a random agatha2 banner

/agatha2/ - E-Girl Purgatory

e-girl gossip & drama


New Reply on thread #30982
X
Max 20 files0 B total
[New Reply]

[Index] [Catalog] [Banners] [Logs]
Posting mode: Reply [Return]

No. 30982 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions
thumbnail of ken.png
thumbnail of ken.png
ken png
(4.6 MB, 1958x1380) 
https://www.flickr.com/photos/194172735@N06/
https://www.fragrantica.com/member/1299311
https://lovesickloveletters.blogspot.com/ (inactive)
https://rateyourmusic.com/~lovesick (inactive)
No. 30995 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/30977/
Well, because men and women can't be friends, for one thing.
When a woman and a man interact together for a while, either they'll start dating or they'll stop hanging out. Seen it many times.
No. 31026 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31016/
female friends are kind of pointless unless you want to fuck them, want to fuck girls in their extended network or you're just lonely and desperate for company. I guess they're nice to talk to and sometimes a female perspective is relevant but no need to hang out unless it's an avenue to a girl you're actually interested in
No. 31027 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31026/
You are 100% correct. It's very true that the female perspective can sometimes be helpful (ex. they can think of a solution that a man might easily overlook), but generally they're not pleasant to be around, dealing with them is effectively babysitting, and they're outright bad at being friends.
No. 31029 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31026/
My female friends share interests with me and I enjoy talking about those and my life with them. Why does this not compute for you? I’m only friends with people I respect and some of them happen to be women.
No. 31031 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31029/
I respect and love plenty of women I know, and I have women that are friends but they can be kind of annoying in that unique woman kind of way. I find that just get more naggy and want to dump all their random thoughts and problems on you instead of just chill out.
No. 31035 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31031/
> they can be kind of annoying in that unique woman kind of way. I find that just get more naggy and want to dump all their random thoughts and problems on you instead of just chill out.
Beautifully put. And to add to this, if a man acted this way, you'd instantly stop talking to him. The only reason men tolerate this bullshit from women is because humans are programmed to automatically everything women do.
No. 31037 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31036/
see, you're just exposing your own completely warped view on human relationships here. normal people (the well-adjusted, non-psychopathic kind) don't slot their friends into taxonomic categories or choose them based on short-/long-term benefits, they hang out with the people they click and connect with
No. 31038 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31036/
a girl friend is good to drag along if you need to do some kind of shopping that you wouldn't bother a guy friend with. Girls usually love that shit and depending on the purpose of the trip their opinion might be more valuable like fashion, or picking out certain gifts for example. Of course you could also just do these things alone if you'd prefer.
 >>/31034/
that's just how most women socialize which works fine amongst themselves but it's why being around them for prolonged periods can be a drain which is the opposite of what I want when hanging out with someone
No. 31039 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31037/
See, I knew you would deflect instead of actually giving an answer. If you're just gonna use social shaming lines and not contribute, it's better to just be quiet.
No. 31042 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31038/
> Girls usually love that shit
I just wanna point out how your immediate first thought is what the WOMAN would like. It's not about what she's contributing for your sake, it's an activity that she would like. 
> their opinion might be more valuable like fashion, or picking out certain gifts
The gifts thing is a fair point, I'll give you that. Not sure about the fashion part though, considering how women dress themselves, and how they invariably give effectively sabotigical advice to men.
No. 31048 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31042/
It's not about what the woman in question wants as much as it is a mutually beneficially situation. You're not doing the thing to please her but she will enjoy partaking, you both enjoy the company and you might get some helpful input. Girls can be a good addition to a group setting too, other times they could ruin it. All depends.
No. 31065 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31035/
> if a man acted this way, you'd instantly stop talking to him.
Sounds to me like you're just a real piece of shit and not a good friend at all.
I've offered to talk to my male friends too whenever they have issues. Whether that is their grandma dying or something else.
No. 31075 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31065/
You're misunderstanding, I'll give you an example: I'm talking about shit like you go out to eat with a woman, and it's just straight 30+ minutes of her talking AT you, in a pure monologue. She'll get mad at you if you try to interject or have a conversation, and she'll get mad if you show ANY signs of displeasure.
That's not being a friend and listening, that's bludgeoning someone and then being offended when they resist. Not to mention how she does not give a fuck about listening to YOUR problems. It's all about her. Complete emotional tampon.
Now, if a man did that to you, you'd be extremely annoyed, and likely to not interact with that man again. But for women it's expected and tolerated. Purely due to biological programming and naive men not wanting to lose access to that woman.
Two pieces of advice, fellas: 1. If you wouldn't do it for a man, don't do it for a woman. And 2. If a woman wouldn't do it for you, don't do it for her.
No. 31087 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31075/
> But for women it's expected and tolerated.
Not really.
If somebody can't strike a balance betwen being open and being oppressive, then that's not a good relationship to have.
Men tend to close up faster, which is also an issue and I try to get my male friends to open up if I feel they are unsure about it.
I've also had to do the same thing with female friends, though less so. They are often less emotionally stunted and reclusive than men are.

I have never encountered anything like what you described with any of my male or female friends. Sounds more like you're either making shit up or got in contact with some real idiots. In which case, why stick around? There are plenty of entitled people, as you can easily see by police body cam footage for example.

