a random agatha2 banner

/agatha2/ - E-Girl Purgatory

e-girl gossip & drama


New Reply on thread #34896
X
Max 20 files0 B total
[New Reply]

[Index] [Catalog] [Banners] [Logs]
Posting mode: Reply [Return]


thumbnail of Ken.jpg
thumbnail of Ken.jpg
Ken jpg
(152.21 KB, 564x1043)
Previously:  >>/30982/

Letterboxd:
https://letterboxd.com/heartbeat/

Flickr:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/194172735@N06/

Fragrantica:
https://www.fragrantica.com/member/1299311

Dream Journal:
https://lovesickloveletters.neocities.org/mnemonic-delight/dreams

Blogspot:
https://lovesickloveletters.blogspot.com/ (inactive)

RYM:
https://rateyourmusic.com/~lovesick (inactive)
 >>/34911/
As a man with daddy issues I take offense to the repeated claims itt that it’s a movie exclusively for tumblr girls. The only people I know who like this movie are men. It’s about how daddy issues affect MEN. Vincent Gallo is LITERALLY ME.
Post the worst picture of this girl, one of the old ones showing her oversized forehead please.
 >>/34921/
12 year olds do not have the same facial structures as 24 year olds. Her forehead is covered with bangs yes but that isn't frauding lmao.
 >>/34922/
She wasn't 12 in those pictures and face shape is literally the same after a certain age.
If you put frontal and lateral bangs plus filters to these pictures, you'd get the same ken we all know.
thumbnail of 1582921096442.jpg
thumbnail of 1582921096442.jpg
1582921096442 jpg
(211.89 KB, 1080x1194)
Found the pink sweater pic but the black cardigan threw me off. 

 >>/34923/
Her face is wildly different. Yes, the forehead remains, obviously, but the forehead is not what I mean when I say face. I'm talking about her cheeks, lips, nose, jaw. You can see many differences emerge over the years, pre-makeup. Pic related is what she still looks like, completely makeup free and a direct angle but looks totally different from how she did 10 years ago. 

 >>/34924/
You wouldn't, though. Her jaw changed from braces and tooth removal, and she lost most of her facial fat. Keep in mind she was 14 ten years ago, and NO ONE looks how they do at 14. Kaya looks like a completely different person, with her whole face structure changing. Her jaw and chin changes, cheekbones changed, eyes changed, nose changed.
 >>/34923/
It's not just her forehead. She also has a big nose, weird nostrils, tiny mouth, thin lips, no equal facial thirds and eyes slightly too distant from each other (visible only on frontal shots that she intentionally avoids).
She's not ugly but average. Most women out there are like her. You simps have to be detached from reality or extremely insecure to consider ken a goddess.

 >>/34925/
Kaya has the same face shape but aged and with a different haircut. Facial proportions are essentially the same.
 >>/34927/
I'm aware she has a weird face, but that's where personal taste comes into play. Attraction isn't maths no matter how much lookism types like you try to make it out to be. It's very personal and never going to be objectively measurable. It's subjective and has many influences. I find far apart eyes and small mouths extremely cute personally, and I think if she parted her bangs as an adult she still wouldn't look bad (to ME) given her facial development. 

 >>/34927/
> Facial proportions are essentially the same.
Highly disagree but too lazy to make a comparison collage in mspaint. Kaya's chin got way bigger and sharper, face overall got larger, she lost literally  ALL of her cheek fat and freckles. Her nose is bonier and longer now, not the same snubby pig nose. Cheekbones got higher and her eyes are smaller because of her skull growth.
thumbnail of kenny.jpg
thumbnail of kenny.jpg
kenny jpg
(96.68 KB, 959x716)
 >>/34918/
Thanks for your swift reply.
Honestly, she has a physiognomy of what you'd expect to see in a generic amerimutt with negroidized white trash name like "Latisha" ("Kennedi" is not far off in trashiness, but still), who listens to Taylor Swift and is pregnant by age of 16. She actually turned out nice aesthetically even if all this is a deception, and in reality she's nothing special, working wagie job at a bakery, at least her communist larp thing is rooted in reality. I like her big bushy eyebrows I guess, they look un-fakeable (unless I'm blind or something).
 >>/34929/
> she has a physiognomy of what you'd expect to see in a generic amerimutt with negroidized white trash name like "Latisha"
As we've told you several times before, you are incredibly mentally ill.
You should listen to yourself talk.
 >>/34929/
Funnily enough she was filling her eyebrows in here, with makeup. She does have thick brows but she’d exaggerate them in this era as a teenager, so it’s clearly a feature of hers that she likes a lot. 

 >>/34930/
She used to post about it.
 >>/34933/
It’s old tumblr girl fashion. Every other girl wore one of those at the time. 

 >>/34936/
She stopped working at the bakery around the time her ex showed up with a gun, you do the math. Her PTSD is obvious from her dream journal.
 >>/34979/
They really don't, lol. We get a couple new pictures of her a year and the only info that ever circulates is all years old and out of date. Most of what's discussed is hypothetical scenarios, old gossip, woman hate, and bullshit political posting.
 >>/34938/
Yeah she got on disability claiming ptsd and autism makes her unable to work. And she lives off like 900 bucks a month from the government + gifts from men
If communism were instituted, who would be working in the sewers? That's what these people can never answer.
 >>/34982/
Has literally anyone ever proven she's on neetbux? I have yet to see this anywhere at all. The most likely scenarios with her living in San Francisco are that she's supported entirely by a boyfriend or she's working since the SF min wage is like $20 and she could have roommates. 

Add "guessing games" to the list of what these threads are. Fun!
 >>/34986/
She also talked to multiple people about getting on neetbux at the time when it happened, when she was more open to messaging random people on social media and twitter.
 >>/34983/
probably neets like you or other similarly uneducated but able bodied people, just like in our current society
 >>/34986/
true but that was years ago, its possible she works now. 
especially after moving to a new city, if this guy >>/34938/ is correct about her motives for being unemployed to begin with
 >>/34928/
> that's where personal taste comes into play. Attraction isn't maths no matter how much lookism types like you try to make it out to be. It's very personal and never going to be objectively measurable
I must point out that only men have those "tastes" for women. It doesn't go both ways, women only really like one type of man.
 >>/34989/
Why would she go through the process of trying to get SSI if she was just going to decide shes "not disabled anymore" and work a couple years later? To get approved you have to have medical documentation that "proves" that you cant work any type of job. People try to hold onto that free money forever. You're even required to show you're in treatment for your conditions to keep it, so maybe that's why she's in therapy now after being so against it. Even if she did work, she's probably one of those people who could only manage part time 20 hours a week, if she's really as disabled as she says she is. And that income wouldn't end up being much better than getting a chunk of cash as neetbux and then having her boyfriend cover some of her other stuff. Think about it. Her options are to work as much as she can and be completely poor in a high cost of living area with no education, or be on neetbux and still be completely poor but bf and friends feel bad for her and buy her shit. She probably just goes to cheap shows all the time that her boyfriend pays for. He probably buys her cigarettes too. And other than that she gets to do whatever she wants all day since she's unemployed. Sounds like a great life for Ken
 >>/34992/
Ken has a few mental issues that factor in who she dates, but even barring that, the worst I've seen her go for is a man with an imperfect/average face. No fat fucks, no manlets, probably no poor men, etc. Speaking of, what's Jae's height? And her previous bfs'?
 >>/34994/
> required to show you're in treatment for your conditions to keep it, so maybe that's why she's in therapy now after being so against it.
so maybe she did what the system intended, and went back to work after becoming healthier?
 >>/34994/
She had a full psychiatric evaluation when she was in high school which is what is required to get SSI. Since she already had that, that’s not why she’s now in therapy. It’s not hard to see how someone against psychiatry could still see the merits in a good therapist.
 >>/35000/
They're not my screenshots, no. People have noticed how individuals who instantly go for these unoriginal social shaming terms are all the "soyboy" type and/or physically unattractive.
 >>/34996/
her abusive ex bf looked like lurch bro. she could obviously get a normal looking brad but she goes for the weirder guys because that’s who she likes.
 >>/35005/
It's possible you're right, though I'd still need to see how the ex looks. I don't believe she exactly likes "weird" men, moreso that her mental issues are affecting her choices. Something like her being so insecure about her looks that she purposefully limits herself to average men, regardless of if she likes them or not. Her being with an abusive man could have been her thinking "He's the type of man I deserve" or something. But of course, that's just speculation.
 >>/35006/
You're welcome. I don't want to bother the kenbros.
 >>/35012/
There's an easy way to test this, just flip the genders. If a woman was financially supporting the man, would she see it as freeloading? Fuck yeah she would. There's your answer.
 >>/35016/
You have to remember that Ken is an odd duck. Forget her looks for a second and remember that she is the most eccentric of all of these girls with the weirdest hobbies and interests. I'm not saying she's super unique and special, I'm just saying that she definitely goes for men she has common ground with before taking anything else into consideration. Those men are going to skew towards weird. With that said, I don't think any of the men she's been known to hang around are ugly, they're just unconventional like she is. 

