emma-myers_09... jpg
(96.66 KB, 811x1080)

emma-myers_09... jpg
(72.35 KB, 813x1080)

emma-myers_0906 jpg
(67.59 KB, 814x1080)

emma-myers_0903 jpg
(81.24 KB, 816x1080)

Morning.

 >>/67561/
Digital IDs thing is nuanced. Integration is the "red flag", if you look other EU countries, they have centralized the identification "provider" with a single government agency.
So gov having your biometric data and sharing it for ID with other agencies and private companies is fine, but the government being the centralized "identifier" itself is bad, because they get the power to block you from all private/public services and products.
Biometry is also very vulnerable to future hacking tech, its not technologically viable to have real ID tech, only crypto based digital identities are viable (thankfully).

Physical currency is good, but not when its backed by the fiat banking system built on old technology. It's "well meaning" to try to stick to it, but not effective.

Access to uncensored internet will be more on the basis of being able to use the US future stablecoins or other currency to pay for services like Starlink.

Like I said, its a bit early in the game to really tell because its a very complex technical subject and the cards are not on the table yet. So most well meaning politicians are just not informed enough to give clear answers.