a random b banner

/b/ - Random

Anything posted here are autistic works of fiction, only a fool would take them seriously.


New Thread
X
Max 20 files0 B total
[New Thread]

Page: Prev [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] Next | View | Catalog | Banners | Logs


thumbnail of nordic.png
thumbnail of nordic.png
nordic png
(10.74 KB, 471x90)






thumbnail of OIP (38).jpeg
thumbnail of OIP (38).jpeg
OIP (38) jpeg
(20.18 KB, 474x366)







thumbnail of 1756502503005452.webm
thumbnail of 1756502503005452.webm
1756502503005452 webm
(5.9 MB, 640x360 vp9)


thumbnail of 6a00d8345223b869e201b7c8108f2f970b-600wi.jpg
thumbnail of 6a00d8345223b869e201b7c8108f2f970b-600wi.jpg
6a00d8345223b869e201b... jpg
(107.79 KB, 600x452)
Big search engines like Google track your activity and sell your data for ads — which is why a lot of us don’t search freely anymore. I’ll share a few alternatives I’ve found, and would love to hear what others are using too!

DuckDuckGo: Best for untracked searching
Startpage: Best for unprofiled browsing
MyAllSearch: Clean interface and an emphasis on user privacy.
Qwant: GDPR-protected searching
Startpage: Combines the top results of multiple engines, primarily Gigablast and Yandex.
28 replies omitted. Click to expand viewer







thumbnail of 459b0b98b84e44afac446e94a55e49eada9d8ab265b3ffb8bf2c3e5a8c98f2c8.png
thumbnail of 459b0b98b84e44afac446e94a55e49eada9d8ab265b3ffb8bf2c3e5a8c98f2c8.png
459b0b98b84e44afac446... png
(433.54 KB, 692x691)
who else wishes we could just go back to a time where things made sense, where we didn't have to worry about being broken into by some lowlife nigger scum trash crackhead trying to steal your Hi-fi System to buy his next fix or having to be made to put up with Tranny degeneracy and being tried to be shamed because you don't want a grown ass fucking man in a dress trying to use the girl's bathroom or get into women's spaces and sports.

don't you just wish we could go back to a time where everyone knew their place and didn't step out of their line.
7 replies omitted. Click to expand viewer







thumbnail of 2005.jpg
thumbnail of 2005.jpg
2005 jpg
(138.58 KB, 1780x1320)
If you want to see what your company is monitoring on your work laptop, search your user folder (C:\Users\yourusernamehere\) for PolicyNudgeClassification. 

You will find an .xml file call PolicyNudgeClassificationDefinitions_randomcharshere.XML. 

In this file you can see what data your company is monitoring and/or blocking. 

And you can use this to bypass those policies by removing or changing those keywords they are looking for. 

Spread the word!

Not at all surprised anymore. The whole economy is a joke now. No more consumer choice. No more free market. No more fair competition. Everything is monopolized by private equity, hedge funds owned by central bank stockholders. Privacy is lost. Innovation is destroyed. Endless debt props up the fake and gay illusion of an economy. Fiat currency losing purchasing power every year. Statistics are fraudulent lies. Nothing is real. Media lies. Institutions corrupt. Governments collude with systemic corruption.

BRICS+ will be the future, count on it.




thumbnail of OIP-836145950.jpg
thumbnail of OIP-836145950.jpg
OIP-836145950 jpg
(7.39 KB, 200x255)
thumbnail of OIP-3060756456.jpg
thumbnail of OIP-3060756456.jpg
OIP-3060756... jpg
(28.02 KB, 474x711)
thumbnail of OIP-3506511954.jpg
thumbnail of OIP-3506511954.jpg
OIP-3506511954 jpg
(30.13 KB, 474x639)
thumbnail of OIP-2968804968.jpg
thumbnail of OIP-2968804968.jpg
OIP-2968804968 jpg
(24.3 KB, 474x451)







thumbnail of yipper.png
thumbnail of yipper.png
yipper png
(280.73 KB, 598x530)
Just over 15 years ago, when the Democrat-controlled House and the Democrat-controlled Senate were debating the healthcare proposals offered by the Democrat president, nearly everyone on the political right was unified in opposition. It may well have been the last time the right was united on anything, but it was indeed unified and resolute.