> If you wouldn't do it for a man, don't do it for a woman.
This goes both ways of course, the only exception to a degree is if it's your partner.
No. 31092 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31087/
> then that's not a good relationship to have
Correct. And women overwhelmingly fail at keeping a balance, mainly because they have no consequences for being unbalanced. Hence my point of women being bad friends
> Men tend to close up faster
Because they suffer consequences when they do open up. Mainly to women.
> I have never encountered anything like what you described
Crazy how NOBODY ever sees women being shitty. What an odd coincidence.
> you're either making shit up or got in contact with some real idiots
Men always at fault. Of course.
> why stick around
Probably because it's difficult for men to get women, and the man is desperate at that point and doesn't to lose a lead, even if it's a shitty one.
> This goes both ways of course
Notice how people HATE when you criticize only women. They always say this "it goes both ways" shit. They can only stomach it when both men and women are criticized at once. Never just the women.
No. 31099 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31097/
Give it time, anon. Her return is inevitable. When she needs some attention, she'll post new pictures on Flickr and egosurf here, as she's been doing for the past few years.
No. 31110 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31109/
Kenbros I think that she's showing herself less because she's getting ugly due to veganism, ageing, smocking,etc... but mainly veganism.
No. 31114 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31112/
She hasn’t eaten meat since she was like 15? And went full vegan when she was 17. But who knows if she’s still vegan or just vegetarian.
No. 31137 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
I have a lesbian crush on her. i want to take her out on cute dates in sf to Victorian tea cafes, vintage shops, museums, bookstores, antique stores, and go to indie perfume shops to sniff perfumes together. i want to treat her like a princess and read critical theory books with her. i want to dress up with her and go on beautiful picnics. i want to bake vegan treats with her. I love ken and everything about her. I admire so much of who she is, her interests, and the way she carries herself. she has had a huge influence on who I am even though she does not know of my existence. I have so many dreams about her
No. 31142 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31139/
they are autistic teenage girls, zero utility in trying to understand their behavior. even reading that first sentence of her 3 paragraph post makes me cringe
No. 31143 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31139/
No that’s different. Those women want to copy her because she represents what is ideal to a specific type of male gaze (pure, petite, long hair, minimal makeup, childlike, smart and invested in a lot of male-coded interests like philosophy and obscure music but not smart/savvy in a way that threatens the male ego). I don’t want to be her, I am genuinely in love with her. She is the closest to god that a human being can get, next to Simone Weil and Hegel. She is basically a highly sophisticated philosopher if they were born in 1999.
No. 31153 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
> professes to be a leftist commie
> send nudes to a multimillionaire
Why is she such a disgusting and hypocritical whore?
No. 31154 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31153/
stop trying to rile up the essayposter with shit bait. she never sent him nudes and it’s confirmed she freaked out when he even tried to kiss her the one time they met. this has been beaten to damn death and it’s all from 4 years ago
No. 31159 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31156/
 >>/31157/
Hard to get riled up when I kinda agree with him. People should always be honest even if it shows their flaws. But FYI I'm enjoying some nice chocolate cake I made.
No. 31166 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31151/
wasn’t she posting on Reddit obsessing and worrying if she was a lesbian or not? I could definitely turn her gay. i would treat her way better than her boyfriend and I would wear Victorian suits while she wears gunne sax dresses and we can both read poetry to each other on a windy winter night. I would buy her everything she ever wanted and live to help fulfill her dream life
No. 31167 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31166/
she was also obsessing over whether she was a pedophile or not. reckon you could turn her into that too? 
she only dated boys since then, give it up tranny
No. 31168 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31166/
> I would buy her everything she ever wanted and live to help fulfill her dream life
How? Assuming that you are a biofemale and not a man in a wig, chances are that you are a NEET and a leech exactly as Ken.
Kennedi wants a dominant daddy with lots of money, like the Russian dude, to sustain her expensive lifestyle as a leech.
You have to give up on your dreams, sorry sis.
No. 31184 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31166/
> i would treat her way better than her boyfriend
I don't think Ken runs from idiot guy to idiot guy as fast as most other girls like Marky does.
Of course it could just be that we don't get that info. And I realize the irony when  >>/31182/ was just posted, but I have no clue who that is.

That being said, are you Polish?
No. 31185 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31182/
Once again, you are retarded if you think she’s dating this guy who is clearly just her friend. No need to start obsessing over every person she hangs out with.
No. 31190 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31187/
Yeah, he’s someone she follows on letterboxd and he has his rateyourmusic linked on his profile which is where that picture came from. 

 >>/31188/
No, faceblind. That guy is like 30 too, her friend is 21. Which is reason enough to know they’re not dating or fucking. She just has some genuinely weird friends.
No. 31191 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31190/
 >>/31182/
Obviously not dating. I googled his name and his Youtube channel came up. There’s a video filmed by her (you can hear her voice at one point behind the camera) of him and her other friend that’s also been posted, talking about God in some small room on the floor. There’s no tension or anything and the conversation is fucking retarded enough to make it obvious none of these people are having sex with Ken. 

https://youtube.com/watch?v=keqCKpu3FWE
No. 31198 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
you guys are fucking insane let’s keep digging for more. the guy in that video is  Parish and I didn’t know he would sound so retarded like an average frat bro. I thought these marxist philosophy deleuze  tards would at least sound more sophisticated
No. 31201 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31200/
> Yakub

> In the beliefs of the Nation of Islam (NOI), Yakub (sometimes spelled Yacub or Yaqub) was a black scientist who lived 6,600 years ago and began the creation of the white race. He is said to have done this through a form of selective breeding which is referred to as "grafting", while he was living on the island of Patmos. The Nation of Islam's mythology states that Yakub is the biblical Jacob.

> The story has caused disputes within the NOI during its history. Under its current leader Louis Farrakhan, the NOI continues to assert that the story of Yakub is true, claiming that modern science is consistent with it. Despite the NOI's self-proclamations of consistency with modern science, there are no reputable scientific studies that support this assertion.

Enough internet for the day, good night.
No. 31210 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31204/
> They were 39 before and I saved all of them.
Why the fuck did you save all 39 videos? Like, you actually downloaded them? Anyway it's likely that someone tipped him off that his accounts were being posted here the other day.