Someone a few years ago made a chart of musicians she's probably attracted to, and you'd probably rate all of them as sub 5. Wonder if I can find that in the archives or something.
 >>/35017/
Nothing to do with disagreeing with me personally. It's just that if you can't argue a point and instantly go for basic insults like "incel", "virgin", "small dick", etc., you're probably a retarded soycuck.
There's a pattern connecting the person's behavior and their physiognomy, as proven by the screenshots.
 >>/35021/
I didn't mention it but yeah I thought about her being into the pretentious\artsy\etc. types too.
I'd take a look at that chart, though how do you know she's attracted to them?
thumbnail of 19.png
thumbnail of 19.png
19 png
(1.06 MB, 1798x1044)
 >>/35021/
 >>/35023/
These anons were probably half joking but there's definitely something to it. I don't see super clear patterns in these men but it's obvious she simply likes pretentious artsy types as you said.
 >>/35024/
Idk if this is a deflection tactic or if you genuinely aren't understanding. Kinda like Poe's Law.
People of all levels of looks could use those insults, but the point is that it's typically the "soy" people who do it.
 >>/35025/
Seems like 4 above average looking men, and 2 average ones. All dark haired, idk their heights but doubt she's into manlets. All at a healthy weight or underweight. All white. Interestingly only one of those pics is unfiltered.
 >>/35027/
 >>/35025/
The top left pic is the only photo of a man she ever posted anywhere and she captioned him with "this is the style icon men should have" or something like that, btw
 >>/35028/
My theory is that they're mentally weak, so they align themselves with social groups, wherein they copy what others in the group do and say, hence the unoriginal repeated insults.
And the truth is that a person's personality/character is partially reflected in their physical appearance.
 >>/35032/
Ok, just to be clear the "social group" you're referring to is 99% of people, because everyone maintains the belief that most people can get partners.
 >>/35038/
The logical continuation is to point out that most people get partners regardless of their looks, and that women chasing chad is a myth created by embittered men. 
Attractive people do get more opportunities in dating, but that could never be the sole reason others can go their entire life without having a relationship.
 >>/35039/
No, you're incorrect on some points. First, there's a recent stat that showed that something like 30% of men 20-29 are virgins, so plenty of men ARE getting ignored.
Second, women DO chase chad. They might begrudgingly tolerate being with a sub8, but the fact is that the man they truly want is indeed a chad. That's why women think that dating their looksmatch is "settling". Their main objective is chad only.
Third, women being shallow and hypergamous IS the reason so many men are single. It's actually the reason women are single too. The "career women" are a great example of this. Women want a man richer than themselves, but the wealthier the woman is, the smaller her options are. They are so fucking retarded that they hypergamy themselves out of the dating market. And of course dating down (or across) is never an option for them.
 >>/35002/
One psych eval in highschool doesn't approve you for neetbux but by all means continue being delusional. Most people on ssi don't go back to work and someone like her who gets handed things definitely isn't the exception. It's not like she's the person who has a family to feed or the person who doesn't have a guy to let her stay over
Why do you people engage with the essaytranny? Do you enjoy having the same incelwiki talking points copypasted over and over in every thread?
 >>/35061/
No, it's different. Man don't care about height as much as women do because they are not shallow. You have to be tall to be a model, because being tall is an universally desirable feature regardless of the gender and a tall woman is more likely to give you tall kids.
 >>/35066/
You have to be tall to be a model because the runway is ran by gay men who see women as hangers, and we all know human sexuality isn't based on how we want our kids to look and act otherwise we'd all go for high test women with big muscles and broad shoulders lmao.
 >>/35056/
Shortest women have always the biggest delusions about height. I think that the entire 6ft incel meme/talking point was born because of them.
 >>/35022/
 >>/35004/
As you have been told countless times before, your delusions aren't worth entertaining.
There is nothing to discuss with severely mentally ill attention-whores like you.
 >>/35066/
> Man don't care about height as much as women do because they are not shallow.
Cope, manlet.
Men don't care as much about height because probably 95% of women are in the 160-170cm spectrum, which is all just a variant of small.
 >>/35075/
> Cope manlet
I'm 6'1 but okay. Cool social shaming tactic I guess
> Men don't care as much about height because probably 95% of women are in the 160-170cm spectrum, which is all just a variant of small.
I hope you are not being serious
 >>/35070/
> we all know human sexuality isn't based on how we want our kids to look and act
That's exactly what sexual selection is based on
> otherwise we'd all go for high test women with big muscles and broad shoulders lmao.
Non sequitur
 >>/35061/
That's a retarded statement because EVERY woman is desirable. Short, tall, thin, fat, ugly, good looking, rich, poor, etc.
There's effectively no woman who hasn't received a mountain of interest ever since they were 12 or something.
 >>/35071/
My experience confirms this. The only women to ever mention height to me were around 5'0. Though that's not to say other women aren't also demanding in this department. Just possibly less so
You guys don't get it. Ken likes tall men because that caters to her ddlg fantasies. She wants to think of her boyfriend as her father and herself as his child.
 >>/35085/
> ddlg fantasies. She wants to think of her boyfriend as her father and herself as his child.

Are women really into this? Can't they see how degrading that is?
 >>/35088/
Typically it's only women who were sexually abused as kids\teens. They (on some level) know how degrading it is, they just don't care, they get off on it.
(Note that I'm not saying this is the case with Ken)
 >>/35086/
They absolutely do, but IME it's typically the short ones who will have this violent hatred for short/average men.
I assume it's because they resent that that's their looksmatch, and not Chad.
 >>/35090/
Is it just a sexual thing or do they also romantically fantasize about it? I don't think any kind of love can be born from such an exploitative and codependent relationship.
 >>/35095/
It's definitely just a sexual thing, like a trauma fetish.
Honestly, I don't think women share the same concept of "Romance" or "Love" as men do. To a woman, "Love" is just "Wow, I really managed to snag a good/hot/Chad man, I sure don't want to lose him from my boyfriend slot.". "Romance" is just "Wow, this man is doing a lot of things for me, I sure am enjoying this.".
It's a hard pill to swallow, but women really do perceive the world COMPLETELY differently than men do, so it makes no sense to look for ("male") romance in a woman.
I miss Gilbert. He brought a sprinkle of color among the misogynistic platitudes of the essayposter and the aimless ramblings about facial features.
thumbnail of first weed experience.jpg
thumbnail of first weed experience.jpg
first weed... jpg
(239.97 KB, 774x1260)
 >>/34984/
> she could have roommates
In her dream journal it's implied that she lives alone in her apartment, which is a bit of a mistery how she can afford it.