Congresswoman Michelle Bachmann (MN) warned that “This monstrosity of a bill will not only destroy the private healthcare market, it will lead to massive increases in premiums and rationed care.” Congressman (and eventual vice-presidential nominee and Speaker of the House) Paul Ryan (WI) complained that “This bill is a fiscal Frankenstein. It’s a government takeover that will explode costs and kill jobs.” Senator (and Republican Leader) Mitch McConnell (KY) insisted that Americans “want reforms that lower costs, not a trillion-dollar government experiment.”

Even the Heritage Foundation — in the news lately for purportedly exacerbating rifts in the conservative coalition — likewise agreed with everyone in the movement, insisting that Obamacare was a disaster waiting to happen and would keep none of the promises that it made, all while destroying what was good and valuable in the private insurance market.

More than a decade later, when it was clear that the system was in trouble and that only greater government intervention and spending could save it, the Heritage Foundation took something of a victory lap, detailing Obamacare’s manifest failures and arguing that it was long past time to scrap the whole experiment.

The ACA dramatically increased health insurance premiums and cost-sharing in the individual market…
The ACA collapsed insurer competition in the nation’s individual markets…
The ACA failed to meet official enrollment targets in the individual markets…
The ACA is pricing middle-class Americans out of individual market coverage…
The ACA expanded government coverage while wrecking the private individual health insurance market…
The ACA compromised access to care for persons — including those with pre-existing medical conditions — enrolled in the nation’s individual markets…
The ACA failed—and failed miserably to attract young people into the exchange insurance pools…
The ACA’s vaunted delivery reforms did not yield the anticipated savings.

Everything Republicans warned would happen did happen. And the Democrats’ response was to offer a massive “temporary” increase in subsidies to help paper over the failures. Again, every sentient person in the country insisted that doing so would be a disaster, that the subsidies would only increase costs, and that they would not be temporary.

Worse still, in addition to sticking their fingers in their ears and ignoring the experiences of the last decade and a half, the Democrats are actually blaming the Republicans for all of the healthcare system’s problems, insisting that the GOP is somehow responsible for their delusions.

Normal people, of course, think that the institutions created by Obamacare are destructive, costly, and ultimately ineffective. And we know they believe this because so many of them said so before the system was ever put in place. The Democrats disagree, and they will not be dissuaded from their course by any appeals to theory or experience. They want to keep the institutions and keep reforming them until they inevitably find the right formula.
2 replies omitted. Click to expand viewer

Trump floated the idea of giving low- and middle-income Americans a direct payment of $2,000 rather than providing a subsidy that is paid to insurance companies.

That would allow people to purchase their own insurance, Trump said in a Nov. 8 social media post. The president added that this would avoid putting more money into a health coverage system that, he said, provided inferior health coverage.

The White House is in discussion with lawmakers about the idea, Trump told reporters on Nov. 14.

“I’ve had personal talks with some Democrats,” he said, adding that the plan would allow consumers to negotiate their own price with an insurer.

Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) is drafting legislation for a similar plan now. His plan would send money directly to individual Health Savings Accounts, much like Trump suggested.

“They can use it to spend on healthcare, so they can buy direct health care, or they can buy insurance, or [use it for] a co-payment or deductible,” Scott told Reporters on Nov. 10.

Consumers could use the funds to buy any plan authorized by their state’s insurance commission, he added.

Republicans generally have been reluctant to extend the enhanced subsidies without also addressing abuse of the Obamacare system, which they say rose dramatically after those subsidies were introduced.

The expiration date indicates that the subsidies were not considered a long-term solution, Dr. Mehmet Oz, administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, said in a Fox News interview on Nov. 16.

“It creates incentives for fraud,” he said.

“Instead of paying insurance companies to manage our money, let’s trust Americans to manage their own care — with a pre-funded Federal Flexible Spending Account,” he said.

A Flexible Spending Account is similar to a Health Savings Account but is not owned by the individual and does not roll over from year to year.