 >>/31207/
Why do you think anyone cares what the name of his literallywho brother is?
No. 31212 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions
thumbnail of 1444315015127.jpg
thumbnail of 1444315015127.jpg
1444315015127 jpg
(11.49 KB, 250x241) 
 >>/31210/
> Like, you actually downloaded them?
Yes.
> Why the fuck did you save all 39 videos? 
Because I expected they would disappear.
> Anyway it's likely that someone tipped him off that his accounts were being posted here the other day
Suuure, Jae. Now kennedi knows that you are a creep who stalks her kek
No. 31214 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31212/
I almost respect this level of delusion. It’s like magical realism. You really want to believe someone she’s irl friends with is just another orbiter like you. For what? To think maybe we have a chance? We don’t. We are in the mud all alone and most of us don’t have any real or unique hobbies or interests which is what Ken’s friendships form over. I don’t want to say it’s over but you’re coping more than you should be.
No. 31217 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31216/
What is there to damage control? I’m literally the anon who posted the youtube account in the first place retard. Her and her friends are all fucking autists and I think the video is a good reminder of that. You’re not a detective.
No. 31218 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31217/
If you are not him, you are his friend, which is why you are damage controlling.
If you look closely Jae's letterboxd, he watches the same shorts as Ken but after her her, like the day later. It really makes you think...
No. 31219 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31218/
Are you the same guy accusing every other poster of being "damage control anon" in the Marky thread? Why the fuck would I post this guy's youtube account and a video with Ken's voice if I were friends with either of them? I don't know how actively fueling discussion about this guy is damage control when I'm the reason this convo is taking place to begin with, you absolute fucking mong. 

Anyway, Ken and this Jae guy are clearly close friends but I don't get the urge to say every. single. fucking. man that she knows must be her boyfriend.
No. 31227 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31219/
Look, in less than an hour that the link was posted 5 videos were deleted. Jae or someone related to him is watching this thread very attentively and that's a fact.
And the way you get so riled up for someone you don't even know is very suspicious. You can also assert with absolute confidence from a 40-second long video that no one in that room (even the X people behind the cam) is fucking or dating Ken. 
Things don't add up, but I might be wrong.
No. 31232 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31227/
> Jae or someone related to him is watching this thread very attentively
Isn't it common knowledge already that some of her friends keep an eye out on her behalf?
No. 31233 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
https://venuswithalongneck.neocities.org/mnemonic-delight/dreams

she has updated her dream journal quite a bit and writes a lot about Jae.
No. 31234 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
Jae just posted a new video (a  random game clip he had on his harddisk) to pretend that he knows nothing about all of this. The last time he posted a video on youtube was 3 weeks ago. 
It's too late Jae. Now kennedi knows that you stalk her kek.
No. 31240 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31233/
it’s so strange to me how beautiful and sophisticated she writes about Jae in her dreams but in the video all you see is this annoying ugly moid who looks like a Neanderthal and talks like a high schooler. ken is truly autistic with garbage taste in men.
No. 31253 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31251/
Sounds like he's being ironic. Does he think systemic racism is a joke? What a fucking chud. This is the kind of guy Kennedi hangs out with?
No. 31255 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31251/
Lmao so a guy was complaining about the word faggot being used in a documentary from the 60s and tried blaming the director for it? Letterboxd fucking sucks. Irony is the only way to handle bullshit like that from handwringing libtards.
No. 31265 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31262/
ye but she’s living in San Francisco and we have that video of her giggling and filming three of her friends joking around in a closet.
No. 31266 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31263/
essayposter would you fuck ken? would you be mean? would you call her a bitch? or are you full MGTOW volcel and wouldn’t even hatefuck a cute girl
No. 31267 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31264/
Women are blessed with humans being biologically preprogrammed to blindly defend and support women in anything they do. Make no mistake, it's not a reflection of women's ability in any way.
No. 31269 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31266/
Respectfully, she's not my cup of tea. I wouldn't be rude, but I'd probably call her out if she starts saying or doing stupid shit. And I'm not into hatefucking either.
I'm moreso into mature, calm, mentally stable, upstanding women. (Daresay intelligent ones, if such women exist.) I like the type of woman you can just relax around and have a good time with, in peace.
No. 31275 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31259/
The "depressed Ken without driends" never existed in the first place and those pictures and short videos are just a facade. She still spends most of her time online.
No. 31276 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31275/
Your entire post is contradicting itself. How the fuck is spending time with friends and moving to a big city "just a facade?" What would she even be doing online all day every day instead? Your fantasy is dead.
No. 31277 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31276/
> What would she even be doing online all day every day?
What she has been doing even before moving out: listening to music, watching Wes Anderson movies, masturbating to lesbian porn,...
No. 31279 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31240/
how is this your first time noticing her taste in men amounts to autism and looking like an insane artist, she loves nerds with chad genetics (tall, chiseled jaws, thick eyebrows)
No. 31283 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31279/
> she loves nerds with chad genetics
So fucking tired of women using codewords for "chad" just because they want to not sound shallow.
No. 31286 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31284/
I'd say more like "pretentious artist type", but my point is that it's dishonest to use words like "nerd" or "surfer" etc. when they just mean "hot guy".
No. 31288 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31283/
Are you implying nerds can be Chads? The guy in the video is someone I can see Ken finding attractive but he’s weird enough to where his looks wouldn’t be enough for most. Except Ken because she’s drawn to a specific type of intense insanity let’s be honest.
No. 31289 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
Btw fascinating how a new ken pic was posted and everyone’s talking about if this guy is attractive
No. 31292 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31288/
No I'm saying women want chads but they claim to want "nerds" in order to not appear shallow. Have you ever seen a woman get wet for a sysadmin.
IMO, I could be wrong, but my guess is she's just into men who are above her "level" (Hypergamy), and she picked one of those from her social group of artist types.
No. 31306 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31303/
Wow well whadda ya know. A man and woman spending a lot of time together invariably leads to one of them wanting more. Didn't some excessively verbose retard predict exactly this just a few days ago? Hmmmmmmm. Just the fact that she dreams about him MULTIPLE TIMES means she's into him.
Wild guess, she's having dreams about his ex because she's afraid that he'll go back to her.
No. 31307 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31306/
> she's having dreams about his ex because she's afraid that he'll go back to her
More likely that it's some kind of self-insert or she sees herself as a replacement.
No. 31310 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31306/
or maybe her very public journal is just an exercise in creative writing.
anyways, that yakub video was pretty funny on that dudes channel, not sure why he was received with so much animosity in later posts itt.
No. 31311 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31310/
> not sure why he was received with so much animosity in later posts itt.
The answer should be incredibly obvious, jealous it's not them hanging out with her.
No. 31324 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31313/
she hasn’t had an actual confirmed bf since her ex and anything else is guessing

