>>/1681/
> Could you elaborate on this?
I don't think it can be compared to anything done in the past as far as the method of approaching it goes.
I used a way of reasoning like this:
The body consists of a limited number of molecules. The brain has a limited number of neurons. DNA is a limited set. These all form a kind of "screen" where something can be expressed, like the resolution of a digital visual screen. Your actions possible based on your personality, as expressed on this screen, will also be a limited set. Your surroundings are already set, they are what they are and are also limited because their particles are only so many, the DNA and minds of other people are limited and so on. Who you are can then be defined simply as the expression within this context. Don't worry about who you would have been in the 1500s or who you "really are". That's not the meaning of personality as we understand it. Rather it's the exact information created by your inherited genetics, your environment and the history and inner nature of your soul as it expresses itself in this environment.

By expressing this person in your mind, in full, down to the last particle, you have completed yourself. It creates a complete form on the 2D level. That's all there is to it.

What was done in the past can't have been done in this same manner, as the understanding of the world was very different.