a random b banner

/b/ - Random

Anything posted here are autistic works of fiction, only a fool would take them seriously.


New Thread
X
Max 20 files0 B total
[New Thread]

Page: Prev [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] Next | View | Catalog | Banners | Logs


thumbnail of OIP-836145950.jpg
thumbnail of OIP-836145950.jpg
OIP-836145950 jpg
(7.39 KB, 200x255)
thumbnail of OIP-3060756456.jpg
thumbnail of OIP-3060756456.jpg
OIP-3060756... jpg
(28.02 KB, 474x711)
thumbnail of OIP-3506511954.jpg
thumbnail of OIP-3506511954.jpg
OIP-3506511954 jpg
(30.13 KB, 474x639)
thumbnail of OIP-2968804968.jpg
thumbnail of OIP-2968804968.jpg
OIP-2968804968 jpg
(24.3 KB, 474x451)







thumbnail of yipper.png
thumbnail of yipper.png
yipper png
(280.73 KB, 598x530)
Just over 15 years ago, when the Democrat-controlled House and the Democrat-controlled Senate were debating the healthcare proposals offered by the Democrat president, nearly everyone on the political right was unified in opposition. It may well have been the last time the right was united on anything, but it was indeed unified and resolute.

Congresswoman Michelle Bachmann (MN) warned that “This monstrosity of a bill will not only destroy the private healthcare market, it will lead to massive increases in premiums and rationed care.” Congressman (and eventual vice-presidential nominee and Speaker of the House) Paul Ryan (WI) complained that “This bill is a fiscal Frankenstein. It’s a government takeover that will explode costs and kill jobs.” Senator (and Republican Leader) Mitch McConnell (KY) insisted that Americans “want reforms that lower costs, not a trillion-dollar government experiment.”

Even the Heritage Foundation — in the news lately for purportedly exacerbating rifts in the conservative coalition — likewise agreed with everyone in the movement, insisting that Obamacare was a disaster waiting to happen and would keep none of the promises that it made, all while destroying what was good and valuable in the private insurance market.

More than a decade later, when it was clear that the system was in trouble and that only greater government intervention and spending could save it, the Heritage Foundation took something of a victory lap, detailing Obamacare’s manifest failures and arguing that it was long past time to scrap the whole experiment.

The ACA dramatically increased health insurance premiums and cost-sharing in the individual market…
The ACA collapsed insurer competition in the nation’s individual markets…
The ACA failed to meet official enrollment targets in the individual markets…
The ACA is pricing middle-class Americans out of individual market coverage…
The ACA expanded government coverage while wrecking the private individual health insurance market…
The ACA compromised access to care for persons — including those with pre-existing medical conditions — enrolled in the nation’s individual markets…
The ACA failed—and failed miserably to attract young people into the exchange insurance pools…
The ACA’s vaunted delivery reforms did not yield the anticipated savings.

Everything Republicans warned would happen did happen. And the Democrats’ response was to offer a massive “temporary” increase in subsidies to help paper over the failures. Again, every sentient person in the country insisted that doing so would be a disaster, that the subsidies would only increase costs, and that they would not be temporary.

Worse still, in addition to sticking their fingers in their ears and ignoring the experiences of the last decade and a half, the Democrats are actually blaming the Republicans for all of the healthcare system’s problems, insisting that the GOP is somehow responsible for their delusions.

Normal people, of course, think that the institutions created by Obamacare are destructive, costly, and ultimately ineffective. And we know they believe this because so many of them said so before the system was ever put in place. The Democrats disagree, and they will not be dissuaded from their course by any appeals to theory or experience. They want to keep the institutions and keep reforming them until they inevitably find the right formula.
2 replies omitted. Click to expand viewer

Trump floated the idea of giving low- and middle-income Americans a direct payment of $2,000 rather than providing a subsidy that is paid to insurance companies.

That would allow people to purchase their own insurance, Trump said in a Nov. 8 social media post. The president added that this would avoid putting more money into a health coverage system that, he said, provided inferior health coverage.

The White House is in discussion with lawmakers about the idea, Trump told reporters on Nov. 14.

“I’ve had personal talks with some Democrats,” he said, adding that the plan would allow consumers to negotiate their own price with an insurer.

Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) is drafting legislation for a similar plan now. His plan would send money directly to individual Health Savings Accounts, much like Trump suggested.

“They can use it to spend on healthcare, so they can buy direct health care, or they can buy insurance, or [use it for] a co-payment or deductible,” Scott told Reporters on Nov. 10.

Consumers could use the funds to buy any plan authorized by their state’s insurance commission, he added.

Republicans generally have been reluctant to extend the enhanced subsidies without also addressing abuse of the Obamacare system, which they say rose dramatically after those subsidies were introduced.

The expiration date indicates that the subsidies were not considered a long-term solution, Dr. Mehmet Oz, administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, said in a Fox News interview on Nov. 16.

“It creates incentives for fraud,” he said.

“Instead of paying insurance companies to manage our money, let’s trust Americans to manage their own care — with a pre-funded Federal Flexible Spending Account,” he said.

A Flexible Spending Account is similar to a Health Savings Account but is not owned by the individual and does not roll over from year to year.

Commercial health insurance premiums have risen every year since 2008, according to Health System Tracker, a data collection site run by the nonprofits The Peterson Center on Healthcare and KFF.

 >>/72471/
> no proof

OK, here you go:
https://fortune.com/2021/11/10/health-insurance-premiums-2021/
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/11/11/premiums-for-employer-health-insurance-have-jumped-47percent-in-10-years.html
https://www.advisory.com/daily-briefing/2025/03/17/healthcare-costs
https://insuranceinformant.com/how-health-insurance-premiums-have-increased-over.html
https://www.investopedia.com/health-care-premiums-jump-in-2023-after-modest-rise-last-year-8363873
https://www.ama-assn.org/health-care-advocacy/advocating-public-health/more-insured-patients-drive-higher-health-spending
https://www.usnews.com/news/health-news/articles/2023-10-18/health-insurance-premiums-rise-7-in-u-s-survey-shows
https://www.newsweek.com/healthcare-premiums-will-go-2025-experts-say-2023401
https://www.pgpf.org/article/why-are-americans-paying-more-for-healthcare/
https://www.gao.gov/blog/health-insurance-costs-are-increasing-markets-become-more-concentrated-fewer-insurance-companies-interactive-map
https://www.newsweek.com/health-insurance-premiums-rising-80-percent-2026-2132062
https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/gallup-poll-record-number-adults-anxious-health-costs-2026-rcna244358




thumbnail of furby.png
thumbnail of furby.png
furby png
(2.69 MB, 1600x1200)







thumbnail of WhatsApp Image 2025-11-13 at 4.36.28 PM.jpeg
thumbnail of WhatsApp Image 2025-11-13 at 4.36.28 PM.jpeg
WhatsApp Image... jpeg
(37.09 KB, 1600x827)
thumbnail of WhatsApp Image 2025-11-13 at 4.36.29 PM (1).jpeg
thumbnail of WhatsApp Image 2025-11-13 at 4.36.29 PM (1).jpeg
WhatsApp Image... jpeg
(138.86 KB, 1600x828)
thumbnail of WhatsApp Image 2025-11-13 at 4.36.29 PM (2).jpeg
thumbnail of WhatsApp Image 2025-11-13 at 4.36.29 PM (2).jpeg
WhatsApp Image... jpeg
(139.17 KB, 1600x827)
thumbnail of WhatsApp Image 2025-11-13 at 4.36.29 PM.jpeg
thumbnail of WhatsApp Image 2025-11-13 at 4.36.29 PM.jpeg
WhatsApp Image... jpeg
(260.37 KB, 1600x827)
Not sure where else to post this, but I found something odd while browsing an old onion link 
hhtps://kcmykvkkt3umiyx4xouu3sjo6odz3rolqphy2i2bbdan33g3zrjfjgqd.onion/  it used to load a minimal page with the name CypherWrks but now it’s completely dead.
I tried digging around on DuckDuckGo, both in the clearnet and through Tor, but got basically nothing. Then I started testing domains cypherwrks.com, .io, .net, .ia, .moe all dead or parked. The only one that actually loads is cypherwrks.org.
There’s a folder named Proteus with a few text files dated October 2025, talking about something called “filtrations” and a “Genesis X ledger event.” Weirdly, in the current clearnet version that line about Genesis X is gone, like it was edited out or replaced.
No explanation, no ads, no tokens, just static pages. Google shows almost zero results. The phrasing sounds AI-generated but also too coherent to be random. Maybe a hoax, maybe some old underground testnet?
Posting here in case someone knows the story behind it or remembers it from older chans (I’ve dug at 4chan archive without luck).
17 replies omitted. Click to expand viewer