Btw how much longer before her hipster friends persuade her to do drugs and be filmed in "artistic projects" Eric Hovermale style?
 >>/35128/
> my stomach sank as i realised i wasnt being recorded smoking weed by my friend and called him to apologise profusely
Lmfao at the copers saying she improved mentally, Autism is for LIFE
 >>/35128/
That sounds like an analogy for virginity. ie she told one man she'd lose it with him, but then ended up banging some other man first.
 >>/35173/
It literally isn’t implied that she lives alone in this. It’s a fucking dream where she was living with people she did not actually live with. That’s also from two years ago when it was confirmed she had a roommate.
 >>/35175/
Shit it’s from one year ago but my point stands. Nothing about that dream implies she lives alone. It only means she doesn’t actually live with “huck and calder” (what the fuck are these names?)
 >>/35233/
It was an anonymous reddit she assumed was private and adds up with everything confirmed about the guy. I mean she got a restraining order against him after he came to her house with a loaded gun, that’s much crazier than having sex with someone who doesn’t want it. I don’t think she’s ever been a lying type anyway.
 >>/35235/
Maybe this one is subconsciously about feeling tainted for having sex, or getting tattoos, or doing drugs\alcohol.
If not, then I must say women's insecurities are pretty retarded.
 >>/35245/
> in a thread where a womans entire face has been nitpicked to oblivion thousands of times
> womens insecurities don’t make sense
 >>/35246/
I mean, men openly get hated for not being 6ft+ or not making 6+ figures, and they can't even socially complain about that lest they get attacked further. It's retarded for women, who have 0 consequences for being unattractive, to be insecure.
 >>/35254/
i think this one is the original and the other one is maybe an edit. i remember seeing this one first. but i guess there's really no way of knowing.
 >>/35264/
Women hyperfixate on their own insecurities and shames, men at fault, as usual. Nobody's calling women sluts for wearing swimsuits.
 >>/35267/
I too would encourage women to be more modest, though simply calling them sluts seems inefficient. But maybe I'm wrong here.
 >>/35269/
So two men in her life are bad, therefore all men are bad?
 >>/35265/
You know damn well if a pic of Ken in a swimsuit got posted this entire thread would be swarming with people calling her a disgusting whore. That happens even when she wears regular outfits.
 >>/35272/
My point still stands. Even if a couple of people say that, you can't blame the entirety of men for it.
Also, people in general really need to learn the difference between someone saying something because they really mean it, and someone saying something just to provoke others.
 >>/35272/
> if a pic of Ken in a swimsuit got posted this entire thread would be swarming with people calling her a disgusting whore.
If the picture was taken at the beach with her friends without intentionally showing her ass on cam or doing sexually alluring poses, then I don't think people would call her a slut.
thumbnail of 1 cover.png
thumbnail of 1 cover.png
1 cover png
(3.42 MB, 2550x3300)
 >>/35117/
It felt like a day, been busy with my research.

> brought color
As described in [Foreword by Jose Ortega y Gasset] or felt in [Would]?

I gave [Would] and its sister poems funny discussion questions in case someone became too emotional.

 >>/35123/
Same, it's the reason I wrote this book series about kennedi:
https://www.amazon.com/000-Graphemes-Book/dp/B0CK3ZZ2CN
 >>/35173/
i wonder if her friends know about this?
i would be kinda creeped out if i saw that one of my friends had a blog where they wrote their dream adventures with me
 >>/35273/
Please don't take this the wrong way, essayposter, but there's reason if you're stuck here instead of having an active and fulfilling social life and no, the reason is not women.
 >>/35290/
Not triggered, just pointing out retardation.
 >>/35293/
Technically correct, but the thing is, me being a turbo autist doesn't negate the fact that women really do do bad things, and they really do act retarded.
I could be the #1 chad of the world, and it'd still be true that women say and do stupid shit.
 >>/35302/
> Not triggered, just pointing out retardation.
You are incredibly easily triggered all the time.
You'd fit well in with the fragile ego twitter crowd, because you are essentially exactly the same, going on about the same BS. All. The. Fucking. Time.
 >>/35303/
Honestly, this sounds like a made up story that's posted to get le updoots.
> le super terrible evil incel constantly hateful and dating a teen, never giving her anything and being mean to her
It just sounds like a childish strawman.
 >>/35309/
Not him, but how complaining about women is attention-whoring? The real insufferable attention whore is Gilbert who makes everything about himself.
 >>/35308/
Maybe I'm missing something here, but just don't date them lol. Were people not taught about "stranger danger" 20 years ago? Is it not painfully obvious that a 27yo being into a 17yo is a bad sign? Come on.
 >>/35309/
I'm fine with being criticized, I'm not a woman.
Also, copying what the other person said is a low IQ retort. Like a "no u" on the playground.
 >>/35310/
They're both equally pointless in this thread.
They're both just off-topic garbage productions and attention-whoring to bring up their delusions any time they can.

 >>/35312/
> I'm fine with being criticized
Oh suuuure, you have clearly proven that countless times in the past.
 >>/35311/
> Is it not painfully obvious that a 27yo being into a 17yo is a bad sign?
She gets off on that. She has daddy issues.
He didn't turn out violent and mentally ill in a day btw. He was already like that and she didn't care. 
You reap what you sow.
 >>/35318/
It sounds like she's trying to combine the loser who turns her on, with a stable wealthy man. In other words, Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.
 >>/35325/
A woman dating multiple losers just because they were good looking? No way, that never happens. R*ddit keeps saying it's all about the personality, how could this be???
Also, notice how women ALWAYS take any opportunity to humble brag about their bf's height.
 >>/35327/
Probably coddling. Not experiencing pressures and difficulties in life makes it so a person has zero need to evolve/mature, so they don't.
Additionally, people who were molested as kids\teens tend to stay at the mental age they were when they were abused.
(Not saying either of these are what happened to Ken, just offering explanations)
thumbnail of IQ 1.jpg
thumbnail of IQ 1.jpg
IQ 1 jpg
(520.27 KB, 1080x1993)
thumbnail of IQ 2.jpg
thumbnail of IQ 2.jpg
IQ 2 jpg
(286.57 KB, 1080x1111)
 >>/35327/
> "IQ went down by a couple dozen points because of SSRIs" - Kennedi Cotarelo
Lmfao, it has nothing to do with the abuse of LSD, DXM, shrooms,etc...
 >>/35330/
> a decade of SSRIs, from age 7 to 17. Why is this even legal?
> plenty of people's lives have nearly been ruined by them
> screwed over by (...) the psychiatric system
Huh. I wonder what's Ken's stance on trannies.
 >>/35353/
Man, I know I dunk on women a lot, but seeing someone so messed up that they get THIS bothered over something innocuous, really makes me wish we could help these people.
That said, what are the chances that this bf was just desperate and was only jumping through dozens of hoops just to not lose his gf and be alone? I mean come on.
Also hehehehe that post implies Ken has had sex hehehehehe heeheehee.
 >>/35353/
She put the man on nofap, no fucking shit he's doing anything to be able to bust a nut. Fucking IRONICALLY, it reads like a femdom orgasm denial CFNM sissification netorare porn fiction.
> Mlady please I've been so good. I've read all the feminist books. I've repeated the mantras about porn being bad. I've eaten you out for 20 minutes every day. Can I PLEASE have my monthly orgasm mistress? Please remove my cock cage and let me go pew pew PLEASE
 >>/35355/
She had no problem sending this retard to the chastity cage via emotional blackmail, describing his addiction as "selfishness and cognitive dissonance"
Her approach to dealing with her bf's issue is just to patrol his life and then have a panic attack if she catches him and (implied) break up.
It's quite sadistic
 >>/35355/
> What's mental about that?
really?

