>>/168841/, >>/168842/, >>/168843/, >>/168844/, >>/168845/, >>/168846/, >>/168847/, >>/168848/, >>/168849/, >>/168850/, >>/168851/, >>/168852/, >>/168853/, >>/168854/, >>/168855/, >>/168856/, >>/168857/, >>/168858/, >>/168859/, >>/168860/, >>/168861/, >>/168862/, >>/168863/, >>/168864/, >>/168865/
JULIE DONUTS @Juliesnark1731 - If you’re going in for an MRI with contrast, just know you’re being POISONED.
I received one and I asked how safe the dye was and the nurse said it is a newer and safer contrast and it’s urinated out of the body in 24-48 hrs.
HE ABSOLUTELY LIED. Here’s my blood test after 3 weeks. Off the chart of GADOLINIUM. Heavy metal POISON.
Guess who’s getting a phone call Monday. DO NOT GET ONE WITH CONTRAST. Absolute LIARS. It’s infuriating.
https://x.com/Juliesnark1731/status/1987298762125955123
Julie Kelly @julie_kelly2 - Unnecessary outbursts do nothing to support the serious and consequential allegations in The Blaze article. Sorry to have triggered you, Matt.
Quote
Matthew J. Peterson @docMJP
I’m extremely appreciative of @julie_kelly2’s work. We all are. So were the FBI agents she now hates who actually lost their livelihoods on principle.
But I am very fucking tired of @julie_kelly2 shitting on anyone who does anything else in her space and acting like she owns J6.
https://x.com/julie_kelly2/status/1987636060944298001
Julie Kelly @julie_kelly2 - This sort of bad faith accusation by Baker is another reason why his story should be met with deep skepticism.
First, he suggests that intel sources of any other reporters are being told what to say and claims they haven’t seen the evidence he collected—even though he has no proof to back up that accusation. This is because he knows there is major pushback at various agencies about his report—which is one reason why he delayed publication.
Second, plenty of us have long suspected the involvement of law enforcement or other government actors in the pipe bomb stunt. And just because he left so many holes in his story and offered highly dubious evidence to definitively identify a federal employee as the suspect does not require every J6 reporter/commentator to swallow his claims without question. To the contrary, it is IMPERATIVE that we raise doubt to make sure the right individual(s) are caught.
Third, there is a very obvious anti-FBI angle to all of this. It is most clearly demonstrated by the involvement of Seraphin, who is as dirty and deceitful as they come. As soon as the article posted—which in no way came close to matching the hype of the previous days—Seraphin and others including anti-Trump lawmakers exaggerated the “findings” of the report and demanded to know how Baker “solved” the pipe bomb mystery and why the named individual has not been arrested.
Baker, in order to defend his shoddy reporting, is arguing that ANY doubt about the “evidence” in his article represents participation in an alleged massive coverup at the highest levels of government—which is how he and Glenn Beck teased the article. This is not how a journalist confident in his own reporting on such a consequential matter conducts himself. This is Baker immediately deflecting any criticism rather than account for the glaring holes in his report.
https://x.com/julie_kelly2/status/1987579853391233073
Julie Kelly @julie_kelly2 - I will put my pipe bomb reporting us against anyone. This is not about credit or competition, it's about getting to the truth.
Here is one of my first reports on the pipe bomb mystery, which disclosed law enforcement ties of the woman who "found" the RNC device right before the joint session of Congress convened on Jan 6.
https://amgreatness.com/2021/11/04/ten-months-later/
https://x.com/julie_kelly2/status/1987587080415776991
26