>  Anon says "liberal arts bullshit"
>  > Automatically reveals his some frustrated fuck fag engineer
>  >> Anyone with real science knowledge appreciate speculation just for the fun of it. Maybe it's not super accurate but at least say something to probe them wrong




thumbnail of Hazel yahira castro la que amo.jpeg
thumbnail of Hazel yahira castro la que amo.jpeg
Hazel yahira castro... jpeg
(85.78 KB, 1024x1024)







thumbnail of 1763059057056864.jpg
thumbnail of 1763059057056864.jpg
1763059057056864 jpg
(138.33 KB, 1290x1226)


thumbnail of James_Madison_by_Gilbert_Stuart.jpg
thumbnail of James_Madison_by_Gilbert_Stuart.jpg
James_Madison_b... jpg
(300.28 KB, 1280x1575)


thumbnail of 1763716464274572.jpg
thumbnail of 1763716464274572.jpg
1763716464274572 jpg
(452.39 KB, 1200x900)
STACEY PLASKETT IS A DELEGATE FROM THE U.S VIRGIN ISLANDS WHERE EPSTEIN'S ISLAND IS LOCATED (LITTLE ST. JAMES ISLAND) AND IT HAS NOW BEEN PROVEN WITHOUT A DOUBT THAT SHE WAS RECEIVING LIVE COACHING THROUGH TEXT MESSAGES FROM JEFFREY EPSTEIN WHILE SHE WAS CARRYING OUT HER DUTIES AS AN ELECTED MEMBER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES!!!

> BUT WAIT THERE IS MORE!!!!
STACEY PLASKETT WAS ALSO APPOINTED BY JOE BIDEN IN 2021 TO BE THE HEAD OF THE "WEAPONIZATION OF GOVERNMENT SUBCOMMITTEE" WHICH STATED PURPOSE IS

> The purpose of the House Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government is to investigate alleged abuses of power by executive branch agencies, including the FBI, Department of Justice, and others, and to examine how they collect information on U.S. citizens

https://archive.is/IuPmD

> BUT WAIT THERE IS MORE!!!!!
IN 2016 ONE OF PLASKETT'S COMPUTERS WAS "COMPROMISED" AND PHOTOS AND VIDEOS OF HER HUSBAND WERE RELEASED TO THE PUBLIC SHOWED HER HUSBAND NAKED, HERSELF NAKED, HER HUSBAND IN DRAG WITH YOUNG CHILDREN AS YOUNG AS 5 YEARS OLD.

> But the video that Ms. Plaskett described as playful, includes what appears to be a rather disturbing twist. The congresswoman can be heard talking while recording her husband with a cellphone. He appears to be fully naked, and is wearing lipstick and eye shadow. Then, he says something to one of their children — appearing to be between 5-7 years old — who then appears behind her seemingly naked father.

https://archive.is/ZrhiU
https://archive.is/PmKbb

SO A PEDOPHILE WHO IS ALREADY ON VIDEO SINCE 2016 BEING A PEDO WAS THE HEAD OF THE COMMITTEE IN CHARGE OF UPROOTING "CORRUPTION" IN THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND WAS ALSO RECEIVING LIVE COACHING VIA TEXT MESSAGES FROM EPSTEIN HIMSELF MONTHS BEFORE HE WOULD BE ARRESTED IN 2019!!!!
10 replies omitted. Click to expand viewer
USVI Delegate Stacey Plaskett (D) has deep ties to Jeffrey Epstein, exposed in Lee Fang's June 2023 article & court docs from USVI vs. JPMorgan lawsuit.