> had a mental breakdown because her boyfriend watched porn
> forced him to go to therapy
> forced him to read anti-porn feminist books
> brainwashed him into thinking that he was evil for making use of pornography
> made him feel guilty for BEING AROUSED BY A SEX SCENE IN A FUCKING MOVIE 
> convinced herself that he became an entire different person just because he dropped porn

She either insane or very low IQ. This poor man has gone through hell to satisfy her insane delusions.
 >>/35360/
Oh he does have an issue, which is why he consumed porn privately despite espousing anti porn rhetoric in public according to Kennedi's post.
Sidenote, how often do you watch porn anon?
 >>/35362/
Idk much about him, but that's not an issue, he likely just wanted to but a nut. He probably doesn't believe in any of the anti-porn bullshit, and is only echoing her stances so she doesn't leave him. The fucking things some men will do to just have anyone in the girlfriend slot. And to answer your question, I watch it every 1-2 days.
 >>/35366/
My friend, you are a turbo autist, and you really ought to improve the quality level of your posts, but I'll give you props for knowing about Eva and Lain.
 >>/35370/
No, not that. Preferably something at least tangentially related to the topic of the thread. Maybe some songs\anime\art\etc that you and Ken both know, and that you'd like to discuss. Something like that.
The absolute state of Ken threads. A guy she knew 13 years ago posting his poetry, the essayposter having meltdowns every single day, and years old reddit posts being analyzed. We're starving. We might just die of starvation at this point.
 >>/35361/
He lied to her about something extremely important to her. If he didn't wanna quit, shouldn't have lied. It's a matter of trust, not even the porn. He broke her trust. And her issue with porn is understandable considering she's known people in the sex industry and Ken herself has sexual trauma. 

He made his bed and lied in it. Don't lie to people you want to be with, especially if you're not prepared for the consequences.
 >>/35375/
> If he didn't wanna quit, shouldn't have lied.
Yes, addicts shouldn''t lie about their addiction. Very insightful.
Just fuck off with your woman-level analysis of human behaviour.
Can't even believe im taking the essayposters side on this.
 >>/35372/
Well, for one, it's pretty retarded. Posting pics of one's own body is not only a completely different process ("sending" vs "receiving"), it's also on a different scale of severity. Looking at women isn't cheating, but posting your own nudes is. It's not complicated.
Two, portmanteaus like "pornsick" again remind me, ironically, of porn terms. ("cumdump", "bitchgasm", etc.), which combined with the orgasm control scenario described in the prior screenshot, makes me theorize the possibility that this whole anti-porn thing is actually a kind of sexual fetish involving control in some way. Which would also line up with her self-shame, and the fact that people being abused sometimes give them a fetish, as messed up as that sounds. (Though I'm not claiming this is what's happening with Ken. It's just a theory.)
Three, this is only partially present in that pic, but women don't seem to understand the compartmentalization of physical sex and emotional attachment. Women who don't understand this get REALLY fucking pissed and start bringing up the "virgin/whore complex". To explain, sometimes men just wanna look at a woman to jerk off, they're not "making love" to her. It doesn't go beyond a physical aid to getting off. But women who are blinded by their hatred of men won't believe it's an innocent action, and will take it as an excuse to further hate men.
Four, I can kinda understand women's issue with men jerking off to other women. But the fact is, there are times where the man will want to cum and the woman will be unavailable to help, so in the interest of him not suffering with being pent up, women should just understand that jerking off is purely physical, and shouldn't stress about it. (As long as it's not ACTUALLY a problem)
Five, this whole thing is mega retarded, because as I've said before,the TRUE issue isn't the porn itself, but rather the woman's own trauma or mental issues that cause her to obsess over stuff like this.
Maybe we can post about other things? :^3

https://ibb.co/swNV649
https://ibb.co/56HW2T8
https://ibb.co/wzCwgC1
 >>/35375/
You are technically correct, if her terms are unacceptable to him, he should have just politely left her. Although that point would be more easily accepted if you acknowledged how retarded it sounds.
And while I really don't approve of it, you should consider that maybe he was just desperate and would do a ton of things to just not lose his gf.
 >>/35381/
Read the post, the guy had to put stickies and notes on his mirror to convince himself to stop watching, that sounds like someone who's not in control. 
Furthermore, if he didnt have a problem he would just stop watching while dating her, since he knew how neurotic she is about it.
 >>/35387/
I don't think he posted those to convince himself. I suspect he did it just to appease her.
Also, there's a huge difference between being a porn addict, and fapping at all. Him wanting to continue fapping at a normal frequency doesn't mean he has a problem. You gotta read between the lines and not take things at face value.
 >>/35394/
Let it be known there's a difference between being suddenly cut off from a close friend, and someone not responding to an instagram DM.
 >>/35390/
If he didnt have an addiction he wouldn't soy out and do this >>/35357/
he would just continue living normally. 
She also says she rarely enters his room, so whats the point.
The most reasonable conclusion is he was a long term user, and when he stopped, he experienced powerful and frequent withdrawals and had to cope by using literary and empirical sources telling him its bad for him.
 >>/35397/
Again, I don't know him personally, so you could be totally right, but I heavily don't think he's a porn addict. These anti-porn people like to label everything as a porn addiction, so you can't take what they say literally. And him soying and complying with her demands could more easily be explained by typical simp behavior. Again, maybe he had a hard time getting any gf, and didn't wanna lose what he already had, even if it was annoying. Desperation can make people think like that.
 >>/35401/
It's not being unable to stop, it's that a libido needs to be taken care of from time to time. Which again is perfectly normal and healthy.
Totally unrelated, but do you eat meat? You seem unable to stop eating meat, you must be a meat addict. Start loading up the vegan propaganda.
 >>/35395/
> someone not responding to an instagram DM
I didn't mean that with ghosting. If she has never talked to you or if interaction with her is very short is not ghosting and it's valid.
 >>/35403/
Just making sure because some anons claim they were ghosted by girls in other threads when it was only being responded to a few times then forgotten. 

