Actions
(99.45 KB, 300x325)
How to carry the burden of internalized Scientific Blackpill? I'm looking for neat counterarguments questioning the key conclusions from such compilations: 1) https://www.reddit.com/r/BlackPillScience/comments/a80wce/ 2) https://www.reddit.com/r/BlackPillScience/comments/a7065g 3) https://www.reddit.com/r/BlackPillScience/comments/a7hatg/ 4) https://www.reddit.com/r/BlackPillScience/comments/am4dod/ 5) https://www.reddit.com/r/BlackPillScience/comments/a4wko9/ 6) https://www.reddit.com/r/BlackPillScience/comments/aksy8x/ Please focus on arguing how to practically cope with, or debunk the claim that "mate preferences in WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democratic) societies are primarily guided by lookism, tribalism and, for heterosexual women, heightism; that, for some individuals, the relationship between the amount of goal-directed effort expended in order to attract and court preferred mates (either by oft-touted self-help methods or by "one weird trick" courtship techniques) and one's success rate may be so poorly correlated that, for these individuals, such narrowly targeted effort is naive at best". Seriously, how to live happily and achieve the peace of mind if you deeply crave the sort-of-idealistic puppy love from the compatible, involved and caring woman, and the best you can get after years of self-improvement (at least here in Australia) is to be passively accepted and opportunistically loved almost exclusively for what you are (looks and resources) rather than at least partially for who you are? This seems to me like a hardwired need of sensitive men which fundamentally cannot be fulfilled as genders exhibit different love styles, although this natural mismatch seemed largely alleviated when the long-term symmetric monogamy constituted the unwritten norm (at least in the pre-Tinder era, within spaces like student peer groups composed of "wholesome" people with common interests).