't know what you are talking about but the idea that you or we should focus on Graham and Romney is ridiculous and at least focusing on shaming Graham is counter-productive. I don't care what plebbit is doing, great memes don't come out of plebbit.

Anyone can use any memes or graphics they want, with or without approval

> sounding anon to me?
tripfaggotry is the diametric opposite of anon

 >>/23107/
> Romney
JUST GOT ELECTED, no Senate run for 4 moar years. He will not change his vote (against POTUS) due to followers, he's on a different level than vulnerable pols.

> Graham
> if
He's not getting replace from chairmanship. There is no point in shaming or targeting him to his followers either.

>  I think you are confused
I'm not high on drugs, so no. I've been doing this a long time, since before Q and all along.

You can call someone a shill for disagreeing with your approach or methods all you want, it doesn't make it so. You can have convos with yourself whenever you want, smoke as much weed as you can.
But-
The fact remains: some things work, others don't.

 >>/23113/
TY, very helpful