 >>/35402/
You can fap without porn, you know.
 >>/35400/
Yes I agree porn use isn't necessarily addiction, but in this situation I would say it is, given his behaviour and details implying he knew he was "betraying" her when she caught him, as she recounts in the latter portion of the first paragraph here >>/35353/
 >>/35404/
Indeed, you can fap without porn, that's very true. Problem is, anti-porn people STILL have a problem with that. They have a problem with hentai too, and no women are being "objectified" there.
Which again points to the REAL problem being the woman's own mental issues leading to obsession, not the porn itself. It's all a bullshit rationalization.
 >>/35405/
They have already been discussed here countless times and now the essayposter is just doing is usual song and dance so the thread is even more repetitive than usual.
 >>/35405/
Yeah I have no idea what that anon means.
 >>/35402/
You don't need to act on every impulse you have, you're not an animal.
Meat is a necessary part of a human diet, however you don't need to touch yourself every time you're aroused.
 >>/35405/
Selfishly, yes. You're hoarding material people have requested to archive in the past and that another anon asked you recently to repost. Post the originals as well.
 >>/35406/
The "betrayal" comes from her not wanting him to fap, and him wanting to do it. Nothing there suggests that he's addicted in any way. Shit, maybe she "wasn't in the mood" for sex for 2+ weeks, so he was super pent up.
If you tell me he fapped 5 times per day, fapped instead of having sex, fapped instead of going to work, spent 4 hours per day fapping, or something like that, I'll agree it might be an addiction. But otherwise it really just sounds like a normal libido.
 >>/35409/
You don't need to every time necessarily, no, but sexual release is still healthy (and arguably necessary). Doing it in a appropriate way is perfectly fine.
 >>/35411/
> The "betrayal" comes from her not wanting him to fap
It comes from her wanting him to not watch porn. It's not about fapping. As already said, she has sexual trauma and knows women who have done porn and prostitution so it's something she knows a lot about from the woman's side of things.
 >>/35414/
I personally saw one goofy old pic of Ken many years ago and it caught my eye, then I realized threads about her exist, and here I am.
 >>/35416/
You still haven't made a good point for how he's addicted. If he were dating any other woman, what he does would be seen as normal.
Also, don't get me started on the porn industry, I already essaypost enough.
 >>/35416/
Define "trauma". Why doesn't she just take responsibility for her own hangups? I swear men and women didn't play these stupid mental games even 10/20 years ago.
 >>/35408/
Wrong, none of these screenshots have been posted or discussed before.
Btw why do you seethe so much over essayposter?
He can express his opinions as much as he wants as long as he is on topic. You are free to counter-argue his points if you disagree with him.
 >>/35420/
I say define it cause real trauma in my eyes is hearing a door bang shut and ducking for cover involuntary because you think you're about to have your ass shot up into your throat.
 >>/35414/
Because other girls are worthless to think about when they arent entertaining anons or posting their nudes. 
 >>/35415/
> Doing it in a appropriate way is perfectly fine
Yes, like with your gf, not secretly and shamefully using porn in private because you're addicted.
 >>/35425/
See, you're doing the thing I said about anti-porn people assigning evil onto someone's actions.
I'll say it directly: You are mistaken. You are wrong. There is no addiction. There is no secret private shame. There is only normal behavior viewed through the lens of mental illness.
 >>/35424/
Very unlikely she was raped. If she was there would be a police report. That shit is libel by the way. Most likely she just had a bad sexual encounter where she felt pressured to put out. That doesn't feel great but that's life. Still not an excuse for her. Also you replying with a question mark makes me think you're probably some leftoid faggot. Talk like a human please. Keep the irony poisoning under wraps for one fucking second.
Real porn addicts fap everyday several hours a day. She would have caught on it if that had been the case.
 >>/35427/
Police reports aren't publicly available, I don't know why you expect that to be the case. She successfully got a restraining order against him which requires going to court several times and proving there is a real danger and threat to your wellbeing.
 >>/35428/
Porn addiction is bunk. You have to have really low standards for what qualifies as a real addiction if even people doing that for hours a day qualifies. Hard drugs are addictive. Most porn "addicts" are simply people with too much free time. Force them to work a job or live surrounded by people and magically they won't jerk off in public. Amazing right? It's not a real addiction it's just a bad habit most of the time. Nofappers pretend it's a real burden but it's just a biological reality manifesting itself in a new form due to the era we live in.
 >>/35427/
> For its Uniform Crime Reports, the FBI defines rape as “penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.”
I think I'm going to stop coming here for good, for my mental health. This is depressing. She's a person.
 >>/35429/
I expect police reports to be publicly available when crimes have been committed, yes. I don't know why you wouldn't* expect that to be the case.

There's more merit to the restraining order/gun though, I'll give you that.
 >>/35436/
Step one: don't tell everyone to sympathy bait. If you ever wanna fucking do something like that then just disappear without warning. Be a man.
 >>/35438/
I like cute girls, and I like talking about cute girls. I find Ken's personality and past fascinating like everyone else ITT but I find myself thinking about her in a way that makes her more like a book character than a human being. I don't know. Seeing everyone post about her like she's a philosophical problem instead of a person actually experiencing things that led her to be who she is is uncomfortable and making me realize what I'm doing here. Just being honest here, not looking for sympathy. I feel bad when I've caught myself thinking like this about Marky too, even if she's much different from Ken. I just don't want to do this anymore. Cheers. Pray I have the strength to stay away. And Ken I am sorry if you ever read the dehumanizing things I and other people posted. It's mostly for laughs.
 >>/35433/
PIED is becoming endemic among young men and is positively correlated with increased porn use.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5039517/#:~:text=Since%20then%2C%20evidence%20has%20mounted%20that%20Internet%20pornography%20may%20be%20a%20factor%20in%20the%20rapid%20surge%20in%20rates%20of%20sexual%20dysfunction.%20Nearly%20six%20out%20of%2010%20of%203962%20visitors%20seeking%20help%20on%20the%20prominent%20%E2%80%9CMedHelp.org%20ED%20Forum%E2%80%9D%2C%20who%20mentioned%20their%20ages%2C%20were%20younger%20than%2025.
///
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5039517/#:~:text=This%20survey%20of%20434%20men,my%20partner%E2%80%9D%20%5B44%5D.
 >>/35436/
If that wasn't your first thought when you first came to these threads, you'll 100% be here again, and when you are, don't do this larp again.
 >>/35443/
That's just called putting your emotion aside and looking at a situation logically\objectively. There's nothing bad about it, though I can understand the distress if you're not used to doing it.
But if you can't accept that, and it really is bothering you, then you should indeed not engage as much in the thread. Maybe just check it out occasionally and quickly scan for links or new images or something.
Gotta look out for your mental state first. At least you were self aware to realize what's happening, which is good.
 >>/35444/
I'm not the guy you're replying to, but I suspect that ED is moreso caused by the state of the world, specifically the dating market and women in general, rather than porn use itself.
In other words, if those men had a loving woman to warm their blood and take care of his sexual needs, there'd be way less PE.
 >>/35444/
Not to be a redditor but regardless of the outcome of this study it doesn't really invalidate my point. My point's more that for most porn "addicts" it's not an addiction in the same way that drinking is an addiction or any other form of substance abuse. There are things in life that can and will force you to stop immediately so let's not pretend the main issue is pornography itself.
 >>/35447/
> all of mens issues are caused by women
These men have girlfriends, thats how they find out they have PIED.
 >>/35334/
> people prefer analog over digital
Love how kennedi finds a way to slip her love of music into a random thread about trans people.
I think this is why I browse these threads, sometimes when I'm walking on the street I look at someone and I wish I could learn all about them.
 >>/35449/
Porn use is motivated by the same neurological structures that create substance addiction, video games, scrolling social media.
Notice how the perceived severity of those activities varies, I agree that porn use for most people is just a mild way to kill boredom and deal with a boner, but for others it can develop into something more serious, in the same way that people can be addicted to cocaine whereas others can just do it here and there with no issues.
All addiction needs to be taken seriously, not just people who are hooked on heroin.
 >>/35451/
In an effort to research the issue of ED, could it be that they technically do have gfs, but those gfs aren't stimulating for them? Either physically or emotionally?
If he's fapping for 4 hours per day that's one thing, but if he's  otherwise normal and he doesn't get it up for the gf, there might be something more there. What's the rate of this issue happening over multiple gfs?
 >>/35452/
Maybe, but erections can be boiled down to a natural physical response to stimulation. if you were getting sucked through a glory hole you would get hard right? However it's possible someone can be so unattractive that they counteract that stimulation, in which case I'd wonder why that man would even be dealing with her to begin with.
This is what the study has to say about the matter: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5039517/#:~:text=This%20review%20also,and%20arousal%20declines.
 >>/35453/
> in which case I'd wonder why that man would even be dealing with her to begin with
Easy answer: Because he doesn't want to be alone. I dare say that the vast majority of men are tolerating a heap of shit from their gfs, just so they don't have to be alone.
 >>/35454/
If your gf is so ugly you cant even fuck her AND shes giving you shit theres 0 reason to stay with her.
It's true men don't want to be alone, but for the most part they are alone, not getting with sub5s.
I would link another study but I'm starting to feel like an autist so I'll stop posting for the night.
 >>/35455/
That would be the correct thing to do, except modern men are exceedingly desperate. It really wouldn't surprise me if a man had zero attraction to a woman, but was still with her just to fill the girlfriend slot.
 >>/35302/
> me being a turbo autist doesn't negate the fact that women really do do bad things, and they really do act retarded