 >>/31310/
"i’m just trying to find ways to avoid having my soul completely decimated and raped from the inside out right now”
No. 31333 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31303/
She's afraid of his ex for some reason, maybe he's got a psycho ex gf? It doesn't read like jealousy at all, the dreams are about his ex literally stalking her. There's no implied sexual tension in  these IMO, only in this one  >>/31298/ can I see it
No. 31365 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31243/
gotta respect ken's commitment to the bit. while other zoomers are repurposing the early 2000s and looking like dysgenic teen movie rejects, she's still stuck, fashion-wise, in first obama admin-era tumblr/etsycore. it's so twee and out of style that it almost bends back and becomes hip again. when 'y2k skater slut' gives way to lookbook retro she'll be ahead of the pack
No. 31366 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31365/
this was what I was thinking too. regular non-platform docs and thigh high socks + skater skirt is laughably out of style now yet she still manages to pull it off
No. 31391 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions
thumbnail of 1687368623761893.jpg
thumbnail of 1687368623761893.jpg
1687368623761893 jpg
(61.96 KB, 583x496) 
 >>/31233/
So these are the dreams that pretty girls have. I'm so envious and at the same time bewildered at how cheerful and worry free her life seems to be, like something out of a mid 2000s sitcom.
I can't even fathom how someone can have such nice dreams every night. My life is a never ending nightmare.
No. 31392 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31391/
I wouldn't be envious. Her dream journal is equivalent to smelling your own shit and thinking it is not only sweet but something profound.
No. 31403 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31391/
> My life is a never ending nightmare.
That might be the reason why.
Fix your shit.

I have some cute, some bad dreams.
And just so you know, people sometimes make up dreams when they write them in public... or at least add some stuff they didn't actually dream.
No. 31404 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31391/
i personally wouldn't base my (very loose) idea of another person's life on excerpts from their dream journal, but that's just me i guess
No. 31409 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31407/
Imagine Ken writhing underneath him as he shoves his tongue into her mouth, both of them smelling faintly of cigarettes they shared earlier that day with Ariel Pink playing in the background. I doubt this actually happened because Ken is hard to get but imagine. I bet the guys she hangs around are thinking about that at all times and don’t even listen to her speak.
No. 31410 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31391/
her dream journal reeks of severe ptsd. she has dreams all the time about about her cousin dying and her ex (clearly the redacted figure in the journals) trying to kill her. im betting she omits many more dreams too. are you guys forgetting she had an insane upbringing with a bf who brought a gun to her front door and spent her childhood as a shutin plagued by mental illness with an abusive deadbeat dad? that dream journal is anything but sweet most of the time
No. 31418 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31408/
> Your daughter wakes you
Stopped reading there.
If I put out a child, I have done something incredibly wrong in my life and I want to wake up from that nightmare immediately.
No. 31440 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31285/
Word for word, that's a ~75% drop compared to last year's "when people stop wearing a mask, the numbers shoot right back up again".

If this worrying trend continues, 2024's KenCot soundbite will amount to a one-syllable affirmation or a giggle.

We are not exactly, as the kids say, "eatin".
No. 31445 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31425/
She's leading him on. From her journal you can perceive that Jae is attracted to her and SHE KNOWS IT.
She feels a bit guilty about it (jae's ex hunting her), but she still opportunistically enjoys his company, even knowing that jae's feelings are more than platonic and that she will never get with him.
No. 31572 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
How does Ken feel about porn platforms, like OF, Fansly and CB, where no abuse can take place?
No. 31573 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31554/
Thanks, I'll work on that.
 >>/31572/
She probably hated them too, because the issue is personal trauma\insecurities, not the porn or "abuse" itself. Anti-porn people hate hentai too, for example.
No. 31599 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31596/
because there's a series of dedicated stalker threads that appear when you search her name (heads up: you're in one), cataloging nearly all images she has publicly posted online since the age of 15 along with lurid speculation about every facet of not only her life but the lives of her friends, and just now a comment suggesting that at least one person who regularly frequents said threads has access to her private instagram, practically guaranteeing leaks?
No. 31604 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31599/
She doesn't accept people she doesn't know on instagram. Her private profile has like 50 followers and only 1 post, which is curious because it seems like she'd rather put her pictures public on Flickr than share them privately on instagram. Isn't it curious?
No. 31607 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31604/
not really. she could be using it for the sole purpose of keeping up with friends and family. instagram is just another social media platform at this point
No. 31608 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31607/
No rational person in her position would behave like that. She likes being gangstalked. That's the truth. Or she doesn't care. In both cases your seething about our collective stalking is unnecessary.
No. 31609 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31608/
does accurately describing what goes on in these threads scan as "seething" to you? what are you even mad about?