Key Ties:

Worked 2013-2014 at Kellerhals Ferguson Kroblin PLLC, Epstein's tax/lobby firm that secured him $300M+ in improper tax breaks via VI Economic Development Authority (Plaskett previously counsel there; claims "don't recall" working for Epstein entities). Gap on her LinkedIn.
Epstein network funded her 2014 upset congressional win (aides like Cecil de Jongh, Darren Indyke, Lesley Groff donated; Epstein maxed out in 2016/2018).
Personally solicited Epstein: Met him in St. Thomas office & NYC mansion (2018, via Groff - accused recruiter); emailed for fundraiser invites w/ Bloomberg; sought $30K for DCCC (rejected due to his crimes).
2019: Texted Epstein during Cohen hearing (video evidence).
Kellerhals (her ex-boss/intro to Epstein) handled Epstein's wills, island buys, charities, & estate post-death.

Other Context:

2016: Plaskett's nude video leak w/ husband in makeup & child visible; blamed enemies.
2022-23: USVI AG Denise George sues JPMorgan for enabling Epstein (Dec 27); Biden visits USVI (Dec 28); George fired days later (Jan 3).

Plaskett downplays as "unaware" of donations & claims she alone returned funds - contradicted by records (kept >$30K from associates; others also returned money).

Full Lee Fang: https://www.leefang.com/p/house-democrat-worked-for-epsteins

What checks out as documented/factual:

Plaskett worked 2013–2014 at a small St. Thomas law firm (Kellerhals Ferguson Kroblin) whose main client was Epstein; the firm handled his massive tax breaks, island purchases, charities, wills, etc. She has a mysterious 2-year gap on LinkedIn and said “I don’t recall” when deposed about working on Epstein matters.
Epstein’s inner circle (Cecil de Jongh, Darren Indyke, Lesley Groff, Erika Kellerhals) heavily backed her 2014 upset congressional win; Epstein himself max-donated in 2016 & 2018.
She personally solicited him: emails show her inviting him to fundraisers (including one with Bloomberg), meeting him in his NYC mansion in 2018, and trying to get $30k for the DCCC (rejected because he was already a convicted sex offender).
Newly unsealed Epstein estate files (released ~Nov 2025) confirm she was texting him in real time during the Feb 2019 Michael Cohen hearing — he fed her lines about Trump Org “henchmen,” praised her questioning, etc. This part is now undisputed.

Plaskett’s defense (consistent since 2019):

Epstein was a wealthy constituent in her district (Little St. James was in USVI).
She claims she welcomed “information from anyone” as a former prosecutor, wasn’t coordinating, and eventually donated the direct Epstein contributions (~$8k) to anti-trafficking charities after his arrest/death.
She insists she was unaware of the depth of his crimes when soliciting and kept most money from his aides (total >$30k).

What’s optically terrible but not proven criminal:

Actively courting a known 2008 convicted sex offender (post-Florida plea deal) for years, meeting at his mansion, texting him for dirt on political opponents during a hearing.
The “I don’t recall” about firm work and claims she only found out about donations from the media look shaky next to the emails/deposition.

Recent political fallout (Nov 2025):
House Republicans tried to censure her and boot her from the Intelligence Committee over the 2019 texts. It failed narrowly (209–214), almost entirely along party lines (a few GOP votes/presents sank it). Democrats closed ranks; Jamie Raskin called it “just a constituent call.” It became a partisan football rather than a serious ethics reckoning.

Bottom line: The connections are deeper and more deliberate than your average “he was a donor” politician story — she sought him out repeatedly, even after his 2008 conviction. Nothing proves she knew about or participated in the trafficking itself, but the judgment looks awful in hindsight, and the new texts make her “unaware constituent outreach” explanation harder to swallow. It’s the kind of thing that fuels endless conspiracy threads, but the paper trail is real and embarrassing rather than clearly criminal.





thumbnail of 20241212_222933.jpg
thumbnail of 20241212_222933.jpg
20241212_222933 jpg
(1.93 MB, 2944x2208)
i desperately want to be degraded. i wasn't sure where to put this because i'm new to the site. came here just to make this post.

i'm a 26 year old tranny faggot. i'm severely mentally ill and a massive whore. ive cheated on my partner of 6 years dozens of times and i would do it again just for attention & to feel some lovely shame. i hate myself. i get off on hating myself though. i frequently get myself into avoidable situations where i get raped. i want to be brutalized. fucked and insulted and discarded.

please insult me in detail. please indulge in my depravity. tell me how you'd rape me, tell me everything. i'd do anything for you.

i originally posted this in the comments of a different post because i'm also a retard
20 replies omitted. Click to expand viewer
Man to cunt or cunt to man? You sound like a lying piece of shit. Why would anyone but a degenerate crackhead fuck some worthless tranny like you. One might say you should stick a fucking shotgun in your mouth and leave the world off a better place. Cut you dick and and get ass fucked by a zebra you kike son of a bitch. I hope you get raped by a pack of gorillas that escaped from the zoo. kys faggot




If you love freedom, you might wonder if you should spend your life savings to fight for freedom.