Wrong. Being a turbo autistic is precisely the origin of your black and white thinking, which makes you believe that all women are retarded and evil, as if it was a solid fact instead of a sweeping generalization. You lack subtlety and discernment. Your turbo autism is also the reason why you're impervious to criticism and differing opinions, which makes you stubborn, fixated, and a pain in the ass.
 >>/35459/
You're retarded. There are very clearly a myriad of bad things women do. My autism has nothing to do with it.
How's my autism making women initiate 70% of divorces, huh? How's it making them have zero accountability and always deflect blame? How's it making them chase men above their league? How's it making them indulge in narcissism and constantly whore for attention? Do tell.
Plus, when the fuck have I been impervious to criticism? You're making shit up. If there's a specific point you disagree with, speak up.
at an underground rave in sf right now and I see parish and his gf in front of my own eyes… will keep on the lookout for Ken.
thumbnail of 1585725709697.jpg
thumbnail of 1585725709697.jpg
1585725709697 jpg
(86.61 KB, 1061x675)
 >>/35394/
Don't believe this. They all say this and then they ghost you, usually in a sadistic fashion, and they will keep doing this because they have zero consequences and an endless supply of orbiters to talk to.
I've just been ghosted by a fembot who agreed with me on how ghosting is evil and that we would never do such a thing to each other. I made the mistake of believing her.
They are narc + low empathy, ghosting is shitty only when it happens to them.
 >>/35464/
Lemme guess, you drove all the way from somewhere like Vallejo or sac to try to stalk kennedi irl? And she doesn't even live in San Francisco. Fucking idiot. And if you ran into her what were you actually going to say? I hope your plan isnt to do anything insane or violent. taking a photo/video is the absolute furthest you should go, but I wonder where your head is at. You're the craziest person here for actually showing up. Whats the point in taking this irl anyway? there's a ton of other girls like her in sf who you could actually get to know, without the factor of them eventually realizing you're just a stalker who found them from a board
 >>/35477/
Calm down Jae. He just said that he accidentally met Parish at a rave party. All you are accusing him of is an insane projection on your side.
 >>/35478/
I know I'd get accused of being jae but this guy is truly stupid and stalking her friends irl. But people are ignoring it of course. He intentionally went to a specific event that one of her friends was at just because she's mentioned his name in a dream journal and taken a few pics with him. thats far too obsessed and makes me wonder what's his end goal? If he's only planning to take pics then sure I encourage it, but you should realize it wasn't a coincidence. Also he went alone to a rave and went on here to give live updates during. So he's retarded and barely living in reality
> intentionally went to a specific event that one of her friends was at 
he clearly said he just happened to see them by coincidence lmao calm down no one sought anyone out. you must be new here or you’re parish
 >>/35479/
no one cares about her friends lmao. it’s ken we care about which is the only reason her friends are brought up, bc they reflect her. her friends being seen at a rave doesn’t matter, it just means that ken might be there
 >>/35484/
When you see her in person, what do you want to happen tho? Unless you're the person saying rape, it's pointless otherwise. She won't want to talk to you. I'd rather her not feel like shes in danger, so she keeps posting. It's way more entertaining. If she lurks, she's definitely not going to take her accounts off private again now that people have started showing up places. She was already scared off by much smaller things. Even just leaving a comment on her YouTube channel would scare her and cause her to delete videos of concerts. And deleting her instagram, depop, twitter, last.fm..
 >>/35489/
Tbh I wouldn't be surprised if the person posting ncbi articles about porn addiction was her. She was doing the same thing on reddit.
 >>/35492/
doubt it, that anon was posting further up thread as well and made fun of the anon who said he was leaving for mental health, also wrote like a man
 >>/35479/
 >>/35477/
they probably posted that they were at a rave like the social media addicted junkies they are, so an anon posted that they saw them there as a troll. i guarantee this is the case for a few different reasons. one being that no one going to a rave in the middle of the night would whip out their phone to go on endchan. it was probably the same exact anon who claimed he saw ken at a slowdive show days ago when she doesn’t even give a fuck about that kind of music.
Parish and Jae obviously lurk here, probably more than Ken herself does since she’s used to us and they’re not. My guess is that one of them saw what was being posted and panicked which made her wipe everything.
 >>/35499/
Meant Parish and Alexa. Not Jae. But Jae definitely lurks too. Who fucking knows anymore. Now we’re going to get no updates at all.
 >>/35503/
Who knows, it was 50 images up and now it's down to 10. Maybe she thought it would look too obvious and draw more attention if she deleted the entire account. Everything showing any of her friends is gone now. And the only things left up of SF are touristic attractions like the carousel at pier 39, the art museum, and the hotel she stayed in when she visited which was "Inn San Francisco"
thumbnail of toothy smile.png
thumbnail of toothy smile.png
toothy... png
(361.84 KB, 540x960)
thumbnail of smile.jpg
thumbnail of smile.jpg
smile jpg
(64.76 KB, 414x532)
 >>/35521/
She doesn't show her teeth because when she does it, her nose flattens and widens, and she is self conscious.  Her smiles are almost always with sealed lips because of that. Lifting the upper lip causes her nose to look even bigger and wider. It has nothing to do with her teeth, as other anons suggested.
thumbnail of C0D4CAB4-EAC8-4002-B186-3DEEBE4776DA.jpeg
thumbnail of C0D4CAB4-EAC8-4002-B186-3DEEBE4776DA.jpeg
C0D4CAB4-EAC8-4002-B1... jpeg
(674.71 KB, 2416x2416)
thumbnail of FFB8A0D6-D557-4C5E-8F12-1EE35B81CBF5.jpeg
thumbnail of FFB8A0D6-D557-4C5E-8F12-1EE35B81CBF5.jpeg
FFB8A0D6-D557-4C5E-8F... jpeg
(522.15 KB, 1284x860)
thumbnail of FC864704-1E7B-4283-ADF3-A69B51AAA135.jpeg
thumbnail of FC864704-1E7B-4283-ADF3-A69B51AAA135.jpeg
FC864704-1E7B-4283-AD... jpeg
(678.13 KB, 2365x2365)
hi everyone
I’m the same anon who posted  >>/35464/
 and did not know it would get this much attention. Yes, I happened to be at the underground rave and recognize parish because of his facial hair, long hair, and his signature mask (pic related.) I did not go to this rave intending to stalk ken or anything like that. When I think about it, it makes sense that parish was there since he is friends with at least one of the DJ’s (DJ stress actual). They both Dj’d yesterday at a different venue in SF

Unfortunately the pics are quite blurry as it was nighttime and I was a bit far as I didn’t want to look suspicious by coming closer, although I wish I came up closer to confirm if Ken was there. The girl next to him was either Ken or Alexa. if it was Alexa, she looks uncannily similar to Ken, face and body-wise. They were dancing quite a bit. 

