>>/8443/
> when white people are alone things are much more calm and peaceful, there a sort of happiness and openness to things.Even just 1 minority creates a weird tension where i think whites feel the need not to be as true to themselves
This may be true (in my experience) for people in small churches who maintain a community, I've experienced that, but they are immune to immigration, they instead support it and tend to work actively with inclusion of refugees into society here as well as sending aid to help people in their home countries. Because I know this works, I also have a reference for why it's wrong to just maintain the view that you can't have immigrants and that they cause problems per definition. My own experience is rather that those problem were caused by locals, and then when immigrants arrive, they get blamed for it because it's an easy target. I don't want to start this kind of argument, but for example, just to mention that: they say immigrants perform such and such many rapes. But rapes existed before immigrants arrived. Rather it's even likely that the innate racism within the police will make it easier to convict immigrants for this crime. In the 90s there was a constant discussion in media about the meaning of consent, (because there was no consent law, it was instead phrased in terms that made it sounds like "allowed to hunt" as if talking about animals). Often there would be someone prosecuted for "raping a 14 year old girl" for example, but then it turned out she hadn't said "no", didn't resist or anything, maybe she was drunk. So then by legal definition it's not "rape" as there was no violence used. That means by this specific case definition it wasn't a crime, so they would have to make a new case of it being "sexual abuse/harassment" and redo it from the beginning to get a conviction. But by reaching a "not guilty" verdict for "rape" the case would be dismissed and likely a new case would not be opened. This was not about immigrants, and the discussion was always in terms of how feminists want to frame men, and how men are rapists. Also worth noting that there was no discussion if this was pedophilia, it wasn't on anyone's mind at the time, because it was commonly understood that pedoes are people (men and women) who rape babies (like 1 -2 year olds).
This media discussion is now completely replaced with a racist view about if immigrants rape or not. Isn't it very convenient to have them here to blame for all rapes? Isn't it strange how the white on white rapes of the 90s are not present anymore in any discussion?
Just as an example.