Actions
(16.59 KB, 763x148)
(107.99 KB, 1073x698)
(45.4 KB, 773x263)
(50.89 KB, 1191x413)
(10.59 KB, 421x99)
>>/11417/ >>/108856/ CDC data from millions of vaccinations show that the inflammation, when it occurs, goes away within a matter of days without any serious consequences. And infectious disease experts and pediatricians widely agree that the risks of COVID—including a full-body inflammatory syndrome called MIS-C—are much more substantial. --[Disgusting. In their slide show, they say there's NO LONG TERM data on effects; and provide ZERO documentation on the incidence of MIS-C in children. PURE FEAR PRON]-- Sarah Long, a pediatric infectious disease expert at Drexel University College of Medicine, and a member of the CDC’s vaccine advisory panel, that the post-vaccine heart inflammation might be different from the myocarditis that’s seen during an infection with COVID-19 or from some other cause. It’s so different, and less severe, than typical myocarditis, she says, that giving it the same name has created unnecessary worry over the condition. --[Yuck. Except for one Israeli study, the ones cited in the slideshow are TINY. And have no long-term data. SO WHAT MAKES SARAH THINK THAT THIS "NEW" MYOCARDITIS IS SO DIFFERENT FROM THE "OLD" ONES - none of which are trivia?] Myocarditis isn’t a disease in its own right, like the flu—it’s more like pneumonia, which can be caused by viruses or bacteria. --[Just because a condition has more than one cause doesn't mean it's not a 'real' disease....] BLOW BY BLOW OVER, here's the rest: Next few paragraphs are about why it's ok to minimize the seriousness of myocarditis related to the jabs - all pure conjecture. Followed by some more fear pron on MIS-C - although they cite a study about a kind of myocarditis they claim is related to MIS-C. The only study cited is actually on myocarditis among the jabbed: "Myocarditis With COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines" https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.056135]. The only study on MIS-C in the first study is this one: "Characteristics and Outcomes of US Children and Adolescents With Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) Compared With Severe Acute COVID-19" It's not about children with MIS-C from Covid, either. It just compaires characteristics/outcomes of children with MIS-C versus severe acute covid, all supposedly between 6-12 years old. OK: How many children REALLY had severe covid in that age range? ANY AT ALL? If there were a few, how many got treatments that would have prevented "severe" symptoms from developing?] THIS ARTICLE PROVIDES ZERO SAUCE for the idea that there's a bunch of children who got MIS-C from Covid-19. Only thing that passes for "sauce" is some MD from Johns-Hopkins saying that "most children with MIS-C will have antibodies to the SARS-CoV-2 virus." https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/coronavirus/misc-and-covid19-rare-inflammatory-syndrome-in-kids-and-teens NO SAUCE FOR THAT, EITHER INEVITABLY, we return to the tired old theme of children as superspreaders, as idea discredit more than a year ago: "Children are not COVID-19 super spreaders: time to go back to school" https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32371442/ July 2020 - look at the date!! 17 months ago! If anyone is a superspreader, It's the VAXXED==: Fully Vaccinated Healthcare Workers Carry 251 Times Viral Load, Pose Threat to Unvaccinated Patients, Co-Workers''' https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/vaccinated-healthcare-workers-threat-unvaccinated-patients-co-workers/