(109.51 KB, 435x358)
(182.49 KB, 443x413)
(94 KB, 448x226)
(128.55 KB, 467x289)
(77.87 KB, 410x235)
>>/127636/ Peaceful Protesting Is Now "Seditious Conspiracy" In America, Claims DOJ Prosecutors I want to walk through jury instructions on seditious conspiracy to demonstrate the vagueness of the charge and how easy it is to prove. Just look at (2)--this could apply to essentially any political protest on the federal level. [Image 1] So agreeing to a "conspiracy" (I'll get to that laughable definition in a moment) to interfere in the execution of federal law is "seditious" but oh btw it's not necessary for DOJ to prove that the accused knew which law they conspired to break🤔 [Image 2] There are not enough LOLs in the world for this. One prosecutor told Proud Boys jury that a "wink and a nod" constitutes agreement to a conspiracy. Now do you see the low bar to indict Trump? [Image 3] But it says "by force!" Here's DOJs burden of proof. Basically none. Further, what "force" was used when no one brought a weapon, no one assaulted police, and some (Nordean) walked through an open door WITH POLICE RIGHT THERE. Further, Enrique Tarrio was in Baltimore on Jan 6 [Image 4] Consider how this would apply to nearly every protest in Washington, especially climate demonstrations and Kavanaugh confirmation process. This is conspiracy to obstruct Congress. [image 5] Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 @julie_kelly2 https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1654509806105894912.html