i'll concede that publicly attaching her name to the instagram is pretty stupid, since it just acts as schizo-bait
No. 31617 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31608/
Kennedi LIKES being gangstalked. She literally has an online dream journal because she expects us to read it. Normal people don't read other people's dreams, only stalkers do.
Also the dream journal is a tool to develop the ability of lucid dreaming or to keep track of your dreams. There is ZERO reason to keep it public unless you know that someone will read it and talk about it, feeding your narcissistic and attention-whoring ego.
No. 31624 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31621/
That's irrelevant. If she puts a dream journal online is because she wants other people to read it and discuss about it. There's no other purpose to it. 
She pretends not to care about the gangstalking, but she actually does enjoy it.
No. 31625 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31624/
retarded ass nigga. everybody puts shit online. the DEFAULT is to post. everyone does it. not everyone wants to be gangstalked. idek how that neocities was found bc there’s no name attached to it and it went years without being found. i don’t think she wanted us to see it and ur acting like you got erotomania to assert she did
No. 31626 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31625/
> everybody puts shit online. the DEFAULT is to post. everyone does it.
NTA but doing shit like that is pure attention whoring behavior. It being common doesn't negate that.
Don't even fucking get me started. Your mentality reminds me of when chicks post obvious tit pics online and adamantly claim it's totally not a tit pic.
No. 31628 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31625/
> everybody puts shit online. the DEFAULT is to post. everyone does it.
No, retarded zoomer. That's not what everybody does. You have been indoctrinated to the point that you think it's normal to put your entire life online for everyone to see.
That's NOT normal. That's insanity.
> not everyone wants to be gangstalked.
Ken does.
> i don’t think she wanted us to see it
She knows the we are reading it and she's still updating it.

Normal women don't have online dream journals anyway, because they know that the only people who would read them are stalkers. Your entire post is cope.
No. 31633 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31632/
That's not the essayposter, and "boring" is an NPC-level social shaming term.
 >>/31630/
Essayposter winning without even having to post. Crazy how predictable these retards are.
No. 31648 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31644/
Also Ken hasn’t been a shut in for quite a while at this point. 

 >>/31647/
I thought it was just one. But it makes sense with the whole radical feminism anti sex industry arc she grew into
No. 31677 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31667/
too curvy, too high bf%, hair too short and thin and black, wrong room decor, not verbose and pretentious enough. this is all ignoring the obvious part of ken not being the type to do that especially with an identifying username. didn’t laugh 3/10 effort
No. 31795 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions
thumbnail of screenshot.jpg
thumbnail of screenshot.jpg
screenshot jpg
(609.21 KB, 1920x1080) 
 >>/31792/
Vocaroo link from first thread is 100% dööd, why nobody saved it? What about this  >>/31280/ vid at 00:31? I almost thought it was Marky speaking, holy shit the pitch is almost identical, a bit higher, so uncanny.
> 01:29

Can hardly believe this is her. Basic bitch arrows like she's some eastern euro whore, circa 2015, short(er) hair, whole face obscured by cuckmuzzle (not the cute pink one I've seen pics around).
No. 31796 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31795/
It's her. She's just ugly.

https://www.qcnews.com/news/u-s/north-carolina/mecklenburg-county/businesses-schools-would-have-to-make-decisions-if-and-when-meck-county-lifts-the-mask-mandate/

> “When people stop wearing a mask, the numbers shoot right back up again,” said Kennedi Cotarelo.
No. 31797 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31795/
 >>/31796/
Her hair was pulled back in a ponytail and she was randomly interviewed while going to the store, probably in the morning. You can’t even see her face and you’re still seething.
No. 31816 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31806/
 >>/31802/
Your everyday woman doesnt sound like that, like 1% of women have voices that high pitch naturally. Sounds contrived, which I wouldn't be surprised about.
 >>/31797/
Clearly wasnt in a ponytail if she has hair flowing from  every direction, but she still looks cute in that, not sure why the anons yrt were so mad.
No. 31818 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31816/
not even that high pitched. she sounds like your average artsy airhead girl  especially in the On God video. it’s more mousy than high pitch
No. 31828 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
I'd personally love to hear the rest of her album though. As cool as it is to see new pics, for me it's her original music that'll outlast everything else on this board.
No. 31906 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/31905/
Because she posted a story about “Seeing Kennedi today” and then a few days later posted “seeing Kennedi again today.” Which means they’re not staying together.
No. 32128 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/32127/
That's not real. It's made with an app.
I'm pretty sure that her teeth are rotten or crooked. There are hundreds of pictures of her online and her teeth are not visible in any.
No. 32129 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/32128/
the "ken's crappy mouf" meme that used to be thrown around in these threads has been debunked, me gravy lad
her upper teeth can be seen in the halloween flickr photos and they look perfectly fine. a person with "rotten"-stage dental issues would certainly not pose for and upload such images. they're also visible (to various degrees) in a few instagram pics. her keeping a closed mouth during selfies is an aesthetic choice, however stupid/vain/tryhard it might appear. it's worth keeping in mind that ken obsessively curates her online presence (a vast majority of her pictures are "arranged", i.e. not candids), and probably doesn't want to spoil her glum hipster image with live laugh love
unless someone who has met her irl weighs in, it's safe to assume that ken's chompers are no worse than the average 20-ish drug-free white girl's
No. 32130 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions
thumbnail of s1.jpg
thumbnail of s1.jpg
s1 jpg
(171.75 KB, 964x595)
thumbnail of s2.jpg
thumbnail of s2.jpg
s2 jpg
(91.49 KB, 782x500) 
 >>/32129/
It's impossible to tell from these blurry pictures whether her teeth are crooked or not and notice how there's not a single video of her talking. I don't know what problem her teeth have, but she's obviously self conscious.
No. 32134 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/32130/
there's barely any video of her *at all*. we're talking about less than 30 seconds of available footage in total, plus the concert clip which is virtually bigfoot tier
No. 32160 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/32148/
Using porn in relationships is normal and everyone does it, faggot. Has nothing to do with the woman. Could you make it anymore obvious you’re an insecure foid?
No. 32167 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
I wish Ken would post a high resolution picture, like Marky did, so we could see all her imperfections. I think she's too insecure for that.
No. 32171 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/32166/
Wah wah wah. MOST men use porn whether in relationships or not. If you’re gonna say most men think the women they’re with are ugly just kill yourself now, projecting femcel.
No. 32337 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/32171/
 >>/32160/
Not the anon you're responding to, but that's utter nonsense. /r9k/ and /b/, where you hang out with your fellow porn addicts, do not represent the general population.
No. 32353 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/32346/
jungle is better than trannies
they only like tranny tier core subgenres that always have anime or furry shit as their artist and cover art
No. 32357 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/32171/
> MOST men use porn whether in relationships or not.
Whether thats true or not, doesn't mean its healthy. Meta analyses have shown that male porn consumption while dating are correlated to poor interpersonal outcomes, lower sex drives and higher stress.
There's no real benefit to porn anyways, might as well just put it behind you, unless you enjoy cucking yourself.
No. 32396 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
Imma pop the big one: is Ken lowkey racist?

