>>/186689/,  >>/186690/,  >>/186691/,  >>/186692/,  >>/186693/,  >>/186694/,  >>/186695/
DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - They know. They're angry because of what this means: that antifa is real and institutional. The whole reason they get away with what they're doing is because they have spent decades setting up a structure with plausible deniability built-in, and it's all unraveling.
Quote:
Shipwreckedcrew @shipwreckedcrew
Among the most stupid posts ever here on X.
He was convicted of conspiracy and obstruction.
Hiding the material to prevent it from being found by law enforcement is an obstructive act punishable by up to 20 years in prison.
The FACTS of the case -- "relevant conduct" as to all who were convicted -- involved an ambush and shooting at an ICE facility.
One of the law enforcement officers was shot in the neck and seriously wounded.
EVERYONE involved in the conspiracy has that aggravating fact applied by the Judge when he determined their sentences -- from 30 to 100 years.
Quote
Krystal Ball @krystalball
I read this 5 times to make sure I was properly comprehending that he is actually facing 30 years for having leftist reading materials.  Beyond insane
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2070188141617778752

DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - Parties feed the NGOs not the other way around.
Quote:
DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican
Article: How USAID Built Color Revolution Infrastructure With NGOs
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2070193653616922822

DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - Change my mind on what? RT'd him, btw!
Quote:
Sam E. Antar @SamAntar
NEW INVESTIGATION: Did Soros Foundation Money Travel Through Charities Into the 2024 Presidential Race?
Full investigation with receipts
https://whitecollarfraud.com/2026/06/25/the-soros-tides-arabella-pipeline-how-charitable-dollars-reached-a-federal-super-pac/
Money you can deduct on your taxes is supposed to fund charity, not campaigns. Here's a trail that runs from a tax-deductible donation to a presidential super PAC — entirely on public IRS returns.
The rule it tests is simple. A 501(c)(3) charity takes deductible dollars but can't spend on politics. A 501(c)(4) can spend on politics but offers no deduction. So when charitable money passes from a (c)(3), through intermediary charities, into a (c)(4) that spends it on campaigns, a tax-deductible dollar has been turned into political spending. That is the line §4955 of the tax code exists to police — and the intermediaries here are two charitable networks, Arabella and Tides.
Here's where the returns say the money went. Two George Soros private foundations sent $92,465,850 to the Arabella charities — New Venture, Hopewell, and Windward. Those same charities moved $343,967,196 to the Sixteen Thirty Fund, a 501(c)(4) political arm.
On a separate path, a Soros foundation routed money through the Tides Foundation, which sent $842,000 directly across the charitable-to-political line into that same fund.
Two further routes added more: Open Society Policy Center, a Soros-affiliated 501(c)(4), gave $68,150,000 directly, and Tides Advocacy, another Soros-linked political fund, added $4,169,700. In all, $417,128,896 reached the Sixteen Thirty Fund.
Now the last step. The Sixteen Thirty Fund and an affiliated political fund sent $13,739,642 to a federal super PAC — about 59% of its itemized receipts. The PAC spent $19,799,415 naming federal candidates, including $12,718,076 supporting the 2024 Democratic presidential nominee.
That closes the chain: charity → charity → political fund → super PAC → the presidential race. A tax-deductible foundation dollar at the top. Federal campaign spending at the bottom. Every rung on a public return.
Every step is permissible in isolation. A foundation may grant to a charity; a charity may grant to a 501(c)(4); a 501(c)(4) may spend on politics. But assembled from the returns, the sequence shows tax-deductible foundation dollars moving step by step toward candidate-directed federal spending.
 8