>>/145392/
answers
Why is the information re: BO important re: U1 and export approval to Canada to EU?

-It was totally illegal and against US interests/national security -Collusion and intent at the very highest level. Sitting president committed treason.
Where is BO today?

Finding BHO is impossible using standard internet.
Did BO and/or his admin ever make false statements that U1 would never be exported from the US?

Not in the Administration, but Oilprice.com reported the US NRC (Nuclear Regulatory Commission) had not granted Russia licesnces to export uranium from the US (https://oilprice.com/Alternative-Energy/Nuclear-Power/Does-Russia-Really-Own-20-Of-The-US-Uranium-Reserves.html). Apparently Senator John Barrasso (R-WY, where most of U1 is) tried to warn Obama that the Russians did not have or request the correct licenses but that uranium had been shipped to Canada. He said he was ignored. (http://www.nationalreview.com/campaign-spot/417425/barrasso-uranium-has-left-united-states-i-worry-about-iran-getting-uranium-jim)
Who made those statements?

NRC told WY Sen. John Barasso that the uranium would not be exported. After John Christensen saw uranium leaving Uranium One on his property, Donna Wichers (Uranium One spokeswoman) said the uranium was taken to Canada for processing and 75% returned to the US, the rest to Japan & Western Europe. (https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html)
Who did they report to?

Chairman of NRC is appointed by the President and serves at his pleasure. (NUREG-0980 Vol 1 No 10 "Nuclear Regulatory Legislation" Section 23 Footnote 24.) https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1327/ML13274A489.pdf#page=241
Why is this relevant?

President Obama probably had some idea what was going on with Uranium 1
The public has been given a select taste (i.e. sampling) - rest assured others have it all (100% verifiable and impossible to refute). Why is this relevant?

Raise suspicion, prepare them to receive what's coming.

Gives POTUS leverage over bad actors
Who controls the narrative?

-Deep state -CIA
Why are left wing organizations beginning to report on DNC/D corruption?

    Critical mass of civilian-reporting/journalism +Wikileaks info forces them to acknowledge it.
    Protection for some has been removed, so certain information can now be stated without personal threat.

Does the CIA have operators inside the MSM?

Definitely
What happens if exposed?

It will weaken the MSM's message, though not all will believe it
What happens if tied back as 'knowing' to execs?

They'll never control the narrative again
What does this have to do with 'leaking'?