Since post-civil rights American culture (especially of the youth variety) revolves around blacks, she really has gone quite the lengths to distance herself from it. Her style; her hobbies; her taste in music, film, art and literature; the way she conducts herself, both in writing and appearance (however artificial) – there's not a hint of blackness, not even ironically. Her tumblr, the most accurate gauge of her aesthetic preferences, is completely void of African-American influences. Even her brand of absolute communism carries an undertone of "class reductionism" that minorities like to cry about.

How are race relations in NC? In reference to the BLM riots, she says that "the amount of protests and strikes bring tears of joy to my eyes", but did she march for Saint Floyd herself? Is it all part of a wider anti-Americanism and/or disgust with the world around her?
No. 32407 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/32396/
she also vehemently defends the actions of Ariel pink and John Maus and associates with white nationalists at least back when she had Twitter so I would say yes.
No. 32440 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/32396/
A point worth honing in on: while KC has exhibited a deep and eclectic taste in music, and thrives on showing it off, there is not a trace of the black-pioneered and -dominated forms such as jazz, soul, hip hop and r&b. Anything funk-flavored is taken in bastardized  post-punk form. In fact, she has only ever highlighted a single rap act and that is... Bladee.
No. 32446 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/32396/
She did march in 2020, I remember she posted a couple things about it on twitter. Communists like her tend to see it as not being their place to speak on race
No. 32825 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/32820/
not everyone likes Citizen Kane, only actual movie buffs do, people who can recognize and appreciate innovative and brilliant screenwriting, direction, photography, acting.
a lot of people like Buffalo 66 not because it's good from a cinematic point of view, but because it deals with dysfunctional people in a way that's considered cool. still a good movie, though
No. 32827 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/32825/
You're right, good point. I just got pissed off by that anon trying to dismiss art because he hates being associated with it. The movie is very understanding and empathetic towards lonely men fucked up by society and I think most ITT would like it.
No. 32846 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/32833/
I've seen it a number of times actually, it's one of my favourite films :^3

Look, I haven't actually seen Buffalo '66, and I didn't say it was bad. But it's just a fact that in recent years this film has become immensely popular with a certain type of e-girl, particularly the DDLG-type girls I see post about it all the time, the types of girls who are more interested in things for the "aesthetic" they aim to project than for any genuine interest in film or art. I didn't make any comment about the artistic merit of the film itself, though I do think that, often, the kind of people who are interested in or attracted to a thing may say something about the thing itself. Admittedly, it's put me off from watching it, perhaps not wholly justifiably, though I didn't have any great interest in it in the first place—I recall watching one of Gallo's other films, The Brown Bunny, quite a while ago, around when I had first started to take an interest in film, and, truth be told, I didn't think very highly of it—but if everyone here is so enamoured with it I'll give it a watch if I get a chance.
No. 32847 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/32846/
It's a good movie. Are you essayposter using Gilbert's emotefagging? Can't really tell. But if you watched Buffalo 66 you'd either love it or hate it. I assume you'd like everything but the last act. I know what you mean about the DDLG pinterest tumblr girl types liking it but that's literally because they think Gallo is hot and want to be kidnapped by him in their BDSM fantasies. Based on Ken's other 5 starred movies on letterboxd and what we know about her, it's pretty obvious she doesn't just like it for the reasons those chicks do. I'm sure she'd have some long essaypost herself about it. I do think the other anon might be right about her seeing herself in it though with who her ex is and how that played out. 

The Brown Bunny fucking sucks by the way, don't watch it.
No. 32856 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/32816/
 >>/32818/
I haven't seen it, but from the IMDB synopsis, it just sounds like erotic fiction for women.
> this hot criminal man really wants a woman to call his wife in front of other people (giving her social status), so he kidnaps you (of all other women) and uses force to get you to do what he wants
Let me guess, there's also another hot man, possibly a blond, who suspects something's up, and tries to (in)directly intervene.
No. 32858 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/32847/
That's not the essayposter. My writing style is more direct and far less personal. Plus, recently I've been aiming to condense my points.
And to add, a LOT of why women like media is because they project themselves onto others. That's why they like seeing shows about rich celebrities. Eventually they start thinking they themselves are rich and famous, hence the egos.
No. 32948 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/32858/
The vast majority of people's relationship with media depends on their ability to project themselves onto it. You see it even here with "literally me" memes being the one thing that can convince young disaffected men to watch movies. Look what happened with Drive and Taxi Driver and Her. Same shit different toilet, most people just want something to relate to.
No. 32996 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
I find it really really hard to feel bad for women who repeatedly choose the absolute worst scumbag men to be with over and over. 100+ good\decent men in her area, and she picks the 1-5 who'll cheat\abuse\deadbeat\mistreat her? Come on.
No. 33024 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions
thumbnail of 26750076_196150680940882_3246621184124518400_n.mp4
thumbnail of 26750076_196150680940882_3246621184124518400_n.mp4
26750076_196150680940... mp4
(622.09 KB, 400x224 h264) 
 >>/32845/
I'm hyped up on protein shake, so I'll bite.

