thumbnail of carolinlauffenburger_2016-04-07_18-44-17_12599410_1212405568784746_907367896_n.jpg
thumbnail of carolinlauffenburger_2016-04-07_18-44-17_12599410_1212405568784746_907367896_n.jpg
carolinlauffenburger_... jpg
(104.11 KB, 1080x715)
 >>/68952/
I know Cam isn't a timewaster, so I will give a real response instead of just calling Singer a jew and moving on. Why watch a 30 minute video when you can look at Singer's face and the angle of his forehead for .3 seconds and just know. 

> You're le bad because I don't give all your excess money to some organization that says they save le children? 
> It's the same as seeing a drowning child and not saving it because you don't want to dirty your clothes. 
These are the kinds of tricks that goyim fall for. Based negros generally don't fall for this stuff because they don't have the imagination, or just don't care. White goys, on the other hand, hear about le children starving in le africa or some shit and they can conjure an image of it in their mind, or remember some propaganda images they saw on tv, and it emotionally affects them. They don't want to be LE BAD so they give their money. The drowning child analogy, like Doc posted about, is just emotional manipulation. Jews playing word games, asking goys questions and demanding that they answer and allow that answer to define and guide everything they do in the future. 

 >>/68955/
True. That is part of the deception in that drowning child analogy. Giving money to a global charity helps children (theoretically) that are foreign to the donator; the "save a drowning child" theoretical implies that you or I would be saving a child that lives near to where we live. He says that shit and maybe we imagine the pond or fountain that we often walk by or visit, it makes the argument (or manipulation) hit much closer to home emotionally.