>>/24591/
> in our first emails he pretended to have code knowledge so yes it was pretty sad
i see but i understand why he pretended. ttg has constantly been under attack ever since we started out on /wsg/. the spamming was relentless. he couldn't let anyone smell weakness
> i called it quits on that which he wasnt happy about. my issue lies in him becoming upset when i no longer wanted part in that. i did wrong here aswell. i am not innocent and should have imminently dismissed the idea rather than playing into it. 
obviously no one's happy about free money stopping, but not your fault, he shouldn't have done it in the first place. this is like the weirdest case of grooming I've ever heard
> this is actually hugely wrong the "chadmin B)' sillies were more accurate
> he actually had another gal giving him monies (made me feel alot more normal about our exchange). and a history of ex-girlfriends.
THAT is a surprise
> I made it myself as a joke some time ago.
okay that's pretty funny actually
> sure did. 
so it's another tokfu? guessing you're not willing to give it up
> funny enough that was his idea
it's crazy how we didn't see this entire thing when the videos dropped. back then i honestly believed it was just some tokfu playing a joke on us, obviously adminny wasn't involved, he would never break r2

 >>/24592/
> they always have access to more data, for what I hope are obvious reasons
yes but the expectation is that the admin is trustworthy to protect this data, only using it when necessary to protect the site
 >>/24594/
> You were a part of the moderation team, sturdy admin sharing emails about moderation issues with the moderation team is not "doxxing"
I agree somewhat but it never sat right with me that admin disabled the POSTS OF THE SAME IP WERE VIEWED message and the mails aren't necessarily intended for the mods to see, it's admins mail for a reason