If the thread of her on /pol/ didn't broke me, then it was that pic alone.
> vid related, faggot's words are almost word-for-word what I reflexively thought

Still cannot look at her pics directly, but I feel so much better after surmounting those knee-jerk sensibilities :^3
No. 33065 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions
thumbnail of IMG_1906.jpeg
thumbnail of IMG_1906.jpeg
IMG_1906 jpeg
(364.33 KB, 1280x720) 
 >>/32816/
I wish there were other film buff egirls because Kennedi isn’t nearly active enough on Letterboxd for me to gauge her opinions and feelings on what she watches. It seems like she just goes with the basic egirl art hoe picks.
No. 33073 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/33065/
since when was her taste basic? she watches some really obscure stuff. can you give us some films recs that aren’t “basic”?
No. 33118 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions
thumbnail of 133b1a61cf3240bd97fb81f6c04b2525997b9dcaed4d9d11b59899e246252b24.jpg
thumbnail of 133b1a61cf3240bd97fb81f6c04b2525997b9dcaed4d9d11b59899e246252b24.jpg
133b1a61cf3240bd97fb8... jpg
(42.86 KB, 750x750) 
 >>/33051/
> Nobody wants to talk to your attention-whoring ass
I took this personally :^3

All I ask is for God to concede the inspiration to articulate the hellfire in my young heart,
Though I am willing to fall into heresy and be possessed by muses for an idolatry and art,
Thou glisten with memories of a cocooned aesthetic which once allured and petrified me like a gorgon,
Even though today that aesthetic flutters away as an elusive desire which pierces my sensible organ,
No please no I cannot endure such torture but I must ask you to maintain your distance from me,
There is nothing I can do to reject my newfound honesty nor temptations and petitions from thee,
If you appear to me as a thin and white specter then my restraint I boldly cannot guarantee,
On a mattress let's both pray separated by megameters so that our distance is vast as a sea, 
No please yes my shameless regret now asks to grab your marred calf and kiss your bruised knee.

>  the first letter of each verse spells out the word "ATTENTION"
No. 33124 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/33118/
This is your best poem so far, the only one I actually liked. Still about Ken? I guess I don't have to ask, it obviously is. Good work.
No. 33136 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/33073/
It's obscure stuff only if your knowledge of cinema is limited to MCU. Most movie buffs have seen or know about most of the movies ken watches, they're literally almost all classics, cult or fashionable movies. Even the more experimental stuff is fairly well known, like Hollis Frampton, whose works are considered milestones of avant-garde cinema.

 >>/33079/
That movie is Winter Light by Ingmar fucking Bergman, who happens to be one of the most celebrated directors of all time.
No. 33140 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/33136/
Well known among film buffs =/= boilerplate ethot taste. Besides that she does like legit obscure films. But why does it matter so much to you how obscure something she likes is?
No. 33150 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/33136/
And to possibly be cynical about it, it's perfectly possible for someone to rate an "obscure" movie highly without even watching it. Or daresay even understanding it.
No. 33156 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/33136/
It's obvious that she watches movies only for LE AESTHETICS. She recently rated Red desert by Michelangelo Antonioni half a star. That's all you need to know about her cinematic understanding.
No. 33192 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/33151/
Cynical. And low IQ people constantly try to show people they're high IQ. Not realizing that genuinely intelligent people don't brag about it. Same for being powerful, attractive, confident, etc.
No. 33227 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/33156/
How absolutely fucking rich to complain about someone only caring about aesthetics just to get butthurt that she doesn't like an Antonioni film, the master of hacks who put all their eggs in the basket of aesthetics. Blow Up and La Notte are alright, but the rest of his filmography is plain bad and just him jerking off. Red Desert is piss boring and people jizz their pants over the aesthetics more than anything else in the film. 
> ohh look, a woman slowly acting more and more crazy who only has like 5 lines the entire film with the rest of it being shots of factories, this is so deep and i totally don't just like this for filmbro cred. If I had to guess, the coerced sex scene at the end of the movie probably made her hate it even more than what I already said about it. I actually liked that scene the most out of every other scene in the damn movie because it shows how alienated she is more than anything else, but I understand hating it especially considering the rest of the movie fails at doing the same thing as much. 

Shite taste, you lot.
No. 33344 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/33311/
> be woman
> film extremely softcore lesbian porn
> use thesaurus to write synopsis
> everyone treats it as a groundbreaking deep intellectual piece
Living life on easy tutorial game journalist aim assist difficulty.
No. 33353 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions
thumbnail of 36568bda498d1a6d1d67456f2eb0396c.jpg
thumbnail of 36568bda498d1a6d1d67456f2eb0396c.jpg
36568bda49... jpg
(150.09 KB, 750x1334) 
Any oldfag here? How were the Ken threads on 8chan? When did they start? Also, I started browsing /agatha2/ on 8chan in 2019, but I didn't care about Kennedi, only cared about Marky back then.
No. 33378 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/33344/
If you needed a thesaurus for anything she wrote in that short text... I have bad news for you. You are mentally retarded.
I guess you could call her pretentious for writing "aesthetical" as "esthetical", even though technically it is allowed.
No. 33400 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/33388/
Production and marketing teams are not the filmmaker. And letterboxd is an aggregator that either lets users write content or takes data from third parties.
No. 33431 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
I wish I could the see the face of every whiteknight that keeps shielding ken with their own body at every turn on this thread.
I would also like to burp in that very face at point blank
No. 33448 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/33347/
She's not a lesbian, a guy in sf is definitely letting her live with him due to some type of relationship. She has no college education, how would she afford rent out there otherwise

Unless she doesn't live there but just travels there often
No. 33525 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/33491/
rent would be 2900 for a 1bdr in San Francisco and then if she lives far enough to take a train, rent for a 1bdr goes down to 2000. Sure you save a lot in comparison, but you need a decent job for either. At nearly 25 she only has a hs diploma, a couple months work experience, then she went on neetbux for a few years afterwards. I highly doubt she'd give up neetbux so quickly anyway, since it's difficult to get approved in the first place

But the other possibility is that she never moved. She could've traveled there in February to stay with friends and then done it again recently.

