thumbnail of lolibooru 705128 animal_ear_headphones fake_animal_ears momoi_(blue_archive) momoi_(maid)_(blue_archive) official_alternate_costume simple_background white_background.png
thumbnail of lolibooru 705128 animal_ear_headphones fake_animal_ears momoi_(blue_archive) momoi_(maid)_(blue_archive) official_alternate_costume simple_background white_background.png
lolibooru 705128... png
(1.49 MB, 3508x2480)
 >>/6513/
I just looked in Wikipedia, and no, those who wrote it do not know what an adverb is. They are using correct example sentences, but they explain them wrongly, by connecting them to a substantive or adjective instead, just because those are directly before or after the adverb.

"The price here is high".

"Here" is an adverb, but the verb it's connected to is "is", another form of "to be", which is a verb (compare "exist").

So it's explaining that the "existing" is taking place "here". The retards instead connect it to the "price" and call it "an exception" because "price" is a substantive!?

No fucking wonder they can't explain it. Seriously.