(408.31 KB, 1458x1147)
(541.9 KB, 1403x1614)
(615.42 KB, 2849x1708)
(791.75 KB, 1692x2588)
(542.65 KB, 1645x1882)
DIG on OSET Institute, Eddie Perez & Philip Stark While recreating election thread, found a BUNCH of stuff on the OSET institute, Eddie Perez, and Philip Stark - big rabbit hole relating the FOX retraction of stuff Sidney was saying about Smartmatic election fraud. In Dec 2020, Perez came on Dobbs show to refute Sidney, after Smartmatic threatened to sue Fox. He was supposedly an expert (and neutral) source. https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/12/some_followup_information_about_the_smartmatic_factcheck_on_fox_comments.html Strange VID - ck it out here: https://endchan.net/qrbunker/res/10092.html#10161 Previously worked at HartInterCivic before Nov 2018: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20181105005297/en/Veteran-Election-Technology-Industry-Executive-Edward-Perez Has a coupla patents on voting machine stuff US8985435B2 and US10438433B2 https://www.osetfoundation.org/eddie-perez Turns out Perez is not neutral but pro-Biden: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/12/some_followup_information_about_the_smartmatic_factcheck_on_fox_comments.html OSET Institute promotes open sourcing elections software but this org positively SMELLS - another of its bigwigs is Philip Stark, the guy who was the disappearing NH auditor who also lied about Dominion GEMS software's ability to connect with the internet (said it couldn't - 2 guys on with Prof. David Clements said otherwise). https://endchan.net/qrbunker/res/9922.html#10020 Stark was formerly with VerifiedVoting and is currently suing the EAC - of which he is a "federally appointed advisor" - for meeting secretly with private vendors to change rules that allow voting machines to connect with the internet: https://freespeechforpeople.org/philip-stark-et-al-v-united-states-election-assistance-commission/ [This is STRANGE bc he claimed that GEMS can't connect - but it can - and can fractionalize votes] [If Stark is so "CONCERNED", why did he lie about GEMS to Clements et al in a taped interview - see above??] Conclusion: OSET is not what it seems They promote open source code for voting systems - which sounds nicey doesn't it? - but something isn't right here. Reminds me of George Soros' anti-corruption organizations that are entirely corrupt. DIG