Commercial health insurance premiums have risen every year since 2008, according to Health System Tracker, a data collection site run by the nonprofits The Peterson Center on Healthcare and KFF.

 >>/72471/
> no proof

OK, here you go:
https://fortune.com/2021/11/10/health-insurance-premiums-2021/
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/11/11/premiums-for-employer-health-insurance-have-jumped-47percent-in-10-years.html
https://www.advisory.com/daily-briefing/2025/03/17/healthcare-costs
https://insuranceinformant.com/how-health-insurance-premiums-have-increased-over.html
https://www.investopedia.com/health-care-premiums-jump-in-2023-after-modest-rise-last-year-8363873
https://www.ama-assn.org/health-care-advocacy/advocating-public-health/more-insured-patients-drive-higher-health-spending
https://www.usnews.com/news/health-news/articles/2023-10-18/health-insurance-premiums-rise-7-in-u-s-survey-shows
https://www.newsweek.com/healthcare-premiums-will-go-2025-experts-say-2023401
https://www.pgpf.org/article/why-are-americans-paying-more-for-healthcare/
https://www.gao.gov/blog/health-insurance-costs-are-increasing-markets-become-more-concentrated-fewer-insurance-companies-interactive-map
https://www.newsweek.com/health-insurance-premiums-rising-80-percent-2026-2132062
https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/gallup-poll-record-number-adults-anxious-health-costs-2026-rcna244358




thumbnail of furby.png
thumbnail of furby.png
furby png
(2.69 MB, 1600x1200)







thumbnail of WhatsApp Image 2025-11-13 at 4.36.28 PM.jpeg
thumbnail of WhatsApp Image 2025-11-13 at 4.36.28 PM.jpeg
WhatsApp Image... jpeg
(37.09 KB, 1600x827)
thumbnail of WhatsApp Image 2025-11-13 at 4.36.29 PM (1).jpeg
thumbnail of WhatsApp Image 2025-11-13 at 4.36.29 PM (1).jpeg
WhatsApp Image... jpeg
(138.86 KB, 1600x828)
thumbnail of WhatsApp Image 2025-11-13 at 4.36.29 PM (2).jpeg
thumbnail of WhatsApp Image 2025-11-13 at 4.36.29 PM (2).jpeg
WhatsApp Image... jpeg
(139.17 KB, 1600x827)
thumbnail of WhatsApp Image 2025-11-13 at 4.36.29 PM.jpeg
thumbnail of WhatsApp Image 2025-11-13 at 4.36.29 PM.jpeg
WhatsApp Image... jpeg
(260.37 KB, 1600x827)
Not sure where else to post this, but I found something odd while browsing an old onion link 
hhtps://kcmykvkkt3umiyx4xouu3sjo6odz3rolqphy2i2bbdan33g3zrjfjgqd.onion/  it used to load a minimal page with the name CypherWrks but now it’s completely dead.
I tried digging around on DuckDuckGo, both in the clearnet and through Tor, but got basically nothing. Then I started testing domains cypherwrks.com, .io, .net, .ia, .moe all dead or parked. The only one that actually loads is cypherwrks.org.
There’s a folder named Proteus with a few text files dated October 2025, talking about something called “filtrations” and a “Genesis X ledger event.” Weirdly, in the current clearnet version that line about Genesis X is gone, like it was edited out or replaced.
No explanation, no ads, no tokens, just static pages. Google shows almost zero results. The phrasing sounds AI-generated but also too coherent to be random. Maybe a hoax, maybe some old underground testnet?
Posting here in case someone knows the story behind it or remembers it from older chans (I’ve dug at 4chan archive without luck).
17 replies omitted. Click to expand viewer



>  Anon says "liberal arts bullshit"
>  > Automatically reveals his some frustrated fuck fag engineer
>  >> Anyone with real science knowledge appreciate speculation just for the fun of it. Maybe it's not super accurate but at least say something to probe them wrong





Post(s) action:


Moderation Help
Scope:
Duration: Days

Ban Type:


0 replies | 0 file
Refresh
New Thread
Max 20 files0 B total