 >>/35477/ 
no anon. I was with my friends. I had no idea her friends would be there. I would never do that

 >>/35479/
Again I had no idea her friends would be there but I ended up seeing them. I was with my friends I didn’t go alone 

 >>/35490/
Not trolling I saw them with my own eyes although more from afar 

 >>/35497/
Nope. Parish and his gf ig is on private so I wouldn’t have known they were there
Well now we know why she deleted her dream journal and all the pics with her friends.
Fret not kenbros, it seems that she will still attention-whore, hence she didn't delete everything.
 >>/35538/
least autistic sf raver. btw imagine if they’re actually scared because of this, when his goal is to be a successful famous musician anyway.
 >>/35497/
> no one going to a rave in the middle of the night would whip out their phone to go on endchan
never underestimate kenheads' autism
 >>/35548/
I “magically” knew that because I follow a lot of DJ’s on Instagram and a flyer had been posted by stress actual that also had Parish’s name there.
i've never been to a rave, but aren't they like nightclubs on steroids? a total assault on the senses? is this something that noted smol bean autist ken can enjoy or even handle?
 >>/35558/
smol bean also goes to punk shows which are a total assault on the senses. I’ve been to many and they all stink to high heavens and are sometimes super crowded to the point where you can’t move, especially near the mosh pit. at all these events you are bombarded with a concoction of smells and sounds. it started smelling like cat poop at this one.
 >>/35558/
 >>/35559/
I don't get it, do normies actually like doing stuff like this? What are the chances they don't really care but just do it to appear "normal"?
Normies consuming stupid amounts of alcohol and getting blackout drunk already sounds retarded enough.
 >>/35565/
Yeah, something like that. Like how people go to bars to hook up, not to actually sit there and drink.
 >>/35564/
Please enlighten me if I'm being retarded here, but I imagine you go to these events, and 90% of the songs are shit, so most of the time you just wait until a song you like actually comes on.
Again maybe this is just my autism, but wouldn't having your friends in your house plus using a speaker be far more effective? I'd be far cheaper too.
 >>/35567/
> 90% of the songs are shit
that's just your opinion (fwiw i tend to agree; the generic form of dance music that began with disco has ironically ruined "dance" music). but consider the following:

1. turbonormies (majority of the population) simply don't care, they just want a loud beat, a sort of relentless ambience, a constant motion. a firewall against awkward silences, if you will. 200 years ago it was a dude with a fiddle, it's nothing new
2. a good dj picks good songs
3. any big city has dozens (if not hundreds) of different club nights dedicated to specific themes/styles/genres/time periods, practically guaranteeing dud-free dancing for anyone with aligning tastes

> but wouldn't having your friends in your house plus using a speaker be far more effective
effective at hearing music you enjoy? sure, but non-autistic people like to be pleasantly surprised. that's probably one of the greatest pleasures in life, big or small. it's like hearing the intro to a great song sputtering through the car radio static just as you merge onto the freeway. intentionally searching, selecting and playing it on your phone doesn't have the same "oh hell yes" factor
 >>/35567/
These kinds of raves appeal to a niche audience because the picks are specialized and curated. So most of the people there were already familiar with the music and knew that they liked it, and it isn't the typical raveslut EDM shit. So most people are dancing the entire time to songs they genuinely like. 

But also, being in a public group dancing environment automatically makes dancing way more fun so the threshold for bad music goes up anyway
if I were ken I would just embrace my fame and stop caring. i would just view all of you as obsessive fan behavior and move on. because imagine how miserable it must be constantly living in fear that someone is gonna take a photo of you, stalk you online, show up to an event you’re at, or even discuss you. just someone posting her friends on here is enough to make her scrub her Flickr and delete her (public) “dream diary”. must be mentally exhausting.
thumbnail of de530545e0f3f62cd46168cf71ab1810ca951b1e39ba65d12b902156416e527d.png
thumbnail of de530545e0f3f62cd46168cf71ab1810ca951b1e39ba65d12b902156416e527d.png
de530545e0f3f62cd4616... png
(23.33 KB, 500x459)
 >>/35532/
You guys are my therapists... I can now read and even write her name without having a PTSD episode.

I hate how this thread is a minefield of images and posts about her, I have scrolled past most of this thread due to how sickening it is.

 >>/35383/
Give me a message you want in said creepypasta :^3
 >>/35574/
i think the window for such a switch (or even a balanced "normie" one) has passed. these threads are evidence items #1-15. not all people are equipped to handle fame/attention (however slight/esoteric), and ken clearly wants to dictate the terms of her online presence

as it recedes into the past, i'm more and more leaning towards her "online era" being an anomaly, an attempt at fitting in by donning a certain type of persona. there's a common thread of awkwardness that runs through her posted images, egirl with training wheels (that said, i do believe the majority of her interests are genuine (no one asked faget))

 >>/35580/
try putting yourself in her shoes for just a second
 >>/35585/
she should try stepping into my size 7s and looking at things from my perspective, maybe then she'd have a little sympathy and stop being such a snooty b*tch
 >>/35353/
> but it was still obvious that he wouldn't have had certain kinks and preferences if not for exposure to pornography ever.
I wonder what kinks he had that she had to satisfy.
 >>/35600/
What a pussy faggot. You talk big shit about "not taking criticism" but as soon as you have the floor, you run away like a fucking coward.
Next time you wanna start shit without being able to back it up, keep your mouth shut.
 >>/35618/
I'm curious too now that you mention it. Considering the overdramatization, I imagine it'd be something basic like anal or different sex positions.
 >>/35622/
 >>/35618/
Probably just rougher sex as portrayed in pornography, choking etc. She made a reddit post talking about how facefucking porn disgusts her, that can be found in a previous thread.
On that note, its retarded the archive hasnt been posted yet. Hopefully that guy stops teasing
 >>/35623/
 >>/35572/
Because I want to milk it to keep active these threads. They are almost 500 lengthy posts (493 to be exact) and it was barely discussed at all in the original thread where it was leaked. She talked about sex, cunnilingus, MDMA, ketamine, etc... and none of it was posted, which makes me wonder how many of you actually read all of it.

If you want the full archive now, instead of begging, start posting the vocaroo from the first thread, an instaloader zip of her deleted instagram and all the other stuff you are secretely hoarding.
 >>/35624/
> it was barely discussed at all in the original thread where it was leaked.
The board itself was young and naturally had less users.
> you are secretely hoarding.
You are genuinely mentally ill, but I enjoy the fact that the one anon who keeps calling people attention whoring schizos will seethe at the fact youre keeping this thread unkempt.
Good job anon! Make sure to post one of her reddit posts now (you have hundreds) so I have something to read through during lunch.
 >>/35623/
 >>/35627/
Which makes the anti-porn mentality even more retarded, if you think about it. They look up porn of the things they personally like, get offended, then go "Ugh, can't believe men are into this.".
 >>/35640/
Honestly, people really need to start giving these teens shit for doing OBVIOUSLY stupid shit like this. I mean seriously, HOW many fucking red flags does it take for her to realize?
And they met when she was 15. And he's a cuck. And she wonders if she's overreacting and it's just normal. This shit is borderline satire.
 >>/35640/
It honestly just reads like larp karma bait fanfic, the details regarding the abuser's baphomet tat and satanic imagery to extra villify the dude give it away. 
The post histories of those still active that replied to that bait just give away their autism too, just like /ourgirl/
I can't even describe the hate in my heart I have for autists, and they are just everywhere.
 >>/35641/
> This shit is borderline satire.
Lmfao
 >>/35640/
This is the classic e-girl/groomer relationship
> she wants to be treated like his daughter (daddy issues)
> he isolates and brands her with a tatoo like property
> degradeding fetishes (blood kinks, being subjugated, etc..)
> lot of mental illness and sociopathy from both parts

I wonder why Ken replied to this. Did she project herself onto this girl because of the ten years gap (17-27) or there is more to it?
 >>/35644/
She broke up with him in march 2019 when he supposedly sexually assaulted her. That comment was also posted on March, so it's probably a form of projection.
 >>/35649/
Man, I've held back on ranting about the "sex industry" multiple times now, and this pic almost triggered me hard. The fucking irony of someone into DDLG type shit accusing others of "masturbating to teenagers". Pure projection. And once again, the pattern of her purposefully seeking out content she dislikes, getting mad over it, and attacking other people because of it.
 >>/35624/
As I remember it, all of it was discussed at length, or at least the actually interesting posts. Obviously there wasn't a need to post screenshots of each individual post at the time when everyone could just read everything in the link.
> If you want the full archive now, instead of begging, start posting the vocaroo from the first thread, an instaloader zip of her deleted instagram
I do actually have both of those lol. You can continue what you're doing though, I don't really mind.
thumbnail of 1696070829553481.gif
thumbnail of 1696070829553481.gif
1696070829553481 gif
(1.49 MB, 1024x782)
No one is reacting to the criminally funny pic I posted TwT

