Actions
(640.1 KB, 800x440)
(131.37 KB, 697x554)
(584.16 KB, 500x549)
(494.12 KB, 570x622)
(495.85 KB, 1024x528)
Does POTUS have them in check re impeachment witnesses? No witnesses, weak case? Current witnesses, 1; sonland sonland 'i want nothing, no Quid pro Joe' w witnesses, wherz hunter. hunter started all this in UKR w his dad of course, he is part of the case if not hunter, POTUS wouldn't ask about bidens/UKR if POTUS doesn't ask, no impeachment if POTUS doesn't ask, ignoring his duty if hunter wasn't shady af, POTUS would need to ask appears like bidens trying to cover up by blaming POTUS and trying to impeach him b4 POTUS/Ppl find out everything Hannity will love that, 3 mil viewers; BOOM! So when they say no witness, say 'ok'. when they say witnesses, say 'wherz hunter'. all the fake pomp in the World is NOT going to hide checkmate ds try harder, running out of chances/ammo/Time Public waking up fake news ratings going down it's obvious like a shill it's over like a game which 2 have been winning all along? Master move: Vote all dems out, re-Elect POTUS, simple. Godspeed.