(1.1 MB, 1080x2698)
(321.72 KB, 1080x1188)
>>/113435/ Barnett's case against Hobbs et al is not over. Barnett filed a last minute Emergency Motion to Set Aside Dismissal Due to FRAUD on the Court. Filed 3:43 p.m. MST 12.4.22 Counsel Gaona’s failure to inform the Court, and the Plaintiff, of the argument made on behalf of Defendants in the Fontes case exhibits a reckless disregard for truth, law, and precedent in this matter. Plaintiff sees no reason, or evidence to suggest any otherexplanation. Counsel Gaona argued directly opposite a legal truth he himself used to protect the same defendants in the present matter, which helped end Plaintiff’s case,despite Plaintiff’s proper reliance upon A.R.S. 16-650 to establish that the legislatureforesaw potential controversies, where it would be prudent to allow the courts to enjointhe Secretary from awarding Certificates of Election. The statute is unambiguous on that point. But also, as Counsel Gaona argued to victory in the Fontes case, the legislature intended A.R.S. 16-650 to enjoin every act in that section as to the Secretary of State’s duty tocanvass the election, declare winners, and award Certificates of Election. There is notemporal gap of substance between the Secretary’s canvass, declaration of winners, orawarding of Certificates, as the current Election Procedures Manual — which has forceof law in Arizona — mandates that all three actions happen on December 5th. And since the Secretary would be responsible for awarding herself the Certificate of Election,immediately after declaring herself the winner, there is no possible way any litigant couldavail themselves of 16-650 enjoinment authority, when there is no temporal gap availableto do so. A construction such as that would render the statute absurd. https://www.scribd.com/document/612259463/Barnett-v-Hobbs-Et-Al-MOTION-REVERSE-DISMISSAL-FOR-FRAUD-MOTION-FOR-TRO-STAY https://truthsocial.com/@barnettforaz