>>/308/
Here's a Q thread from a few hours ago that has been archived.
http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/223135450
Here's how it seems to me.
You have 4 Chan. And 4 Chan is where Q started, so, in that regard, 4 Chan is good. There are a lot of people typing there. On the other hand, it seems like a lot of people over at 4 Chan don't want Q there. Threads go fast, and get archived, and then become inaccessible.
I would argue that most of the activity should be taking place over at 4 Chan.
But then we have this one, Endchan.net/qrb and Endchan.net/qanonresearch
threads on these boards don't disappear unless there is hacking, and then, typically, the threads and boards come back. It really isn't as good as 4 chan, for the number of people and for the ability to stay up all the time. But it's better than 4 chan for some archival purposes, for shorter time frame archival.
And there's also Zero Net. Which I like because theoretically, it can't be brought off line. It seems hard to use, it might not actually work right, sometimes you post and it seems like you're shadow banned. But if you can get your content up there, it should stay.
From short term talking, to long term archiving, it seems like it goes 4 chan, to endchan, to Zero Net.
Here's the Zero Net URL.
http://127.0.0.1:43110/1DdPHedr5Tz55EtQWxqvsbEXPdc4uCVi9D/
As I understand it, 8 chan isn't supposed to be back until Sept 5 or Sept 6 in that area, and we've got about 3 weeks to kill, and it would be nice to have something that we can understand for that 3 week time period.
So, as I see it.
Use 4 Chan pol for most talking.
Use Endchan to put links to 4 Chan content.
Use Zero Net for links to 4 Chan content and for links to Endchan content.
Others could obviously see it differently, others might have a better system, but right now it doesn't seem like there is really any great solution.