(155.54 KB, 639x833)
(157.05 KB, 638x842)
>>/115302/ Text in this post is copypasta https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2017-08-30%20CEG%20+%20LG%20to%20FBI%20(Comey%20Statement).pdf Page 3 As of early May 2016, the FBI had not yet interviewed Secretary Clinton. Moreover, it had yet to finish interviewing sixteen other key witnesses, including Cheryl Mills, Bryan Pagliano, Heather Samuelson, Justin Cooper, and John Bentel. 4 These individuals had intimate and personal knowledge relating to Secretary Clinton's non-government server, including helping her build and administer the device. Yet, it appears that the following key FBI interviews had not yet occurred when Mr. Corney began drafting his exoneration statement: 1. May 3, 2016 - Paul Combetta 2. May 12, 2016- Sean Misko 3. May 17, 2016- Unnamed CIA employee 5 4. May 19, 2016- Unnamed CIA employee 6 5. May 24, 2016 - Heather Samuelson 6. May 26, 2016 - Marcel Lehel (aka Guccifer) 7. May 28, 2016 - Cheryl Mills 8. June 3, 2016- Charlie Wisecarver 9. June 10, 2016 - John Bentel 10. June 15, 2016 - Lewis Lukens 11. June 21, 2016 - Justin Cooper 12. June 21, 2016- Unnamed State Dept. Employee 7 13. June 21, 2016 - Bryan Pagliano 14. June 21, 2016 - Purcell Lee 15. June 23, 2016-Monica Hanley 16. June 29, 2016 - Hannah Richert 17. July 2, 2016 - Hillary Clinton Conclusion first, fact-gathering second-that's no way to run an investigation. The FBI should be held to a higher standard than that, especially in a matter of such great public interest and controversy. Mr. Corney's final statement acknowledged "there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information" but nonetheless cleared Secretary Clinton because he claimed there was no intent or obstruction of justice. Yet, evidence of destruction of emails known to be under subpoena by the House of Representatives, and subject