 >>/35650/
This is going to be the only post about her I address, before taking time off due to PTSD (this is what I get for reading backwards):
1) It's eerie how [Quixotic regret] predicted this and my pained reaction.
2) If she likes the attention it's ok, otherwise everyone may want to refrain from posting about her.
 >>/35650/
> She's also bipolar and does extremely self-destructive things to 'feel something' without tihnking
> How do pornsick people even
I just hate to reiterate how much I hate autists, they are so criminally unintrospective, socially unaware people.
 >>/35652/
Yea i saw that story on /int/ earlier gilbert, I laughed. uwu
 >>/35651/
People who brag but don't share should be permabanned from this board. 
I will keep posting even if there are parasites like you, because this is how the internet should be. Fortunately there are other anons who agree with me and keep sharing.
 >>/35662/
Based, I agree with basically everything she said here.
The last half of the second paragraph is quite interesting, there seems to be some solipsism\projection there.
 >>/35663/
> The last half of the second paragraph is quite interesting, there seems to be some solipsism\projection there.

Yeah Gilbert said that she used to read loli hentai as a teenager and I don't think he was lying.
My eyes glaze over so damn hard when the thread is just a circlejerk of debates and politics and personal ideologies. So fucking insufferable and makes me want to not even check the damn thread. Don’t you guys have halfchan and a groupchat of choice for this?
 >>/35671/
I don’t think the same few people arguing in circles every single day is better than the thread only being active when something actually happens. It makes the threads hit bump limit quickly and clogs both the thread and catalog with bullshit no one has any interest in reading.
 >>/35664/
I would not take Gilbert at his word considering he has been in love with her since she was 11 and he's in his 30s, and is obviously batshit insane. But assuming he's telling the truth, they knew each other from when Ken was 11 to when she was 14, so her reading loli anywhere at that point isn't that weird, it's bad but it's something she obviously grew out of, if that is actually what she was looking at as a literal child. It's a totally different thing than an adult looking at loli manga, because the kid is innocently trying to see someone who is their own age.
 >>/35705/
Je, Tu, Il, Elle is not about lesbian sex. it has one lesbian sex scene and one straight sex scene. most of the movie is Chantal Akerman sitting alone and going on a date with a man.
thumbnail of cb842b432234df0333864d611cd42da3778c920c86f3801d5b0c7ec11f69afe8.jpg
thumbnail of cb842b432234df0333864d611cd42da3778c920c86f3801d5b0c7ec11f69afe8.jpg
cb842b432234df0333864... jpg
(82.23 KB, 600x525)
 >>/35716/
It's a meta-poem within a meta-anthology, retard. You cannot know what the meta-anthology is about until reading further into the books.

In Don Quixote, a meta-novel, you have to reach chapter ~8 so the narrator STOPS the story because he has run out of pages to read. The narrator has to go to the local market to find the rest of the manuscript for the story.

Also, don't push me your fantasies upon me. The only one who talked about certain things was her >://^3
 >>/35669/
When what's being discussed is kennedi's ideologically charged reddit posts, the discussion also will become ideological in nature.
Get better social skills you little aspie, then you might have enough friends to not care whether stalker threads are unorganized or not.
 >>/35718/
the reason she cut ties with you and you spammed her on 8chan is because of you being more and more creepy and sexual to her gilbert lol
Can someone repost the reddit thread she made where she says her bf described pornography as exquisitely titillating kaleidoscopic new imagery?
That shit was too funny but i forgot what thread it was posted in
thumbnail of img.jpg
thumbnail of img.jpg
img jpg
(63.52 KB, 600x985)
 >>/35720/
Hopefully my writing as I'm falling asleep doesn't suffer:
It's agonizing knowing that she might had suffered anguish due to immaturity.
It's enraging acknowledging my past self was dishonest with emotions.
It's hurtful conceiving I might have made her feel horrible and unattractive each time I dismissed her tender sensibilities, or insulted her honest attempts with my emotional denial. 
It's aching the regret of having been born too distant in time and place, and acted in a manner that worsened the distance. Perhaps I unconsciously thought she would always remain a constant in my life.
It's painful the jealousy she grew up by other men, while I still reject any woman that gets too close. In my defense, like half of the girls are not mother material.
I deserve this solitude for being too picky with women. I deserve every negative sentiment this thread related person incites because it's a bit of poetic justice. Back when she sought me, I neglected her; now that I want to seek her, I'm a thorn nearly forgotten to her.

These hypnagogic thoughts are the reason I can address your post without PTSD:
We used to cut ties all the times, lol. One time I posted on her FB post "I don't believe in feminism, not because it's wrong but because a world with feminism is not worth living in :^3" (almost a direct quote).

Naturally, she blocked me right after unblocking me :^3
 >>/35731/
I like how she realizes that type of language is "flowery" when it's said back to her lol.
Also, do you think she would actually satisfy her bf literally every time he asked? What if it was every day, or multiple times per day? What if only felt like it for 5 minutes, or 3 hours?
thumbnail of Dollchan Tools icon.png
thumbnail of Dollchan Tools icon.png
Dollchan Tools icon png
(4.99 KB, 481x366)
thumbnail of Settings icon.png
thumbnail of Settings icon.png
Settings icon png
(8.75 KB, 554x172)
thumbnail of Filters.png
thumbnail of Filters.png
Filters png
(36.98 KB, 527x472)
thumbnail of End result.png
thumbnail of End result.png
End result png
(98.84 KB, 893x530)
 >>/35767/
In order to not give our attention is for them to not catch it. Solution: hide attentionwhore posts automatically before they register in your cortex.

You will need:

1. Desktop web browser with addons/extensions support. Chrome, Firefox, Edge, and so on.

2. One of userscript execution addons:
Violenmonkey
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/violentmonkey/jinjaccalgkegednnccohejagnlnfdag
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/violentmonkey/
https://addons.opera.com/ru/extensions/details/violent-monkey/
Tampermonkey
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/tampermonkey/
https://addons.opera.com/ru/extensions/details/tampermonkey-beta/
https://www.microsoft.com/store/apps/9NBLGGH5162S
https://safari.tampermonkey.net/tampermonkey.safariextz

2. Dollchan Userscript
https://dollchan.net/extension/ (Click first link)

3. Now when script is installed, reload the thread and hover over icon in bottom right corner of your browser window, click the gearwheel icon - Settings

4. First tab inside Settings window is Filters, here's where we put filtering rules in.

5. There's base rule to hide floods/wipes already, we put ours on the second line:
| #words[agatha2](:^3)
Starting vertical line | in this case acts as a logical "OR" expression, you put it either at the end of each or at the beginning of a new filter rule, it moves to the back of previous line automatically after you press Apply.
 >>/35900/
they have a similar phenotype except ken is more delicate. mark my words there will be a jae gf reveal and she will also look like a faulty ken clone
thumbnail of kennedi.jpeg
thumbnail of kennedi.jpeg
kennedi jpeg
(26.45 KB, 299x300)
Previously:  >>/34896/

Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@kennedicotarelo

Letterboxd: https://letterboxd.com/heartbeat/

Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/user/flowerco

Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/194172735@N06/

Tumblr: https://throbbinggristle.tumblr.com/ (inactive)

Fragrantica: https://www.fragrantica.com/member/1299311 (inactive)

Blogspot: https://lovesickloveletters.blogspot.com/ (inactive)

RYM: https://rateyourmusic.com/~lovesick (inactive)

Post(s) action:


Moderation Help
Scope:
Duration: Days

Ban Type:


521 replies | 97 file
New Reply on thread #34896
Max 20 files0 B total