I'm not even fully convinced that the voice in  >>/31280/ is her. Compared to the other recording of her voice in  >>/31792/

Also if you were being "stalked" wouldn't it be fun or relieving to convince people you moved across the country? By getting someone to spread rumors you're "engaged and moved to SF" then post photos of SF and stop posting anything afterward since? She's had her address leaked repeatedly ever since she was a kid, after things like  >>/16834/ maybe she just wants confusion surrounding her whereabouts now. She definitely lurks since she deleted videos, photos,and captions about those bands and venues after they got listed here
No. 33682 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/33638/
ill-fitted clothing. the seams and the silhouette make her look bad because they hang off her body without hugging her actual frame
No. 33687 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/33638/
Because she's not wearing black stockings and her manly legs show up more. Also her torso is manly. 
No wonder her exbf didn't like her nudes.
No. 33689 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/33687/
manly legs wtf lol? her legs are extremely feminine even in this super unflattering pic. and youre literally making the ‘didnt like her nudes’ part up. are you a foid?
No. 33707 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
Lol notice how whenever women try to insult other women out of jealousy, they always bring up extremely petty and irrelevant shit like minute details about clothes, weight, femininity, and general social shaming.
The insults sound very forced because the hate is coming from the woman's own jealousy, and not from anything that the other woman did. Legit just making up any reason to attack.
No. 33708 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
Also, women are mega retarded for being emotional and jealous, especially when completely unprovoked. They see another woman getting attention and they shit themselves. They cannot handle it. Pathetic.
No. 33744 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/33736/
She's definitely not an 8. Stop being retarded, you're just giving these chicks an inflated ego.
Objectively, she's a 5.5 TOPS. You just have an unhealthy attraction to "weird" women, like every other browser of this board does.
No. 33825 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/33815/
The girl ITT is also another loser who egosurfs here, as proven by the fact that she just deleted her dream diary after being made fun of her looks.
No. 33826 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/33815/
That's correct. Though I find the "Heh, but you do it too." retort to be very low IQ.
Either it's a weak deflection tactic, or you genuinely believe that me being retarded automatically invalidates someone else's retardation. Neither is good.
No. 33828 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/33825/
You're both fucking retarded. She changed the url to match her blog https://lovesickloveletters.neocities.org/mnemonic-delight/dreams 
It took 10 seconds to figure this out.
No. 34394 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/34226/
The most recent pic of her is an unposed candid and it’s the best pic of her to date. She was still a disheveled teen in this one.
No. 34426 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/34109/
Why did she start posting her dreams publicly to the internet during a time she was simultaneously claiming to be stalked. Is she an actual narcissist? Or getting some weird enjoyment out of the situation
No. 34427 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/34426/
It's useless, anon. You can't criticize her. If you point out that she is an attention whore and a hypocrite, kensimps in denial will call you a baiter or a woman.
No. 34454 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/34426/
The neocities went undiscovered for over 3 years so it’s obvious she didn’t think it would be found. They’re just dreams anyway, you’re acting like she’s blogging and posting selfies every day when she’s just updating her dreams a few times a year.
No. 34637 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/34629/
> why jae? he’s average looking
Don't inflate the ego of these narcissists. Ken is also painfully average. They are looksmatched.
No. 34646 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/34641/
Ken is SIGNIFICANTLY more attractive than Jae is, but Jae is the most attractive of any of the men she’s been confirmed to hang out with in person. He’s above average physically but the retarded way of speaking and the way he took that picture makes him seem much less attractive. In the video he’s good looking but talks like a 70 IQ zoomer with irony poisoning, in the pic he looks disabled. I have no idea how to actually rate him.
No. 34654 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/34652/
I don't think she wears much makeup. She looks better in the recent pictures mostly  because she is using her best angles and has a haircut that conceals most of her face, leaving only the eyes, nose and mouth visible.
No. 34773 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/34648/
Her facial structure did change a lot. She uses the same exact angles she always did, and she looks like a different person even in the pics without makeup. Puberty was a godsend for her. She lost most of her face fat, developed more, and looks much healthier and cuter now. I'm pretty sure there had to be some hormonal issue going on or something when she was a teen, because she legitimately looks like a different person post-puberty. 

 >>/34655/
Marky became cute as a teen and now as an adult she's ugly as fuck. Ken was an awkward teen who grew into the beautiful swan as an adult. What matters more, being hot temporarily as a teen or becoming legitimately beautiful? The second, duh.
No. 34783 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/34648/
What you're saying is 12 year olds look the same as 24 year olds, which is beyond retarded and creepy.
But it's typical drivel for you.
No. 34858 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/34853/
I dont agree and I'm guessing you've never been close enough with a woman where you see how they look like when they go to bed and how great makeup can make them look in the morning. That's what the difference looks like in her photos. You'd be surprised what natural looking makeup does
No. 34877 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/34858/
Many of her prettiest pics are completely makeup free and from 2020 and 2021. Like the pic where she’s in a pink sweater looking directly at the camera up close. The bad pics posted above are all EXTREMELY unflattering because of lighting and angles literally anyone would look bad in. Pics like this exist of everyone including Ciara.
No. 34891 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions 
 >>/34889/
I don't think it would look good in OP. Text over the image, too much border space, too vertical, Kennedi not prominent enough. Just my opinion, though.
No. 34892 [Preview] [Reply]
Actions
thumbnail of Ken.jpg
thumbnail of Ken.jpg
Ken jpg
(152.21 KB, 564x1043) 
Previously:  >>/30982/

Letterboxd:
https://letterboxd.com/heartbeat/

Flickr:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/194172735@N06/

Fragrantica:
https://www.fragrantica.com/member/1299311

Dream Journal:
https://lovesickloveletters.neocities.org/mnemonic-delight/dreams

Blogspot:
https://lovesickloveletters.blogspot.com/ (inactive)

RYM:
https://rateyourmusic.com/~lovesick (inactive)

Post(s) action:


Moderation Help
Scope:
Duration: Days

Ban Type:

523 replies | 90 file
New Reply on thread #30982
Max 20 files0 B total
[Index] [Catalog] [Banners] [Logs]