(362.26 KB, 1820x1389)
(540.48 KB, 2012x1431)
(213.8 KB, 601x692)
>>/90655/ there is more - this is pt2, there is also pt 1. Doctors for Covid Ethics website: EXCELLENT RESOURCE --Publications page:-- https://doctors4covidethics.org/publications/ Below are article blurbs about Pfizer approval happening in Australia and the UK without anyone actually checking out the data from drug trials: Pfizer Vaccine Authorised, Data Sight Unseen (Part I) 8-6-2021 A Freedom of Information request to the Australian drugs regulator that approved the Pfizer vaccine confirms that they have never seen the study data. https://doctors4covidethics.org/pfizer-vaccine-rubber-stamped-data-sight-unseen/ Regulation or Racket? UK Drug Regulator Never Inspected the Pfizer Vaccine Study Data (Part 2) 8-9-2021 Freedom of Information requests reveal that the UK medical regulator, like its Australian counterpart, never inspected the Pfizer vaccine study data, and a government advisory committee was misled. https://doctors4covidethics.org/regulation-or-racket-uk-drug-regulator-never-inspected-the-pfizer-vaccine-study-data/ https://twitter.com/Drs4CovidEthics/status/1436636869803003907 BOTTOM LINE: Looks like neither Australia nor the UK ever inspected the study data at all - simply accepted Pfizer's claims about the "vaccines" at face value. They also tried to delay handing over the Freedom of Information data - see articles for more. QUESTION: Did anyone in the USA (from the FDA or any other agency) critically look at the data? If so, were they objective or just part of the "usual suspects"? [CAP is publications list from website plus the two articles]