>>/157402/,  >>/157403/,  >>/157404/,  >>/157405/,  >>/157406/,  >>/157407/,  >>/157408/,  >>/157409/,  >>/157410/,  >>/157411/,  >>/157412/,  >>/157413/
Dan Bongino @FBIDDBongino - It’s sad that we have to constantly go through this exercise with media figures obsessed with false narratives.
Sean is correct, as he lays out the fact pattern about the attempted takedown of President Trump.
I STRONGLY caution you against accepting media driven narratives about the collusion hoax, given their roles in promoting the hoax in the first place, and the discovery of new information since the Director and I took over.
Quote
Sean Davis @seanmdav
That's not what it shows at all. The New York Times is straight up lying.
1) The Durham annex never states at all that the specific intelligence was “fabricated.” It says the opposite, that his office was never able to “determine definitively whether the purported Clinton campaign plan [intelligence]…was entirely genuine, partially true, a composite pulled from multiple sources, exaggerated in certain respects, or fabricated in its entirety.”
2) At the time the intel which Ben Smith says was “fake” was received, John Brennan took it so seriously that he briefed Obama about it, took notes about it, and stashed the notes away in his safe.
3) James Comey specifically went under oath and cited the Clinton plan intelligence as one of the major reasons he chose to unilaterally usurp the authority of Loretta Lynch and to declare that the U.S. government would not charge Hillary Clinton for her use of an illegal private email server.
4) Comey told Congress that he believed the Clinton plan intelligence was “genuine.”  “So far as I knew at the time, and still think,” Comey testified on December 7, 2018, “the material itself was genuine[.]”
5) FBI general counsel James Baker said he was “greatly concerned” about the intel and specifically Lynch’s reaction when confronted with it. Durham’s report said Baker “did not dismiss the credibility” of the intel reports. Andrew McCabe likewise said he was struck by Lynch’s “odd” reaction to the allegations.
6) Everyone on earth knows the Clinton campaign launched a scheme to falsely claim that Trump colluded with Russia. This new claim that somehow it was a fabrication that the Clinton campaign ran an op to falsely tie Trump to Russia is beyond insane. It's sociopathic.
Quote
Jonathan Lemire @JonLemire
‘Clinton Plan’ Emails Were Likely Made by Russian Spies, Declassified Report Shows
The release of the annex to a report by the special counsel John H. Durham, right, adds new details to the public’s understanding of a complex trove of 2016 Russian intelligence reports analyzing purported emails that Russian hackers stole from Americans.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/31/us/politics/trump-clinton-emails-russia-investigation.html
FBI Director Kash Patel @FBIDirectorKash - I got one of those too…
Quote
Dan Scavino Jr. @DanScavino
Imagine patriotically and proudly serving in the first Trump White House for four years, and departing in January of 2021 . . . Then, during the four years you're out, BIDEN LAWFARE kicks in, and you receive the below email five weeks before re-entering the White House again in January 2025…
“Google received and responded to a legal process issued by the Federal Bureau of Investigation compelling the release of information related to your Google account. A court order previously prohibited Google from notifying you of the legal process…”
I’ve never shared this—but this is a small taste of the INSANITY that many of us went through—right here in the United States of America. LAWFARE at its finest. A Complete and Total Disgrace!!!!!
https://x.com/FBIDDBongino/status/1951610972105326902

Dan Scavino Jr. @DanScavino - Hey Mook—What did you know, and when did you know it?
 >>/23411910/ pb
https://x.com/DanScavino/status/1951259942070968462

Dan Scavino Jr. @DanScavino - LYIN’ SHIFTY SCHIFF!
https://x.com/DanScavino/status/1951262439237984290
 13