You might wonder if your effort would do any good.

You might ask yourself if Americans deserve to be saved.

You might wonder if surrender is the only answer to tyranny.

https://crystal.cafe/b/



thumbnail of Screenshot_20251117_171905_Ecosia.jpg
thumbnail of Screenshot_20251117_171905_Ecosia.jpg
Screenshot_20251117_1... jpg
(264.31 KB, 1079x847)
thumbnail of Screenshot_20251115_004244_Ecosia.jpg
thumbnail of Screenshot_20251115_004244_Ecosia.jpg
Screenshot_20251115_0... jpg
(110.12 KB, 924x254)
thumbnail of Screenshot_20251114_215543_Ecosia.jpg
thumbnail of Screenshot_20251114_215543_Ecosia.jpg
Screenshot_20... jpg
(324.09 KB, 1080x1452)
thumbnail of Screenshot_20251022_230130_Ecosia.jpg
thumbnail of Screenshot_20251022_230130_Ecosia.jpg
Screenshot_20251022_2... jpg
(99.73 KB, 1080x396)
thumbnail of Screenshot_20251022_125005_Ecosia.jpg
thumbnail of Screenshot_20251022_125005_Ecosia.jpg
Screenshot_20251022... jpg
(284.26 KB, 1080x1151)
> Moids tell women to choose better

> Moids and moid apologists tell women to stay virgin

> Moids admit that all of them just want to make people suffer

> I stay virgin

> Moids and moid apologists are still triggered

> Moids complain about their horniness epidemic

> Moids admit they all lie for sex

> Moids want me to feel bad about other women lying

> Moids admit that they never turn down sex

> Moids want me to feel bad that other women have too much sex



fourth screenshot is about what women want during sex btw.

> Moids tell women to communicate clearly

> Women communicate clearly

> Moids accuse women of lying (thus not communicating clearly) because the fact that not all women are masochists is too inconvenient for mindless monsters

> Moids accusse women of shooting above their league

> Bald moids want to fuck young women

> Moids whine about cheating and double standards

> All moids cheat if they can
6 replies omitted. Click to expand viewer
Americans used to think hippies were lazy fruits for dropping out during the Vietnam War, but maybe the hippies had the right idea after all.

If you can't change a corrupt system, why be a part of it?


The globalists are happy when Americans beg for government bans and government mandates because more government control means that the elites will be able to send Americans to the concentration camps and ovens faster.

 >>/72687/

Males are inferior and should be treated accordingly.

> Moids having sex, including cheating, at every opportunity:
> Also moids accusing virgin women of being cheating whores:

Male moment...

> WAHMAN SAY THAT RAPE IS BAD!!11!
> Why do women hate me??? :(

I don't buy sex books? I'm also not a sex tourist, sex tourism is a moid behavior, and it also has nothing to do with rape...

Most women aren't feminists, you fucking retard. I used to be a feminist, but then I started listening to moids, and now I realize that moids are inferior :)

There is no such thing as a feminist moid. Feminists are too apologetic of moids, but moids are obviously worse.

> I get loads of pussy, but also, women are evil because no one will have sex wkth me

Kill all males. Babies and baldies. Male existence is cannot be justified. 

> "Why don't women have sex with me for my personality?"
> Look inside
> He just wants to torture women and girls, just like every other moid

 >>/72692/
> Constantly whine about not getting laid
> Whine about nail polish
> Call women whiny for not being complicit in demonic jeet moid behavior

Wow.

Americans scream that you cannot possibly have a society without high taxes, but why could the USA have a civilization and low taxes in 1920?

Americans say that you cannot have morals without tyranny, but why could the US have morality and freedom in 1950?




Post(s) action:


Moderation Help
Scope:
Duration: Days

Ban Type:


0 replies | 0 file
Refresh
New Thread
Max 20 files0 B total