>>/23855/
> cant parse 'post baker friction'
me either anon
at this point we are spending way to much bred on this 
but hey, its late

maybe its like post modernism?

like we are in the time that is 'post' (after) significant baker friction 

and that is being disrupted by introducing baker friction?

but, I am the only baker here
BO is probably asleep (as he SHOULD BE, anon is always workin' -kek)

and I dont feel like ANYthing is rubbing up against me
baker_friction=false
post or otherwise 
disrupt away anons -kek

o7