>>/28066/ > UserID per thread is much more helpful fam I was thinking about this all morning and generally agree the last 3 days there has been obvious shillary but there has also been general confusion anons misquoting other anons as shills BO has thought both of the bakers were shills at one point or another posterID's would AT LEAST help to confirm anon is actually an anon shills will IP hop, so you wont necessarily be able to positively confirm all posts made by a specific shill in the bred (ex: ebot) example: some post that seems like it could be an anon, but really seems like divisionfagging or some other kind of shilling -click poster ID -check all other posts by that ID -ohh look at that its ebot well now you know you dont even have to entertain the question can just filter and scroll alternatively: -click poster ID -check all other posts by that ID -ohh look at that, its an anon who has done some heavy lifting on an important dig well now you know you probably have an oldfag on your hands who is merely expressing some 'tough love' at LEAST you can be reasonably sure its an actual autist (not shill) and respond in kind It's definitely not fool proof (ip hoping/ VPN/ Tor) I think it would be very useful for positively confirming an autist is an autist less useful for positively confirming a shill is a shill (but retard shills that dont ip hop mid-bread WILL be easy to spot) I sincerely feel this will help alleviate a lot of the confusion the ID's for each user change every bread, so, don't see how this leads to any kind of doxxing of anons definitely LESS SO than the enforced tripcodes do on bakers and board volunteers defintely worthy of further discussion o7